31 C.F.R. § 10.7 limits on unenrolled preparers upheld

Practical and Practice issues for Professionals who practice in the area of taxation. Moral, social and economic issues relating to taxes, including international issues, the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, state tax issues, etc. Not for "tax protestor" issues, which should be posted in the "tax protestor" forum above. The advice or opinion given herein should not be relied on for any purpose whatsoever. Also examines cookie-cutter deals that have no economic substance but exist only to generate losses, as marketed by everybody from solo practitioner tax lawyers to the major accounting firms.
jg
Fed Chairman of the Quatloosian Reserve
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 2:25 am

31 C.F.R. § 10.7 limits on unenrolled preparers upheld

Postby jg » Sat Sep 13, 2008 2:45 am

From the NAEA Alert:
The US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld on appeal a decision of the Middle District of Florida in Patrick H. Wright v. Mark W. Everson. The plaintiff challenged the validity of 31 CFR § 10.7(c)(1)(viii), by claiming that the Circular 230 section unlawfully and arbitrarily limits his right to represent taxpayers before IRS.

For the case, See http://www.mmsend2.com/ls.cfm?r=1644632 ... 713167.pdf
“Where there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income.” — Plato

Return to “Tax Practice & Policy and Tax Shelters”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest