More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Post by **Judge Roy Bean** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:58 pm

Interesting. I didn't know Napolitano was KGB.

And it looks like people are still buying into Elvick's bond gibberish.

Dezcad · Post by **Dezcad** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:02 pm

That ridiculous reasoning would explain why they recently sent this letter to the Clerk.

U .S. DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NH

James Starr

Clerk of Court

U.S . District Court
55 Pleasant St.

ConcordN.H. [03301]
April 26, 2009

Dear Mr. Starr:

Would you kindly send us a complete accounting of cases :

06-CR-00071-01/02-SM
09-CR-00030-01 /02-CZ S

What would be the final pay-off amount for these cases ?
Thank you.

Edward-Lewis:Brown©, Creditor Elaine-Alice:Brown©, Creditor
Holder-in-due-Course with Holder-in-due-Course with
unlimited commercial liability unlimited commercial liability

Thule · Post by **Thule** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:22 pm

By the way, I happen to have the bonds of Ed & Elaine right here. Been meaning to rid my self of them, troublesome account to be honest. 25 Q a piece.

Doktor Avalanche · Post by **Doktor Avalanche** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:45 pm

unlimited commercial liability unlimited commercial liability

Why not just proclaim yourselves Emperor and Emperess of the Universe while you're at it.

Post by **wserra** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:52 pm

Doktor Avalanche wrote:Why not just proclaim yourselves Emperor and Emperess of the Universe while you're at it.

Ahh, they'd never do that.

After all, "Emperor" and "Empress" are titles of nobility. They're the Sovereign and Sovereigness of the Universe.

Post by **Demosthenes** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:53 pm

wserra wrote:
Doktor Avalanche wrote:Why not just proclaim yourselves Emperor and Emperess of the Universe while you're at it.
Ahh, they'd never do that.

After all, "Emperor" and "Empress" are titles of nobility. They're the Sovereign and Sovereigness of the Universe.

Tsk tsk. Ed is the Sovereign, and Elaine is nothing more than a sub-part of Ed.

fortinbras · Post by **fortinbras** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:48 pm

Where was that letter to the editor published or posted??

Post by **Demosthenes** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:12 pm

http://freereno.wetpaint.com/page/Letters?t=anon

Post by **wserra** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:13 pm

And don't forget this piece of epic, filed Tuesday. The indictment must be dismissed, you see, because it doesn't name "Edward-Lewis;Brown© and Elaine-Alice:Brown©" as "Creditors", so it's obviously defective - although the Browns apparently got their colons mixed up.

Doesn't that make them incontipent?

Post by **Famspear** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:16 pm

......the Browns apparently got their colons mixed up.

I hate it when that happens.......

Post by **jkeeb** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:13 pm

Does that happen because of visitations:conjugal?

Post by **Judge Roy Bean** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:42 pm

wserra wrote:And don't forget this piece of epic, filed Tuesday. The indictment must be dismissed, you see, because it doesn't name "Edward-Lewis;Brown© and Elaine-Alice:Brown©" as "Creditors", so it's obviously defective - although the Browns apparently got their colons mixed up.

Doesn't that make them incontipent?

Dang. I'm glad I'm using someone else's keyboard.

VanMeters Revenge · Post by **VanMeters Revenge** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:45 pm

Demosthenes wrote:http://freereno.wetpaint.com/page/Letters?t=anon

I've noticed you did not post the bottom half of the letter.

Post by **Demosthenes** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:43 pm

VanMeters Revenge wrote:
Demosthenes wrote:http://freereno.wetpaint.com/page/Letters?t=anon
I've noticed you did not post the bottom half of the letter.

The bulletin board software apparently truncates photos that exceed a certain page size. The full size photo is available on the link I posted later.

Is there something special in the bottom portion that isn't lunatic fringe crap?

Post by **Judge Roy Bean** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:44 pm

And is there anything on that snippet that has any more significance to reality than the first page?

Let me answer that for you - no.

Doktor Avalanche · Post by **Doktor Avalanche** » Fri May 01, 2009 1:15 am

Damn, Donna, that was weak - even for you.

VanMeters Revenge · Post by **VanMeters Revenge** » Fri May 01, 2009 2:26 am

Doktor Avalanche wrote:

Damn, Donna, that was weak - even for you.

LOL what the heck did I do now, man I was just pointing out the fact the whole thing isn't there, since someone took their time to post it and all.

VanMeters Revenge · Post by **VanMeters Revenge** » Fri May 01, 2009 2:32 am

Here's the rest btw

Doktor Avalanche · Post by **Doktor Avalanche** » Fri May 01, 2009 3:03 am

VanMeters Revenge wrote:Here's the rest btw

Yup...more meaningless sovrun drivel.

How's that working out for them?

Quatloos!

More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns

Re: More lunatic fringe ravings from the Browns