Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

A collection of old posts from all forums. No new threads or new posts in old threads allowed. For archive use only.
.
Pirate Purveyor of the Last Word
Posts: 1698
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 2:06 am

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by . »

That's a serious case of narcissism piled on top of serious delusions. Makes Ed: family incarcerated look like a piker, not an easy thing to do.
All the States incorporated daughter corporations for transaction of business in the 1960s or so. - Some voice in Van Pelt's head, circa 2006.
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by notorial dissent »

Demosthenes wrote:
Gregg wrote:Second, if Elaine is really brainwashed, maybe it'll be good for her, which no matter how mean I am, would also be good. Without Ed she becomes just another Daffy Dentist.
I was thinking about this in my bubble bath last night. The judge has good reason to question that Elaine in unduly controlled by Ed.

After Ed and Elaine were arrested in October 2007, all contact between them was cut off by the BOP after an attempted conference call set up by the idiot brigade of supporters. Ed went quiet and stewed for months, but Elaine filed dozens of UCC-type crap filings. It wasn't Ed who prepared and sent in the 1099-OID stuff, it was Elaine, without Ed telling her what to do.

As for the "Elaine is out of question with reality", she's simply parroting the same absurb legal theories that Dogwalker was relying on and the BOP shrink said that such a lack of originality indicated that he isn't delusional.
Demo, while I feel no sympathy towards either of the parties here, it does come to mind after looking over events of the last year you are quite right in your thoughts here.

I personally think Ed family:really stupid is certifiably bat shit, but not legally incompetent as far as the law is concerned. He is just a really nasty, mean spirited, violent waste of protoplasm who deserves whatever happens to him.

Elaine on the other hand is something of a contradiction. She obviously was smart enough and good enough to get through dental school, develop a practice, and stay at it for a good number of years, enough so that she racked up a considerable tax debt in the process. On the other hand, I do not see her as being particularly smart in any other fashion, and probably has few outside interests other than her practice and family, which is why I do not believe the TD gibberish she has been regurgitating is anything other than a parroting of Ed family:really stupid.

She quite frankly has the wrong personality and mind set for this particular type of nonsense, but she does want/need approval and constant support to such an extent and on such a basic level that she will do anything to get it. On the surface, she seems to be a quite affable friendly likeable grandmotherly sort of person, who must have inspired confidence and loyalty in her patients or they wouldn’t have kept coming back. I have not, however, seen any indication of any independence of person or spirit, and from what I have heard lately, she seems to require some kind of constant presence to keep her going.

I haven’t heard anything about her previous husband, although if the children are any indication he was no prize either, and I would suspect that he too was fairly dominating, and that she followed whatever path he chose, just as she has blindly followed Ed family:really stupid.

I have yet to see any indication of any personal independence, and in fact what I do see is that all her actions are reflections of Ed. I think Elaine is a very needy and insecure person who has to have constant reassurance and outside support, and that to get it she would probably do almost anything.

I do not think she is capable of critical thought at this point, nor has she been for quite some time, and has in fact been so brain washed and controlled, that the actions she now finds herself in jail for are really not her own. I am quite convinced that if she is examined by a competent practitioner that the finding will be; that she is not capable of putting on her own defense as long as Ed is allowed to over shadow her, and that if she is separated from him both physically and emotionally that there will be a marked change in her personality.

I do think that if Elaine is to have a ghost of a chance of actually defending herself in this or any other matters, that she needs to be immediately separated from Ed and from his trial and any and all contact with him until this matter is resolved, otherwise she will continue to parrot his nonsense and go down the same shute to oblivion he has already chosen for himself.

I guess since he didn’t get to sacrifice her bloodily to his cause/ego, he’d just do it in pieces by taking her down with him.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1229
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Number Six »

According to the Wikipedia article on the Browns, Elaine is at the prison complex in Fort Worth, Texas, I had thought she was in Danbury.

As for the Brown's "guru", there should be some legal basis to get his purulent mass out of circulation, and out of threat and provocation of other such fragile situations.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Demosthenes »

Number Six wrote:According to the Wikipedia article on the Browns, Elaine is at the prison complex in Fort Worth, Texas, I had thought she was in Danbury.

As for the Brown's "guru", there should be some legal basis to get his purulent mass out of circulation, and out of threat and provocation of other such fragile situations.
Elaine was transferred from her relatively cushy prison in Danbury to a medium security admin prison in Texas as a result of her filing those phony 1099s against the judge. You know, the ones she filed without Ed telling her what to do...

After she was indicted, however, she and Ed were both moved to a county prison in the New Hampshire area pending trial.

Who is the guru?
Demo.
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Famspear »

Demosthenes wrote:
Number Six wrote:According to the Wikipedia article on the Browns, Elaine is at the prison complex in Fort Worth, Texas, I had thought she was in Danbury.

As for the Brown's "guru", there should be some legal basis to get his purulent mass out of circulation, and out of threat and provocation of other such fragile situations.
Elaine was transferred from her relatively cushy prison in Danbury to a medium security admin prison in Texas as a result of her filing those phony 1099s against the judge. You know, the ones she filed without Ed telling her what to do...

After she was indicted, however, she and Ed were both moved to a county prison in the New Hampshire area pending trial.

Who is the guru?
In the Wikipedia article, I have now deleted the references to the prior prisons residences of family Brown....
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
Number Six
Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
Posts: 1229
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Number Six »

Who is the guru?
Famspear wrote:Who is the guru?
[/quote]

In the Wikipedia article, I have now deleted the references to the prior prisons residences of family Brown....[/quote]

"Guru" was the wrong word. I was thinking about Ray Karczewski.
Last edited by Number Six on Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)

'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by notorial dissent »

I thought that little pimple, Joe Haas, was their “legal council”.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

RaymondKarczewski wrote:Demand the Court Follow their Own Law and PROVE JURISDICTION over Ed and Elaine Brown Before making a further Mockery of Justice in America.


By Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

So how much did I rack up, Ray-Ray?

Image
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros
Thule
Tragedian of Sovereign Mythology
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:57 am
Location: 71 degrees north

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Thule »

And the ever-coherent Joe Haas chimes in with his opinion, using his brilliant understanding of language to prove that "to prompt" means "without having a little drink after dinner". Or something:
Haas wrote:prompt = without delay
delay - = postpone
post = after
pone = meal
Survivor of the Dark Agenda Whistleblower Award, August 2012.
Thule
Tragedian of Sovereign Mythology
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:57 am
Location: 71 degrees north

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Thule »

Actually, Haas reminds me of the chief character in the play "Erasmus Montanus", by Holberg.

Erasmus returns home after several years at the Copenhagen university, eager to impress his family and friends with his newfound knowledge and impressive use of logic. He then proceeds to prove that his mother is a stone ("A stone can't fly, Mother can't fly, ergo Mother is a stone"). General upheaval and weeping, until Erasmus sets things straight ("A stone can't talk, Mother can talk, ergo Mother is not a stone").

Erasmus then proceeds to make a fool of himself in all kinds of situations, and merriment occurs.
Survivor of the Dark Agenda Whistleblower Award, August 2012.
User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3994
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by webhick »

Looks like the Monitor has turned off commenting on the article. Maybe Joe will freak out in a 42 page letter to the editor.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

Yeah I noticed that, too.

It's dissapointing, really - I had my heart set on reading some authentic frontier gibberish today.
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros
ErsatzAnatchist

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by ErsatzAnatchist »

Try the Monitor again. Joe ass has posted his Gibberish.
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Demosthenes »

Browns Say They Want To Represent Themselves
Couple Facing Weapons Charges Say They Don't Believe In System
POSTED: 11:12 am EDT June 1, 2009

CONCORD, N.H. -- A couple convicted of tax evasion preparing to stand trial on conspiracy and weapons charges said Monday they want to represent themselves, even though they don't believe in the legal system.

Ed and Elaine Brown are preparing to stand trial on conspiracy and weapons charges. At a pretrial hearing Monday, the two said they want to represent themselves, but they may not participate much in the trial.

Elaine Brown told a federal judge that the she won't take part in the trial, saying, "If the prosecutor wants to steal my life, he does it without me."

Ed Brown also told the judge that he doesn't believe in the system. He said that he views defense attorneys as a legal affectation and part of the legal conspiracy.

The Browns were convicted in 2007 for failure to pay income taxes. Prior to their arrest and conviction, the Browns kept federal officers at bay from their Plainfield, N.H. home for nearly a year.

The conspiracy and weapons charges are in connection with that standoff.

The judge told the Browns that they would have to be in the courtroom for at least part of the jury selection and the trial. He also warned them that he believes they are hurting their chances if they persist in their decision to represent themselves.

The defense has also asked the judge to rule on the competency of Elaine Brown to stand trial. The judge said he would issue a ruling on that later.

The trial is scheduled to get under way on June 30 and is expected to last about 10 days.
Demo.
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Famspear »

From the article:
.....the Browns kept federal officers at bay from their Plainfield, N.H. home for nearly a year.
I would count from roughly January 18 (the date of the guilty verdict for Ed) to October 4, 2007. Eight and a half months, approximately. Or maybe the time should start before that - during the trial whenever Ed stopped attending (not sure of the date). A long time, granted. I am splitting hairs, but in my opinion "nearly a year" might be a bit of a stretch.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Demosthenes »

Famspear wrote:From the article:
.....the Browns kept federal officers at bay from their Plainfield, N.H. home for nearly a year.
I would count from roughly January 18 (the date of the guilty verdict for Ed) to October 4, 2007. Eight and a half months, approximately. Or maybe the time should start before that - during the trial whenever Ed stopped attending (not sure of the date). A long time, granted. I am splitting hairs, but in my opinion "nearly a year" might be a bit of a stretch.
Ed's arrest warrant was dated the day he didn't show up at trial. 9 months would be far more accurate than 1 year.
Demo.
Scoop

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Scoop »

Demosthenes wrote:
Famspear wrote:From the article:
.....the Browns kept federal officers at bay from their Plainfield, N.H. home for nearly a year.
I would count from roughly January 18 (the date of the guilty verdict for Ed) to October 4, 2007. Eight and a half months, approximately. Or maybe the time should start before that - during the trial whenever Ed stopped attending (not sure of the date). A long time, granted. I am splitting hairs, but in my opinion "nearly a year" might be a bit of a stretch.
Ed's arrest warrant was dated the day he didn't show up at trial. 9 months would be far more accurate than 1 year.
It's actually even trickier than that, since Elaine didn't join Ed for several weeks. I stick to "nearly nine months," even though the tenure of both Browns was closer to eight.
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Demosthenes »

Yesterday's hearing sounds like a doozie.

From Scoop's new article:
In a conversation with Elaine Brown, Judge George Singal described the couple's legal strategy as "almost a suicide pact" and said the couple had little chance of avoiding guilty verdicts without changing course.

"I am concerned at this point in your life, you're heading towards the edge of a cliff without a second thought," Singal said.
The entire article is here:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs ... /906020324
Demo.
Dezcad
Khedive Ismail Quatoosia
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:19 pm

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by Dezcad »

Demosthenes wrote:Yesterday's hearing sounds like a doozie.

From Scoop's new article:
In a conversation with Elaine Brown, Judge George Singal described the couple's legal strategy as "almost a suicide pact" and said the couple had little chance of avoiding guilty verdicts without changing course.

"I am concerned at this point in your life, you're heading towards the edge of a cliff without a second thought," Singal said.
The entire article is here:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs ... /906020324
If Elaine believes this:
"I cannot consent to re-enter your court and play by your rules," she said. "I am prepared for the consequences because there is a greater justice."
then nothing that the judge or her stand-by counsel will say to her will change her mind. After all, in Elaine's brainwashed mind, everyone involved (judge, prosecutor and stand by counsel) are all trying to "trick" her into consenting to the jurisdiction of the court. She, and Ed, feel that they are too "smart" to fall for that.
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: Elaine Brown's competence and Ed's control of her

Post by LPC »

In a conversation with Elaine Brown, Judge George Singal described the couple's legal strategy as "almost a suicide pact"
A classic folie a deux.
"I don't live in this legal fiction world," Ed Brown said.
Does he think that the prison he lives in is also a legal fiction?
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.