E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

A collection of old posts from all forums. No new threads or new posts in old threads allowed. For archive use only.
Noah
Exalted Parter of the Great Sea of Insanity
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Noah » Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:33 pm

Arthur Rubin wrote:
Thule wrote:
Famspear wrote:It's "Pollock," not "Pollack."


I'm prette sure he was referring to Academy Award winning director Sydney Pollack...
Quite possibly. It's hard to keep these people straight, as I don't have them in my macro list.


I was referring to Pollock. I stand corrected :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1457
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Brea, CA

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Arthur Rubin » Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:42 pm

CaptainKickback wrote:I also recall activists using the courts to get the US Navy (part of the federal government/USA) to have its subs stop using active sonar, as it was possibly upsetting the whales. I think that was a temporary injunction - I could be wrong.
It was recently overturned by the US Supreme Court, whether it was temporary or permanent.
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95

User avatar
Quixote
Quatloosian Master of Deception
Posts: 1539
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Sanhoudalistan

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Quixote » Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:29 am

I may be confused but how many injunctions have you, or anyone you know, obtained against the United States of America ?


That gets my vote for non sequitur of the week.

In my opinion there is a major difference that is decisive in each case.


Which you could have made explicit, but did not. One can't help speculating on the reason for that curious omission on your part.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat

Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7196
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Famspear » Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:08 am

Noah wrote:The "differences" are very important. A opinion that the differences are not important reminds me of the statement "...they are exactly the same but only different....."

In my opinion there is a major difference that is decisive in each case.

I may be confused but how many injunctions have you, or anyone you know, obtained against the United States of America ?


Injunctions? Yes, you are confused.

No, the "differences" are not important.
...why is anyone in this [losthorizons] community paying the least attention to...'Larry Williams' [Famspear], or other purveyors of disinformation from...quatloos? – Pete Hendrickson, former inmate 15406-039, Fed’l Bureau of Prisons

User avatar
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5231
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 4:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby LPC » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:48 am

Noah wrote:As I see it the 16th does not overide [sic] Pollack [sic].

The Supreme Court saw it differently:
“[T]there is no escape from the conclusion that the [16th] Amendment was drawn for the purpose of doing away for the future with the principle upon which the Pollock [sic] Case was decided....”

Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916).

Oh, and you're a g-damn narcissistic illiterate ignorant moron, in case you didn't know already.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

Noah
Exalted Parter of the Great Sea of Insanity
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Noah » Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:58 am

Famspear wrote:
Noah wrote:The "differences" are very important. A opinion that the differences are not important reminds me of the statement "...they are exactly the same but only different....."

In my opinion there is a major difference that is decisive in each case.

I may be confused but how many injunctions have you, or anyone you know, obtained against the United States of America ?


Injunctions? Yes, you are confused.

No, the "differences" are not important.


ok

Noah
Exalted Parter of the Great Sea of Insanity
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Noah » Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:59 am

LPC wrote:
Noah wrote:As I see it the 16th does not overide [sic] Pollack [sic].

The Supreme Court saw it differently:
“[T]there is no escape from the conclusion that the [16th] Amendment was drawn for the purpose of doing away for the future with the principle upon which the Pollock [sic] Case was decided....”

Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916).

Oh, and you're a g-damn narcissistic illiterate ignorant moron, in case you didn't know already.


ok

Noah
Exalted Parter of the Great Sea of Insanity
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Noah » Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:11 am

CaptainKickback wrote:You asked the wrong question to the wrong bunch of people Sunny Jim.



You got that right Captain :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 6355
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 7:39 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby wserra » Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:49 pm

Noah wrote:
LPC wrote:Oh, and you're a g-damn narcissistic illiterate ignorant moron, in case you didn't know already.


ok


Acceptance is the first step to enlightenment.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume

Noah
Exalted Parter of the Great Sea of Insanity
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Noah » Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:12 pm

wserra wrote:
Noah wrote:
LPC wrote:Oh, and you're a g-damn narcissistic illiterate ignorant moron, in case you didn't know already.


ok


Acceptance is the first step to enlightenment.



It is impossible to get light from a black hole

User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 4954
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Pottapaug1938 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:50 pm

Noah wrote:
It is impossible to get light from a black hole


Thanks to you, we already know that.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools

Noah
Exalted Parter of the Great Sea of Insanity
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Noah » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:52 pm

Pottapaug1938 wrote:
Noah wrote:
It is impossible to get light from a black hole


Thanks to you, we already know that.


ok

User avatar
Quixote
Quatloosian Master of Deception
Posts: 1539
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 3:00 am
Location: Sanhoudalistan

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Quixote » Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:33 pm

Aww, now we'll never know about those key differences between the 1894 and 1913 tax acts. My money was on semicolon placement.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat

Noah
Exalted Parter of the Great Sea of Insanity
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby Noah » Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:59 pm

Quixote..
You would lose your money on the semi-colon.. :wink: I do agree with your nomination concerning my comment about Injunctions. I also agree with the Court decisions in the Bill Benson cases. My agreement must be based on confusion, right ?

darling
First Mate
First Mate
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: E-Mail from a Bill Benson Fan

Postby darling » Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:01 pm

Noah wrote:Quixote..
You would lose your money on the semi-colon.. :wink: I do agree with your nomination concerning my comment about Injunctions. I also agree with the Court decisions in the Bill Benson cases. My agreement must be based on confusion, right ?


ok


Return to “Public Archives -- Read Only”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest