I must whole-heartedly agree that how "compensation for services" does not, in fact, cover salaries and wages of the private non-privileged worker does require "citation rather than declaration".buddy wrote:Thanks JJB for you expanded and edited version of Tax History.I think this part of the puzzle - and a key one at that - requires more citation rather than declaration to be fully convincing.......buddy wrote:How has the original Sec 86 salary duty morphed into "compensation for services"? And how is it that "compensation for services" does not, in fact, cover salaries and wages of the private non-privileged worker?
For many it is not a puzzle; but for all it is a key part of seeing through the CtC nonsense.