Winston Shrout wrote:
In case you haven’t seen the ‘news’, the USA vs. WINSTON SHROUT ended in a guilty on all charges verdict. In this case there were ‘charges’ made by US Attorney against the entity known as WINSTON SHROUT and then the job of the attorney was to somehow make a connection of WINSTON SHROUT and Winston Shrout.
Boy, I can imagine how difficult it must have been for the prosecution to “somehow make a connection” between “WINSTON SHROUT” and “Winston Shrout.”
It was standard procedure that when Winston made any motion it was routinely dismissed.
That’s what happens when you make frivolous arguments.
Of course, I filed all of my assignment of reversionary interest and authentication paperwork into the case, but to no effect as there was an agenda here.
Yeah. The agenda was to conduct the trial in a sane and orderly manner, according to the rules of law. Frivolous arguments in court are not worthy of serious consideration.
Every battle field commander knows that to win or lose one battle does not win or lose a war. I am fully confident that the ‘big’ war has already been decided, but yet like the Japanese soldier who was found decades after the end of WWII on some remote island in the Pacific who still thought the war was waging, we have some who think they can still win the war by picking off this or that soldier. It won’t work.
Every battle field commander knows that to win, you have to bring real weapons and real ammunition to the battle field, Winston. You are not a battle field commander, and you have no clue about the law.
Most people are not high enough in the ‘chain of command’ to experience what I have had to deal with.
Most people are not high up enough in the chain of crooks, you mean, to have to experience what you have had to deal with. How fortunate for them!
Again, when I get pulled over in a low-level traffic situation and after running my STRAW MAN on NCIC, the officer just sends me on my way, that is on the day to day stuff most of us deal with.....
Yeah, right.
But since I operate at some of the higher levels, and much of it on the international level, I run into things that 99% of people don’t experience....
Yeah. Right. Winston, you have never operated at a higher level, international or otherwise. And the only higher level you are going to be seeing in the future might be a top bunk -- in your prison cell.
In some respects, the ‘Guilty’ verdict actually helped me...
Yeah. Free room and board for Winston Shrout, care of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. I bet you just can’t wait, eh Winston?
So, what now? Was it a total loss?
Is that a trick question?
But let me cue one important thing I was able to accomplish. The Office of International Treasury Control has been in existence since 1995. I have exposed this in several of the public arenas where I have spoken as I have shown my official association with that. For instance, when I received an official appointment into the OITC in 2010, Dr. Ray C. Dam as sole arbiter ‘noticed’ the appropriate officers in the US Government and the United Nations. Look at the word ‘noticed’. For those who are a bit educated in some of this, you would be aware that a ‘notice’ has little weight … ‘I got noticed, so what?’.
Yeah.
So what?
But when I was able to take the stand and give evidence in my own defense, with the help of some ‘angel’, I was able to put my appointment and accompanying Apostille into ‘evidence’ meaning now that OITC has moved beyond ‘notice’ as I was able to make the ‘record’. Oops. Now can the US say … ‘so what?’, or is there now a responsibility/liability? That was one small ‘victory’, but obviously it did not win the battle.
Eeewwwwwww! Be still, my heart!
The U.S. can indeed say “so what”. And the U.S. prosecutor won the battle. The “Office of International Treasury Control” is about as real as the millions of women who find me to be irresistible.
Winston, if you end up with a cell mate, I’m going to feel sorry for him. Unless it’s someone who refuses to listen to your blather, in which case I hope you will learn to keep your mouth shut.
Will I solve this problem in the US court system? Maybe, but there appears to be little remedy there. I will take this up at the international level. I suspect that I will shortly have this resolved.
Eeewwwwwww! You got everyone where you want ‘em, eh Winston?