Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Moderators: Judge Roy Bean, Prof

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby David Merrill » Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:09 pm

You are welcome! Maybe you didn't catch the P.S.


Pursuant to the jury verdict returned Friday, November 20, 2009, which acquitted the Defendants identified herein of all charges, the offenses alleged within the Bill of Indictment with reference to Defendants KATHY RAY WAHLER, EDWARD WILLIAM WAHLER, and LEWIS VINCENT HUGHES, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.



It is fun teaching people who they are.
David Merrill
 

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby David Merrill » Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:30 pm

People who know who they are:

Image


P.S. I think maybe Wesley has been less than honest with us - c'mon SERRA, let's have it.

NOTICE RE: REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have 5 business days to file a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction and 21 calendar days to file a Redaction Request. If no notice is filed, this transcript will be made electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter before the 90 day deadline. After that date it may be
obtained through PACER. Policy at http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov
David Merrill
 

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby David Merrill » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:17 am

You don't suppose there might actually be Direct Treasury Accounts available?


Discharge Student Loan
David Merrill
 

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby Pottapaug1938 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:04 am

David Merrill wrote:You are welcome! Maybe you didn't catch the P.S.


Pursuant to the jury verdict returned Friday, November 20, 2009, which acquitted the Defendants identified herein of all charges, the offenses alleged within the Bill of Indictment with reference to Defendants KATHY RAY WAHLER, EDWARD WILLIAM WAHLER, and LEWIS VINCENT HUGHES, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.


No, I caught it all right. I just was laughing at the idiocy of people who twist themselves into pretzels trying to "prove" that they are John Jacob Jingleheimer, of the family Schmidt, instead of John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: West of Provincetown, but east of North Adams. South of Salisbury, but north of Aquinnah.

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby David Merrill » Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:30 am

Pottapaug1938 wrote:
David Merrill wrote:You are welcome! Maybe you didn't catch the P.S.


Pursuant to the jury verdict returned Friday, November 20, 2009, which acquitted the Defendants identified herein of all charges, the offenses alleged within the Bill of Indictment with reference to Defendants KATHY RAY WAHLER, EDWARD WILLIAM WAHLER, and LEWIS VINCENT HUGHES, are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.


No, I caught it all right. I just was laughing at the idiocy of people who twist themselves into pretzels trying to "prove" that they are John Jacob Jingleheimer, of the family Schmidt, instead of John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt.



By appearing the man, Lewis Vincent he never became trustee for the LEWIS VINCENT HUGHES.

The result was acquittal. Let Wesley dig up that transcript for us? It shows what I mean.
David Merrill
 

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby Thule » Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:53 am

David Merrill wrote:The result was acquittal. Let Wesley dig up that transcript for us? It shows what I mean.


Why should he? It's your claim that your random words actually works, prove it yourself.
Survivor of the Dark Agenda Whistleblower Award, August 2012.
User avatar
Thule
Tragedian of Sovereign Mythology
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:57 am
Location: 71 degrees north

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby David Merrill » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:45 pm

Thule wrote:
David Merrill wrote:The result was acquittal. Let Wesley dig up that transcript for us? It shows what I mean.


Why should he? It's your claim that your random words actually works, prove it yourself.




Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....



People who love the truth love that kind of language.

You should just admit that you know in your heart that Lewis Vincent is the name Mr. and Mrs. Hughes gave thier little baby.

Both Wesley and Dezcad have PACER at hand and can easily bring up documentation from the docket. But they will not? Anyway, it is Wesley who brought this thread about in the first place. He should explain why all he did was announce the acquittal - on 32 counts by the way.

It makes it look like all Quatlosers are sadistic cyber-sociopaths who only enjoy when people get clobbered and imprisoned.


Regards,

David Merrill.
David Merrill
 

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby Pottapaug1938 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:16 pm

Looking at the top, it looks as if this is a case of jury nullification, rather than of the wahlers' claims withstanding legal challenges.

I will respect the principles claimed by the Wahlers once they have withstood appellate review.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: West of Provincetown, but east of North Adams. South of Salisbury, but north of Aquinnah.

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby Judge Roy Bean » Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:42 pm

Pottapaug1938 wrote:Looking at the top, it looks as if this is a case of jury nullification, rather than of the wahlers' claims withstanding legal challenges.

I will respect the principles claimed by the Wahlers once they have withstood appellate review.


There is no appeal on an acquittal; the jury found the Wahlers not guilty and from what we gather here, the prosecution apparently failed to convince them. But the Wahlers will probably not change their ways and will wind up with another indictment for other acts.

But we see again the twisted mental logic Van Pelt uses to equate his gibberish with a simple event. There is no relationship between the two, but Van Pelt gets all excited about his hit counters and is compelled to re-re-re-re-re-re-regurgitate.
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat
Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
 
Posts: 2985
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby David Merrill » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:23 pm

Judge Roy Bean wrote:
Pottapaug1938 wrote:Looking at the top, it looks as if this is a case of jury nullification, rather than of the wahlers' claims withstanding legal challenges.

I will respect the principles claimed by the Wahlers once they have withstood appellate review.


There is no appeal on an acquittal; the jury found the Wahlers not guilty and from what we gather here, the prosecution apparently failed to convince them. But the Wahlers will probably not change their ways and will wind up with another indictment for other acts.

But we see again the twisted mental logic Van Pelt uses to equate his gibberish with a simple event. There is no relationship between the two, but Van Pelt gets all excited about his hit counters and is compelled to re-re-re-re-re-re-regurgitate.



I thinks you mean David Merrill; not Van Pelt.

And we see that Judge Roy Bean has not gotten his PACER subscription as the point is for Wserra or Dezcad to simply link the transcript I described off the docket above. Why don't you just show us the transcript judge? Then we can decide for ourselves about identity - Lewis Vincent or Lewis HUGHES?


Regards,

David Merrill.
David Merrill
 

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby David Merrill » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:46 pm

You really gotta get a kick outa this Quatloser slur:

Minute Entry: JURY TRIAL as to Kathy Ray Wahler, Edward William Wahler, Lewis Vincent Hughes held before District Judge Richard Voorhees. Jury deliberation continues. Jury returns verdict. Government attorney: Jill Rose &Mark Odulio. Standby Counsel: Angela Parrott, Fredilyn Sison, William Terpening &David Burgess. Defendants are Pro Se. Court Reporter Cheryl Nuccio. (cbb) (Entered: 11/23/2009)



Count them! Six government attorners!
David Merrill
 

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby Pottapaug1938 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:08 pm

Judge Roy Bean wrote:
Pottapaug1938 wrote:Looking at the top, it looks as if this is a case of jury nullification, rather than of the wahlers' claims withstanding legal challenges.

I will respect the principles claimed by the Wahlers once they have withstood appellate review.


There is no appeal on an acquittal.....


I know that; I was thinking more of similar cases which say the same things that the Wahlers foisted upon the rubes on the jury in their case.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: West of Provincetown, but east of North Adams. South of Salisbury, but north of Aquinnah.

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby Pottapaug1938 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:10 pm

David Merrill wrote:You really gotta get a kick outa this Quatloser slur:

Minute Entry: JURY TRIAL as to Kathy Ray Wahler, Edward William Wahler, Lewis Vincent Hughes held before District Judge Richard Voorhees. Jury deliberation continues. Jury returns verdict. Government attorney: Jill Rose &Mark Odulio. Standby Counsel: Angela Parrott, Fredilyn Sison, William Terpening &David Burgess. Defendants are Pro Se. Court Reporter Cheryl Nuccio. (cbb) (Entered: 11/23/2009)



Count them! Six government attorners!


Hey, if the jury is willing to go off the rails, it doesn't matter how sound a case you present in court.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: West of Provincetown, but east of North Adams. South of Salisbury, but north of Aquinnah.

Re: Ed & Kathy Wahler found not guilty ....

Postby Pottapaug1938 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:12 pm

[quote="David Merrill"]


I thinks you mean David Merrill; not Van Pelt.

:lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P :lol: :P
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
Location: West of Provincetown, but east of North Adams. South of Salisbury, but north of Aquinnah.

Previous

Return to US

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest