Here's the Ownmon video that brought the Volks to my attention:
- An important Message to the Lawyers of Lawsen & Lundell LLP for HSBC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpaldYwdenM
Hurrah, it's "minister" "paraclete" Belanger warning the law firm of Lawsen & Lundell and its evil lawyers, Bryan Gibbons and Kimberly Robertson, against foreclosing on the Volks’ residence. It’s the usual CERI ‘write government officials and miracle authority away’ strategy (viewtopic.php?f=48&t=9261), mind you with a stern warning – the Volks are apparently now “ministers” of CERI. Question not their instant and newfound faith, heathens! The King James Bible Smiteth!
That said, it's Belanger's usual patter. Dare not foreclose on them (2:00)! You can’t intimidate a “minister” of the CERI faith (2:30) – the Criminal Code says so. And it doesn’t matter if they just signed up. The Inns of the Court are bound by the King James Bible (3:30)!
And Belanger claims (4:00) that the Supreme Court of Canada, “Your Commercial God!”, in an unnamed 2004 judgment said that a contract is void if it runs contrary to religious belief. That would be this judgment, I’d think:
- Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 SCC 47,  2 SCR 551: http://canlii.ca/t/1hddh
Sadly, the “minister” “paraclete” Belanger didn’t read the judgment very closely, I guess. It’s about whether Jews had a religious right to set up a ceremonial “succah” hut in a luxury condo building balcony – because that right to religious freedom was protected by …
Drum roll please …
- The Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, R.S.Q., c. C-12.
Oops. So it’s not so viable outside of Quebec, like in B.C. where the Volks dwell. Civil law vs. common law and all that stuff. But it gets funnier. The majority decision says nothing about a general principle that religion overrides contract. In fact, it hardly mentions contracts at all. Not a single Canadian case that I could find indicates Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem provides a general rule that religion overrides contract.
Anyway, Belanger warns the bank that usury is wrong, and that the payments the Volks have made to date are offered to close this matter, rather than be bound to the “Annals of Darkness”. And then, the ominous warning (6:00):
This puts you into a breach of your duty of case, as the directors of your various organizations, and LLPs. That breach represents a tort application against you and is undefeatable in any court that a person takes you to – in your private capacity. Now I’m not mentioning these things as a threat to you. I’m merely bringing these into your awareness as the watchman: Ezekial 33 …
That’s my position here today to you, is to let you know that these men and women are exercising their faith, and they’re sincere, and you do not get to trod on it without opening up yourself to private liability – and your bond is gone.
And of course … you’re intimidating them! Inteeeeeemmmmmeeddating them! Intttttttteeeeeeemmmmeddddatting!
Oh, and no magic hat to be seen.
It didn't take long to find the lawsuit:
- Victoria Law Courts, Docket #133743 - HSBC BANK CANADA v VOLK, Roderick
And here’s the bankster’s claim: http://www.mediafire.com/view/zhz2you7k ... tition.pdf
The Volks are in default of a mortgage signed on March 5, 2007. The bank seeks foreclosure and sale of the property, and solicitor and client costs. Currently the Volks owe about a quarter million.
The response makes interesting but depressing reading (http://www.mediafire.com/view/l6fn7ugws ... tition.pdf). Para. 2 suggests the Volks tried the “five letters/three letters” debt cancellation scheme: they demanded a copy of the signed mortgage agreement, probably with "wet ink". HSBC apparently instead closed all their accounts. If true, that indicates this bank is taking a pretty aggressive approach to OPCA schemes.
What follows is a positive grab-bag of OPCA concepts which I can’t align with any particular guru or belief set. Para. 4 reads:
“I am the living, sovereign Witness to the Evidence of the Name Fraud and I have the Prima Facie evidence in the form of the Birth Certificate (copies are attached in Exhibit AD and AE) for the dead legal fiction which you have pentitioned to appear in your private BAR court room. By these words let the Living Witness be known for and on the record I would be committing fraud by representing the Name on the Birth Certificate which is Crown Copyright Owned and for you to aid and abet me to do so is fraud on your part also. Under oath with full commercial liability and penalty of perjury are you enticing me into Slavery?”
The witness statement above is for both Carol and Rod of the Volk Family Clan.
Ok, that’s pure CERI/Belanger tripe. But the next paragraph is a split/double person scheme that sounds Freemanish:
The appearance of the all caps names on all of the documents for case SCBC Action No. 13 3743, Victoria Registry is the paper it is written on. Court has jurisdiction over paper – Period – it is for corporations, not natural persons.
We do not accept any liability for a NAME that is copyright owned by the crown.
Then in para. 6 the Volks demand the lawyers’ oaths – but don't get them. Next at para. 7, it’s our ol’ friend Pope Francis’s Apostolic Letter!
The Apostolic Letter removed your immunity rendering ALL courts COMMON LAW.
There is a copy of this letter included in Exhibit AD and AE.
So the Volks have, at a minimum, been exposed to the Gold Shield Alliance annotated Apostolic Letter.
What’s next in this grab-bag? Menard’s “the only law is do no harm” motif (para. 8):
In summary we feel that there has been so much information submitted to the banks and the lawyers involved that someone needs to take everything we have submitted seriously. The oldest law is DO NO HARM. All we have been trying to do is show the TRUTH however, no one seems to want to look at it. I hope the judge reading this does take a really good look.
Ok – so we have CERI, Freemanish concepts, GSA – what else? The next paragraph (para. 10) (its actually several paragraphs but hey I didn’t number this) is pure Sovereign Citizen:
There are two very active JURISDICTIONS going on here and the “system” defaults to ADMIRALTY, LEX MERCHANTORIUM, COMMERCE, and PHOENICIAN FRAUD where they are also in COMMON LAW jurisdiction but you all avoid it because it removes ALL ability of the “judge” to command the CORPORATE ship and, in turn, your SHIP/NAME as a secondary ship of the line.
A jury has power of the judges and lawyers where they are rendered mute in the same way that we cannot be “heard” in their STATURORY COMMERCE COURTS because we are deemed “legally dead by consent” for using the DEAD LEGAL NAME/FICTION.
A living being CANNOT contract with a dead corporation and why the intensity surrounding the demanding that we GIVE/CONSENT to a LEGAL NAME because it enables pirates to board our ships and plunder our wealth because we are assumed as part of their FLEET without knowing.
We stand in COMMON LAW/NATURAL LAW, without assumption/presumption being allowed. As previously stated, the courts operate in both capacities BUT default to “DEAD BY CONSENT/SURETY LEGAL COMMERCE/SALVAGE RIGHTS versus lawful living truth.
Remember, the court’s immunity has been removed via the Apostolic Letter and therefore makes all of you lawfully liable for your actions where your layer of CORPORATE PROTECTION has been fully stripped away; the emperor has no clothes.
Whew! That’s a blast! Now, as a banana freighter, I am deeply concerned by the implications of this analysis on my legal status. I don’t think I can be “a secondary ship of the line”, can I? Heck, I can’t keep up with a predreadnought, let alone a battle cruiser! Salvage rights?! Pirates?! Banana-plundering?!
Anyway, while that … quite bizarre hodgepodge is impressive, it didn’t work. The court on February 12, 2014 ordered the Volks pay up the outstanding amount or the land would be sold (http://www.mediafire.com/view/d9068t3m4 ... 0Order.pdf).
The deadline is August 12, 2014. Just a couple more weeks for the Volks – and I suspect that if they have Invoked the Paraclete that they’re still in the residence. Sad.
So, as usual, I poked around. I found nothing significant on CanLII or other databases. With a bit of exploration I discovered the Volks had two businesses. One was a ‘scrapbooking’ business run by Carol (http://www.scrapbookparade.ca/team.php). It folded recently. The Volks may still operate a lawnmower/small engine repair shop called “Volk’s Enterprises”, though on Goggle maps I couldn't find it:
- http://www.profilecanada.com/companydet ... ictoria_BC
http://www.forlocations.ca/51481/lawnmo ... -orono-ave
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Volks-En ... 9221722858
It’s described this way on the Facebook page:
Volk's Enterprises has been in business since 1993 in the Western Communities. We service all small engines from lawnmowers, weed-eaters, chainsaws, generators and more...
Most repairs are done within 2 - 3 days!
Great Service and Great Prices!
FREE Estimates - Call First!
We also buy small engine products (eg. Lawnmowers)
I think Carol rather than Rod is the driver behind this mess. She also operates under the name “Carol Werner Volk”. Her Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/carol.w.volk/) indicates she's a follower of Michael Tellinger, the South African UBUNTU guru.
She also reviews Volk's Enterprises on Facebook, which is a little tacky.
Using "Carol Werner Volk" we see she's a new-age kook, crystals et al (https://www.facebook.com/TranquilityHea ... 9888805792), "blessing circles" (https://www.facebook.com/onenessvictori ... 0935089400), photos of “chemtrails” (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... 1405871934) (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... 1405871934), and so on.
And here she is enthusiastically endorsing Belanger's methods in the comments (http://ecclesiasticsalvation.wordpress. ... nt-page-1/) in Thomas Peterson's (viewtopic.php?f=48&t=9829) 'miracling away taxes' blog:
Carol Werner Volk
November 21, 2013 at 9:07 pm
The lies, fraud and deals they do should put them all in jail!!!
Another victim of the Belanger-Machine. Hopefully the Volks find a way to get themselves out of this mess. I have a nasty suspicion that both their businesses may have gone under – and if so, it’s a pity to see persons in desperate financial situations being abused by conmen such as Belanger.
Nice going Ed! Time for another toke, I guess.