Quatloos!

noblepa wrote:Better yet, give us the name of the Court where this allegedly happened and the name of your friend, so that those with access can look up the court record and see what REALLY transpired in the court.

That of course would be the best and easiest for all parties. However, the freeman could argue that no record was ever created, thus shifting the onus to the party implying that such a record is always created.

Appro of nothing, I know I should probably not post this and I really don't mean to incite the wrath of the pigman, but i keep reading the name of this thread as Pisspot... Carry on...

pigpot wrote:My friend beat all charges and walked free.

Lots of people beat all charges and walk free. Nothing new there.
What's your point?

rumpelstilzchen wrote:Lots of people beat all charges and walk free. Nothing new there.
What's your point?

Reminds me of this one: http://canlii.ca/t/fwsm0

Despite all efforts to the contrary with freemanism, he was acquitted because there was no case.

And its documented.

It's like Déjà vu all over again. Pigpot makes a single gibberish post and disappears. Standard procedure. This triggers a barrage of responses on Quatloos which, since they are replying to gibberish, are equally devoid of content. Again, standard procedure. Unlike Hope Girl Pigpot has found the way to create a perpetual motion machine.

Freemanism is a dead horse. What else are we going to beat?

LordEd wrote:Freemanism is a dead horse. What else are we going to beat?

To be fair, pigpot did not mention freemanism. All he said was

My friend beat all charges and walked free.

Lots of people end up in court, are found not guilty and walk free. Every day some people are found to be not guilty. Freemanism doesn't come in to it.

pigpot wrote:My friend

I currently have a 102 fever so pardon my language; but no asshat like pigsnot has any friends. Theres the first lie.

Ninj

Im aboot 99% sure this is what mr pigman is on aboot.

http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8836.html

Peace
Ninj

bmxninja357 wrote:

pigpot wrote:My friend

I currently have a 102 fever so pardon my language; but no asshat like pigsnot has any friends. Theres the first lie.

Ninj

If you are 102 (actually 38.889 in Canada) you should be in bed with a hot spiced rum instead of posting on Quatloos.

bmxninja357 wrote:Im aboot 99% sure this is what mr pigman is on aboot.

http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8836.html

Peace
Ninj

I hope not. pigpot tried the same type of nonsense here:
viewtopic.php?f=51&t=11284

rumpelstilzchen wrote:

bmxninja357 wrote:Im aboot 99% sure this is what mr pigman is on aboot.

http://marcstevens.net/board/thread-8836.html

Peace
Ninj

I hope not. pigpot tried the same type of nonsense here:
viewtopic.php?f=51&t=11284

No I'm not just on about that one in particular but all of them and that one did control the damage and it shows that you guys are monitoring the successes that we have. Damage control is damage control right?

In a post that will not see the light of day, piggy claimed to identify the real name of another poster. This, of course, is something he lacks the balls to do for himself.

If he finds himself unable to log in, he will thus know why.

pigpot wrote: No I'm not just on about that one in particular but all of them and that one did control the damage and it shows that you guys are monitoring the successes that we have. Damage control is damage control right?

liar liar pants on fire. Clearly you said one friend, one case. Now run away with the goal posts. And if we monitored the success you have it would make for an awful short read. Much like a psychic your wins are no greater than chance. Literally if the folks morons like crackpot steered wrong offered no defence at all they would have a higher freedom count. Then the courts would generally realize you could not defend yourself and do it for you.

Dumber be the day with these unconscionable nincompoops.

Ninj

pigpot wrote:
No I'm not just on about that one in particular but all of them and that one did control the damage and it shows that you guys are monitoring the successes that we have. Damage control is damage control right?

WHAT "successes"? You have yet to show us one.

Not damage control, fact check.

Guy dismissed his own case ignores the case resuming later and summary judgement.

Menard beaking to a dead cell phone and arrested soon after.

Crawford claiming success and losing his house.

pigpot wrote: and it shows that you guys are monitoring the successes that we have.

"We"? "We"? It is "we" all of a sudden is it? You are now including yourself in this list of people who you claim are having successes. Well, well, well.....if you are ever allowed to log on again maybe you will give us the details of your own successes. Court location, date of hearing etc etc....you know the drill.....

He's gone.

His only reason for posting here was to be disruptive. What should we say: "Now, piggy, don't be an asshole and out folks who want to remain anonymous"? No point, right?

While we don't like to ban people, he won't be missed.