Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Moderator: Burnaby49

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 2117
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby arayder » Sun Apr 30, 2017 1:02 pm

Here's an interesting YouTube of a conversation between the well know debunker Doazic and Ben Lowery.

Lowery and Doazic review the status of many well know freeman gurus and Lowery talks about how he went from being someone interested in freeman theory to a critic of the movement.

The two also talk about the harmed caused those who have followed the teachings of the several gurus.

In the comments section you can see Karl Lentz chiming in with some choice comments.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUYFDiw1cWg

User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 6355
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 7:39 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby wserra » Sun Apr 30, 2017 3:31 pm

It was worth a link to the Lentz thread here.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 2117
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby arayder » Sun Apr 30, 2017 5:41 pm

wserra wrote:It was worth a link to the Lentz thread here.


Here ya' go. . .viewtopic.php?f=30&t=10467&hilit=Lentz

I didn't realize how busy Karl has been messing up other people's lives.

At one point in the comments to the above YouTube Karl insists that Doazic tell him who has ever been convicted after using the Lentz method. After Doazic gives him a list of seven people Karl goes all haughty and demands an explanation of the straightforward answer.

Karl Lentz: tell me one person who went to jail doing my STUFF, you can't name one case, give one Case #

Doazic: Paul Gratton, Jason Youngstrand, Richard Rodriguez, John Fall, Vanesa Gonzalez, Elias Trevino, Shariati Mahbobeh, etc.

Karl Lentz: Doazic , please explain

littleFred
Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby littleFred » Tue May 02, 2017 12:24 am

Good discussion, and good comments with Karl Lentz.

On the video, Ben and Doazic discussed the possibility, raised on Quatloos, of Tom Crawford and his wife Sue losing the house that Sue inherited from her mother.

This appears to have been invented by UK Quatloos participants, with no evidence that anyone inherited anything.

User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 6355
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 7:39 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby wserra » Fri May 12, 2017 8:50 pm

arayder wrote:In the comments section you can see Karl Lentz chiming in with some choice comments.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUYFDiw1cWg


Things getting interesting over there.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby notorial dissent » Fri May 12, 2017 11:17 pm

It's really hard to spin being convicted on ALL counts even for an inveterate liar. Particularly when he doesn't control the forum.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 2117
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby arayder » Sat May 13, 2017 1:11 am

wserra wrote:
arayder wrote:In the comments section you can see Karl Lentz chiming in with some choice comments.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUYFDiw1cWg


Things getting interesting over there.


notorial dissent wrote:It's really hard to spin being convicted on ALL counts even for an inveterate liar. Particularly when he doesn't control the forum.


Lentz appears to have gone off the rails including claiming that he isn't allowed to post here.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby notorial dissent » Sat May 13, 2017 2:37 am

He doesn't like the lack acclimation he gets here, but I don't think he's ever posted more than once or twice at most. No one here is buying what he's selling and he doesn't control the narrative. Otherwise see my comment re: inveterate liar.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 2117
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby arayder » Sun May 14, 2017 11:36 am

notorial dissent wrote:He doesn't like the lack acclimation he gets here, but I don't think he's ever posted more than once or twice at most. No one here is buying what he's selling and he doesn't control the narrative. Otherwise see my comment re: inveterate liar.


Most freemen gurus are pretty bad about giving straight answers and arguing the point at hand. But Karl hits a new low by almost immediately calling names and insulting so as to avoid any discussion of his failures.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby notorial dissent » Sun May 14, 2017 1:18 pm

Lentz doesn't and never did deal in straight answers, just hyperbole, obfuscation and evasion.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 2117
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby arayder » Sun May 14, 2017 5:29 pm

notorial dissent wrote:Lentz doesn't and never did deal in straight answers, just hyperbole, obfuscation and evasion.


Here's a YouTube of Lentz having a conversation with Doazic, at least I think it's Doazic. Lentz launches into insult mode right away and is so verbally abusive that there is really no conversation going on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-GW_vorZr8

Lentz insults, split hairs and then sums up his argument by saying his client/friend is in jail only because the powers that be couldn't afford to have a Lentz style truth sayer out on the streets.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby notorial dissent » Sun May 14, 2017 10:45 pm

I think Lentz has gotten more brittle and desperate as he has gotten older and his mounting history of fail is beginning to catch up with him as his record is now catching up with him. One of the positive things of the innerwebs is that the kind of absolute fail that his method generates gets documented and tossed out in to cyberspace where he can no longer hide from it, and everyone can see it. That and I think the old fool has started believing his own con and it finally caught up with him and will ultimately send him to jail. It must be a bitter thing to know that not only does your fantasy NOT WORK, but that it is sending YOU to jail for not working.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2559
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:16 am

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby Jeffrey » Mon May 15, 2017 1:12 am

arayder wrote:Lentz insults, split hairs and then sums up his argument by saying his client/friend is in jail only because the powers that be couldn't afford to have a Lentz style truth sayer out on the streets.


Actually the Frank in question is his step-father who was sentenced in January (9 months after that audio) for sexually abusing a minor:
http://www.nbc29.com/story/34175435/aug ... ttery-case

Even more interesting, Karls real father was also accused of sexual assault but it's not clear if he was ever charged.

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 2117
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby arayder » Mon May 15, 2017 11:42 am

Jeffrey wrote:
arayder wrote:Lentz insults, split hairs and then sums up his argument by saying his client/friend is in jail only because the powers that be couldn't afford to have a Lentz style truth sayer out on the streets.


Actually the Frank in question is his step-father who was sentenced in January (9 months after that audio) for sexually abusing a minor:
http://www.nbc29.com/story/34175435/aug ... ttery-case

Even more interesting, Karls real father was also accused of sexual assault but it's not clear if he was ever charged.


Wow! It's no wonder Karl's got anger management issues.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby notorial dissent » Mon May 15, 2017 1:31 pm

I think the entire family has some serious issues they are NOT dealing with. Dysfunctional doesn't even begin to describe them.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Permanently)
Banned (Permanently)
Posts: 2117
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Doazic & Lowery talk freeman failure

Postby arayder » Tue May 16, 2017 5:31 am

Freemanary used to be new. Now it's an pair of old, ragged shoes on the feet aging losers and nut cases.

There was a time when the gurus offered a sort of hope to the rank and file freemen. Freemen were told they'd have their own courts, that common law would rule and that their government accounts would pay the bills. Instead they got debt, grinding poverty, heavy fines, jailings and broken families . . .and it's all the fault of guru class. . .the gurus who can't make their theories work in their own lives.

It says a lot that the guru class itself is racked with broken families, criminal convictions, flights from prosecution, failed projects, questionable mental health and bad teeth. Sadly, the prosperity and freedom promised by the guru class has alluded the gurus themselves. After years of failure, deception and fund raising scams the brain trust of freemnary is either discredited, jailed or in hiding.

Freemanary has a pulse the same way your drunk uncle's chest heaves when he passes out on the couch after the thanksgiving meal.


Return to “Canada”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest