Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Moderator: Burnaby49

User avatar
eric
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:44 pm

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby eric » Sun Sep 10, 2017 5:01 pm

Stanley Stump, a singer/entertainer by trade, was one of the early advocates and activists for some form of tribal council for the Tsilhqot’in. Associated with him is Dorothy Boyd and Holland/Bryfogle, the Tsilhqot’in National Congress and the fake court. They claim to be descendants/heirs of the war chiefs from the Chilcotin Wars.

Totally separate from all of this is the recognized by the authorities (since 1989) Tsilhqot’in National Government which represents six reserves, some of which have associated sub reserves, often quite tiny and isolated consisting of a few families - example Alexis Reserve has 22 sub reserves.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10912
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby notorial dissent » Sun Sep 10, 2017 5:34 pm

Not sure on the older details yet, but Parson’s history goes back prior to 2014 when he seems to have managed to collect a felony conviction. I will have to see what I can dig up on that. At any rate his current troubles stem from him being among other things an obnoxious SOB it would seem and having a collection of wolf hybrids that apparently had a propensity for being at large and just generally NOT a good neighbor, and in a rural area that DOES NOT win you friends and influence people positively, particularly NOT TN. There were various incidents that led up to him being confronted by an irate neighbor who took exception to having one of the “dogs” appear to be attaching him, and the dog was shot and Parsons went off the deep end and threatened the neighbor and another individual with bodily harm etc, and he apparently came off of his property literally loaded for bear, and the neighbors took offense and called the authorities who caught up with Parsons and arrested him for among other things being a felon in possession. He went to trial and as you can guess things didn’t go well. At one point he and the Mrs barricaded themselves on their farm claiming that they were immune to arrest there since it was sacred ground fo some Indian tribe or some such, oddly the authorities weren’t impressed and arrested him anyway, which I think is where and how we come down to the current events.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 5836
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby Burnaby49 » Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:09 pm

notorial dissent wrote:A further good question to ruin Burnaby's breakfast/morning/imbibing, just who the heck is Stanley Stump Sr and how does he fit in to this morass, other than a sa a possible sock puppet?


I've absolutely no idea, never heard of him before. I'm too terrified of what I might find to type his name in CanLII to see if he's involved in any jurisprudence.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs

User avatar
eric
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:44 pm

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby eric » Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:27 pm

First of all you have to use the proper style when talking about Stan Stump. It's Grand Chief Stanley Stump Senior, of the Chilcotin National Congress. From what I can find on Canlii the only references to him are side mentions when talking about Bryfogle. There are a few youtube videos of him singing, not much else, except from what I can tell he's a "real" Tsilhqot’in from Alexis Lake. All joking aside I have to accord the man some respect for realizing that the pre - 1989 system of scattered, isolated, economically unviable reserves needed to be fixed. We're talking settlements of in some cases less than twenty individuals, 350 kilometres from the closest city (Prince George) with no road or air access. Similarly, until about the 1980's, the Cariboo-Chilcotin region outside the major population centers was pretty wild and woolly - some reserves, ranchers, and die hard gold panners hoping to strike it rich was about all to speak of.

User avatar
eric
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:44 pm

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby eric » Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:53 pm

notorial dissent wrote: At one point he and the Mrs barricaded themselves on their farm claiming that they were immune to arrest there since it was sacred ground fo some Indian tribe or some such, oddly the authorities weren’t impressed and arrested him anyway, which I think is where and how we come down to the current events.

If you're really interested you can find all about Parsons in his own words here:
http://mikeparsons.org
With respect to Indian heritage:
1. supposedly Cherokee from six generations back!
2. is a member of this tribe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemenhah_ ... ganization
3. When item 2 didn't work out so well (perhaps he stopped paying for his membership) somehow he was "adopted" into the Tsilhqot’in National Congress.

Just another fake Indian.....

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10912
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby notorial dissent » Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:42 pm

Uh no, the Nemenhah are another batch of pretend Indians, we seem to have a lot of them in the south and ones claiming affiliation with the Sioux, when none exists. It's pretty much a US sovcit thing. I'm pretty sure I've run across this bunch before in another context.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 5836
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby Burnaby49 » Mon Sep 11, 2017 12:02 am

I've done a posting on a small portion of Bryfogle's legal career;

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=11538

You can see why I don't want to dig into Suzanne Holland's litigation history. My actuarial lifespan just isn't sufficient for the task.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs

User avatar
eric
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 588
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:44 pm

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby eric » Mon Sep 11, 2017 12:57 am

notorial dissent wrote:Uh no, the Nemenhah are another batch of pretend Indians, we seem to have a lot of them in the south and ones claiming affiliation with the Sioux, when none exists. It's pretty much a US sovcit thing. I'm pretty sure I've run across this bunch before in another context.


I was trying to be polite... The Nemenhah actually have a very interesting business plan. You pay them $250 adoption fee plus another $100 per month and that allows you to market whatever off the wall remedy for what ails you with marketing support from them. Consider it the MLM of fake Indians.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10912
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby notorial dissent » Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:35 am

eric wrote:
notorial dissent wrote:Uh no, the Nemenhah are another batch of pretend Indians, we seem to have a lot of them in the south and ones claiming affiliation with the Sioux, when none exists. It's pretty much a US sovcit thing. I'm pretty sure I've run across this bunch before in another context.


I was trying to be polite... The Nemenhah actually have a very interesting business plan. You pay them $250 adoption fee plus another $100 per month and that allows you to market whatever off the wall remedy for what ails you with marketing support from them. Consider it the MLM of fake Indians.

I wasn't being polite, but you are entirely correct about them. and it does explain a lot.

I don't know what Parson's history, as in I haven't turned up anything yet, was before he was arrested for aggravated assault and became a felon, but I'm equally sure it was colorful and equally unpleasant. He just strikes me as the type, and his mug shot is a real winner too.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 5836
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation

Postby Burnaby49 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:00 am

Welcome to the New World Order Canadian genocide brought to you by Communist Canada! It's all in this 2013 video by Suzanne;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZj97B2k5t0

It's all about judicial corruption in Canada and how judges are above the law and pervert it. Just by chance she had an example to give us. Her own lawsuit! What a surprise! Not the case regarding her brain damaged son but the one where she sued the province of British Columbia for allowing mercury in dental fillings.

She got a little confused in her interpretation of American law. saying that commercial free speech was protected by the fifth amendment.

Then she got to the genocide! Justice Leask, who decided against her in the dental filling case, aided and abetted the murder of millions of Canadians in accordance with the New World Order! How did that slip by us? Since there were only about thirty million Canadians in 2012 you'd have thought we'd have noticed. You Americans can easily execute a few million here or there at your secret FEMA concentration camps without anyone noticing but you have ten times our population. A few million murders in Canada is serious business.

After that shocking announcement she suddenly changed tack and left us hanging about how Justice Leask had accomplished this notable achievement. She started droning on citing sections of Acts she'd brought up at her hearing that Justice Leask obviously found less compelling than she did. This lead to the self-evident conclusion that if he's not removed from the bench for finding against her that's proof that the New World Order has placed judges exactly where they want them to cover up all the genocidal attacks that they are trying to inflict upon Canadians and Americans. It's all because Leask ignored her interpretation of the Business Practices Consumer Protection Act. The key to the genocide is right here, ripped right from the Act itself!

A deceptive act or practice by a supplier may occur before, during, or after the consumer transaction and, without limiting subsection (1) one or more of the following constitutes a deceptive act or practice. A representation by a supplier that goods or services;

(i) have sponsorship, approval, performance characteristics, accessories, ingredients, quantities, components, uses or benefits that they do not have,


But Leask ignored this case-winning citation and also refused to accept the findings of a court decision where she'd sued the American Dental Association. I looked that decision up. She lost the case. Very badly;

[10] As to the doctrine of full faith and credit and comity, the plaintiff appears to be urging the court to accept and apply certain decisions of courts in the United States. There is no basis in the law of this province or this country for accepting these submissions and I respectfully decline to do so.

[11] As to res ipsa loquitur, it is a doctrine sometimes applicable in tort actions for negligence. Any claims the plaintiff may have had in negligence against these defendants were dismissed by Rice, J. whose judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Holland v British Columbia, 2009 BCCA 601 (CanLII). There is no present opportunity for the plaintiff to revive those claims; the attempt to do so would be an abuse of process.

[12] As to the plaintiff’s claims of unclean hands and bad faith, I find myself in respectful agreement with the written submissions of counsel for the British Columbia and American Dental Associations:

102. The doctrine of "unclean hands" is not recognized as an independent cause of action at Canadian law. Rather, the doctrine applies at equity to disentitle relief to those who have engaged in deceit or fraud for personal benefit. Those portions of the second statement of claim which purport to allege "unclean hands" ought to be struck as disclosing no cause of action.
Hong Kong Bank of Canada v. Wheeler Holdings Ltd, 1993 CanLII 148 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 167

103. Similarly, the doctrine of "bad faith" is not recognized as a tort in Canadian law. This issue was addressed in Berscheid v. Ensign, where the court commented as follows:
The plaintiff has also attempted to plead a tort of bad faith. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant Environment's conduct, either alone or vicariously through its servants, constitutes a tort creating liability for damages.
In my view, there is no such tort. While bad faith on behalf of public officers may be evidence of the tort of misfeasance of public office, bad faith alone is insufficient to create Crown liability.

104. In Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency), Mr. Justice Meiklem cited Berscheid v Ensign and struck a statement of claim which alleged bad faith as disclosing no cause of action. This remedy is also appropriate in the case at bar.
Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2009 BCSC 952 (CanLII) at para. 47

[13] The real issue in this application is: does the plaintiff have a potential case under the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act? To start with, her pleadings do not properly identify such a claim. I agree with the written submission of counsel for the B.C. and American Dental Associations:

“ ... the second statement of claim does not allege that the applicants fall within the definition of “suppliers” set out in s. 1 of the BPCPA, does not allege that the applicants entered into a “consumer transaction” with the plaintiff as defined in s.1 of the BPCPA, and does not indicate which provisions of the BPCPA that the applicants allegedly contravened.”

[14] These faults are a sufficient basis for striking the relevant portions of her statement of claim. However, the Court must decide whether appropriate amendments could salvage the plaintiff’s claim. In my view, the plaintiff’s case cannot be saved by amendments to her pleadings. Her claim is bound to fail.

[15] My reasons for coming to this conclusion are based on the facts alleged by the plaintiff in her pleadings and her submissions to the Court. In 1982 a dentist filled seventeen of her teeth with amalgam fillings containing mercury. At that time she did not know what substance was being placed in her teeth. She did not know that it was called amalgam nor that it contained mercury. She had no dealings whatsoever with the present defendants. She had no idea what views the defendants may have had about amalgam. Her dealings with her dentist might well have been a “consumer transaction” but there is no possibility of categorizing the current defendants as “suppliers”. There is no evidence that the American Dental Association had any presence in B.C. in 1982. The British Columbia Dental Association did not come into existence until sometime after 1995. I am also in respectful agreement with Rice, J.’s finding concerning the remoteness of these defendants from any real legally significant connection to the facts of the plaintiff’s case.

[16] In submissions the plaintiff characterizes her situation as a continuing delict which commenced with the installation of her fillings in 1982 and continued until they were removed in 2005. I am completely unpersuaded by her submission. There may be some legal situations that can properly be characterized as continuing delicts. I do not believe that such an analysis has any place in construing the application of the BPCPA to the present defendants in this case.

Conclusion

[17] The applications by the defendants are granted. The statement of claim against them is struck out, the action against them is dismissed, and they are entitled to their costs on Scale B.


Holland v. American Dental Association
2012 BCSC 1975
http://canlii.ca/t/fvfxw

Frankly I can't see that citing your own losing cases is a good legal tactic. But then again I don't have Suzanne's vast litigation experience.

So, because of her various court losses, she's exposed Canada as a New World Order dictatorship. Most Canadian are too concerned about next week's paycheque to worry about what life in Canada will be like in the future or how many people the New World Order is murdering in Canada right now, every day. And she's right, I rarely put my mind to the issue of the New World Order's Canadian genocide and I can't say it's a topic of conversation in my few social groups. Absolute power corrupts absolutely and that's exactly what Canada has become. Corrupt from the inside out. Reminds me of this;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9JihWhN4zk

With Canada represented by the pig-lizard.

Now some details. The NWO is killing us with mercury. I must be immune because, as a child of the 50's I've probably got more mercury amalgam than actual teeth left. And Suzanne seems pretty sprightly in that video. With the NWO ruthless mass murder of all opponents why haven't they got around to the woman who is so courageously exposing them?

Then she expanded her genocidal radius to include you Americans. Millions of you killed so that drug companies can sell drugs to counter the heavy metal poisoning inflicted on you by the NWO.

Next she got into contrails and started breaking down over the tragedy of it all. She doesn't follow the standard contrail text though where the planes are spraying nanobots and instead says they are spraying us with heavy metals.

She said she hopes that we enjoy the thought that the NWO has a casket with our names, and our children's names on it. "It's fun for the whole family!" Then she told us that, whatever we do, ignore the Georgia Guidestones which outlines the NWO's agenda to reduce and murder billions on this planet. They're so contemptuous of us that they write it in stone and we still don't get it!

These are the Georgia Guidestones;

Image

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

So, following her expert advice, I'm going to ignore them.

The infallible word of god is vindicated again. Revelations 13:11 says;

And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.


And that ended the day's sermon.

It must be true about Justice Leask, I found a website supporting her!

http://gangstersout.com/peter_leask.htm

A very poorly presented website, dark blue text on a black background. But putting that quibble aside the website puts out a clarion call for action;

Peter Leask should be hanged for Treason

Who wrote that, Glenn Fearn? It would help if the blogger in charge of it could actually spell the name of the country he lives in, might give him a touch more credibility;

Two-thirds of Candains back electing judges

Those damn Candains, always sticking their noses into Canadian affairs.

Now, as to my apparently offensive comment about her brained damaged son. I'm just trying to be neutral by using Suzanne's own wording in describing her child as given here;

http://judicialreform2012.blogspot.ca/

On May 18, 2007 the BC Court of Appeal remanded this case for spoliation hearings (ie destroyed medical documents regarding my son's botched birth)[#CA_______]. During spoliation hearings when my son turned 19 years old, Mr. Justice Brooke of the BC Supreme Court ordered that my brain damaged son was to either hire a lawyer or conduct his own litigation, neither of which my son could do as no lawyer in BC wanted this case and my brain damaged son was incapable of representing himself. I was disallowed to represent him any further after representing him successfully for 2 years to the point that we were almost ready for trial. Mr. Justice Brooke then disallowed me subpoena for the last pieces of information against the doctors and cut the spoliation hearings off prematurely, ruling against my son and I. At an ex parte hearing with no representation, Madam Justice Ross on November 4, 2008 ruled against my son via an empty chair, dismissing his entire claim! Subsequently, I attempted to represent my son at the BC Court of Appeal [#CA036649] with 2 psychological reports giving proof to my son's brain damage, with no reports to the contrary. Despite said reports the appeals court ruled my son was not a person under disability, although the Province of British Columbia had deemed my son to be a person with disability. Prior to the hearing of the appeal, before a 3 justice panel on a motions hearing, opposing counsel disputed the prior assessment for the first time. We sought a third assessment, which upheld the prior assessments, re-confirming my son's brain damage. Even though the assessment was expedited, it took a year. The new assessment could not have been sought until the prior assessment had been challenged in the court of appeal before Madam Justice Levine. She refused, and subsequent panels refused, to first adjourn and await the new report which addressed the challenges raised by opposing counsel; and then refused to received or hear the new evidence (reconfirming the earlier evidence, impeaching the challenge by opposing counsel, and impeaching Madam Justice Levine's "decision".). Later, before another 3 justice panel, the entire case was dismissed, not letting me say 1 word, refusing to receive or accept the impeaching evidence, and then humiliating my son in open court by making him stand up before a 3 justice panel and say he was incapable of arguing his case. All he could do is ask the court to allow me or someone to represent him (which the panel headed by Madam Justice Prowse denied). Ironically, this humiliation of a disabled person took place the same day Prime Minister Stephen Harper was ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canada's behalf, 11 March 2010.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs


Return to “Canada”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Common Crawl [Bot] and 0 guests