Suzanne Holland Chief Justice of the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot’in Nation
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:48 pm
Does this name ring any bells with anyone?
Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/
because Tenne-sean is believin'Burnaby49 wrote:
I don't know why they are involved in Tennessee though.
Chaos wrote:because Tenne-sean is believin'Burnaby49 wrote:
I don't know why they are involved in Tennessee though.
And;21. In July and August 2015, Mr. Bryfogle wrote several letters to various governmental agencies purportedly on behalf of the Chilcotin National Congress regarding several matters, including:
a. the placement of children in the care of the MCFD (Souvage #4 at pp. 88, 91);
b. the use of various school buildings in Williams Lake area (Souvage #4 at p 87);
c. the logging rights of forestry companies operating in the Williams Lake area and the establishment of a new police force and forestry warden system (Souvage #4 at p. 90); and
d. the purported revocation and replacement of provincial legislation regarding community care licensing (Souvage #4 at p.89).
22. Between July and October, 2015, Mr. Bryfogle informed the Law Society that he had been appointed the Minister of Child and Family Services as well as the Attorney General and Solicitor General for the Chilcotin National Congress. Mr. Bryfogle expressed his belief that he was a “public officer” and, as such, the Legal Profession Act had no application over his actions in this regard. The Law Society informed Mr. Bryfogle of its belief that he was not a “public officer” as defined in the Interpretation Act, that it did not know the specific nature of his involvement with the Chilcotin National Congress and that it was concerned that he was involving himself in the legal matters of others.
Souvage #4 at pp. 8-75
23. Although he generally informed the Law Society of his ‘appointments’ and that he intended to challenge the jurisdiction of MCFD, Mr. Bryfogle did not inform the Law Society of the letters he had written to the government or of his specific involvement in each of those matters.
Which somewhat upset the real Chicoltin Nation, an actual legitimate aboriginal band;9. Through third parties, the Law Society obtained copies of several of the letters that Mr. Bryfogle has written to government officials in March and April 2016. In one such letter (described in Mr. Bryfogle’s letter to the Law Society on March 29, 2016 as “Bill Bennett [Mines] Abrogation of Mines Legislation; Intent to Sue”) Mr. Bryfogle wrote, in part:
Negotiation or Litigation
The Chilcotin National Congress is prepared to negotiate with BC to address transition for issues arising with those holding BC licenses. Notice is separately given to several firms involved in mining or mining exploration in the Tsilhqot’in. Your ministry has until May 15 2016 to inform this office whether you, or your designate, is prepared to work out how existing licenses and permits are to proceed, and what revenue stream is due to the Tsilhqot’in, and whether the five statutes now suspended, are to be abrogated, or modified to confirm to Tsilhqot’in concerns. ... [sic, emphasis original]
10. In addition to failing to inform the Law Society about his letters to various forestry companies, Mr. Bryfogle has not informed the Law Society of the “notice” he gave to “several firms involved in mining” or of his involvement in those matters.
11. On April 21, 2016, Mr. Bryfogle phoned the corporate office of New Gold Inc.- a company with mining interests in the Chilcotin-Cariboo Region. Mr. Bryfogle stated he was representing the Tsilhqot’in and that some of the company’s mines may be in Tsilhqot’in territory. Mr. Bryfogle stated that he was drafting a new “Mining Act” and intended to bring criminal indictments against another aboriginal group if he determined that group was receiving money from the company for a mine found in Tsilhqot’in territory.
This was like opening Fibber McGee's closet. An unthinking act that precipitated a landslide. I've actually never seen so much litigation involving a specific person not named Trump. If I got diligent I don't doubt I could double the number of cases I've found relating to Suzanne and the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot'in Nation. I could be months analizing it all and putting it into presentable shape to satisfy Notorial's casual curiosity. If I do it won't be done anytime soon. For some bizarre reason beyond my understanding Mrs. Burnaby49 thinks that babysitting our grandson so that our daughter-in-law can go back to work is more important than endless hours parsing insignificant court decisions. Women![11] There was also an affidavit from Chief Roger William, the Vice-Chair of the Chilcotin National Government, who deposed as to the significant efforts he and the other chiefs comprising the board of directors of the TNG have taken to establish relations with government agencies and industry to improve the lives of the members of the Chilcotin Nation. He recounted his knowledge of Mr. Bryfogle’s past dealings with the Chilcotin National Congress and he deposed as follows at paragraphs 31 to 34:
31. As Tsilhqot’in Chiefs, we encourage participation by our members and we highly value and respect our elders and our former leadership. We welcome debate and differences of view within our Nation − this is healthy. I have a lot of respect for Stanley Stump and others that speak the Tsilhqot’in language, came up in a traditional way, and served our people in the past.
32. However, I am deeply concerned by the actions of Mr. Bryfogle. To me, his letters and his actions show a lack of respect for our Nation. It is insulting and disrespectful that he is not a member of our Nation, does not share our experience or history, but claims to speak and act on behalf of the Tsilhqot’in people to government, industry and the public.
33. The conduct of Mr. Bryfogle is increasingly troubling for our Nation. As a result of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada, we have a historic opportunity, as Chiefs, to create a better future for our people. We are negotiating with British Columbia to improve the lives of our members. We are working to change outdated attitudes in government, industry, and the public. We are committed to demonstrating stable, responsible good government as Tsilhqot’in people.
34. I am deeply concerned that Mr. Bryfogle’s letters to government and industry (among others) may undermine these efforts. I am concerned that, left to continue in this manner, Mr. Bryfogle will damage the reputation of the Tsilhqot’in Nation, create uncertainty about who speaks for the Tsilhqot’in Nation and cause unnecessary fear and conflict.
Damn, Burnaby. That series ended in the 50's. And I had to look it up to realize that.Burnaby49 wrote:This was like opening Fibber McGee's closet.
You young people have no memory of the classics.wserra wrote:Damn, Burnaby. That series ended in the 50's. And I had to look it up to realize that.Burnaby49 wrote:This was like opening Fibber McGee's closet.
Well I thought I'd dabble just a little, get my feet wet by picking a sample litigation that didn't really lead anywhere, just something limited that I could use as an example of their overall litigation style. The only thing that bright idea proved is that I'm a total fucking idiot. All of Holland and Bryfogle's litigation leads everywhere, there are no limits. There's no discernable end to it, every door you open leads to ten new doors. A decision would note a prior case so I'd check on it. And get something like this;This was like opening Fibber McGee's closet. An unthinking act that precipitated a landslide. I've actually never seen so much litigation involving a specific person not named Trump. If I got diligent I don't doubt I could double the number of cases I've found relating to Suzanne and the Universal Supreme Court of the Tsilhqot'in Nation.
I am going through Bryfogle's litigation history in respect to the injunction against him barring him from pretending to be a lawyer. I'm trying, against the odds, to write that one up. But even there rigid discipline is required to avoid straying off the path and getting lost in the vast thickets of his other litigation. This is how the court views him;[28] The irony is that Ms. Holland has been the recipient of an extraordinary amount of judicial time and court services, likely at the expense of others waiting to proceed with litigation more deserving of the court's attention, and certainly at the expense of the many defendants whose blameless reputations she has sought to besmirch. She has nevertheless ignored every finding, ruling and judgment she has received, at least until I found in her favour on March 18, 2011. She did not decline the $1,500.
[29] In the circumstances, I am satisfied that this is an appropriate case for the award of special costs. Moreover, given the sorry history of Ms. Holland's scorched-earth approach to litigation, I have no hesitation in concluding that it is appropriate to make lump sum awards to each of the defendants. To require them to go through the process of assessment would merely subject them to further abuse and yet more expense.
[66] An equally overwhelming case has been presented for granting the order sought under s.18 of the Supreme Court Act. I find that Mr. Bryfogle is out of control in abusing the process of the courts with unnecessary, frivolous and vexatious litigation. He has been running amok without regard for the needless stress and expense to defendants that his reprehensible conduct is creating, and without even accepting responsibility in ordinary costs for his failures. I am satisfied that an order under s.18 provides the only reasonable prospect of limiting the harm that he would otherwise inflict.
[67] The time is long overdue that special costs should be awarded to deter Mr. Bryfogle from the reprehensible abuse of process that this action represents.
[68] For all of the above reasons this action is dismissed and the order is granted under s.18 of the Supreme Court Act in the terms of that section requiring Mr. Bryfogle to obtain leave of the court before instituting any legal proceeding in any court. All with special costs to the defendants.
Wow. Simply wow. She has taken sovrunhood straight into major felonyhood."Based on initial telephone conversations, Ms. Holland and the source agreed to draft a contract, signed by both parties, describing duties and payments. A final negotiated price of $250,000 was agreed upon for the arrest of the sheriff and judge and the facilitating release of Mike Parsons from jail," the Department of Justice said. "Mike Parsons was described as an Associate Justice of the Tshilhqot'in Nation."