Why use "term" and not "word"

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean

Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Why use "term" and not "word"

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7701

In the definitions page we find that instead of defining words,it defines "terms".

Can anyone explain why?

Blacks 4th

TERM . A word or phrase; an expression; particularly one which possesses a fixed or known meaning in some science, art,
or profession

Webster 1828

TERM. 1. A limit; a bound or boundary; the extremity of anything; that which limits it extent.

Are these definitions correct? Does the use of term limit the words of art after its use?
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7559
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: Why use "term" and not "word"

Post by wserra »

Patriotdiscussions wrote:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7701

In the definitions page we find that instead of defining words,it defines "terms".
Can anyone explain why?
Because several of the "terms" that 26 USC § 7701 defines - "Secretary of the Treasury", “military or naval forces of the United States”, “Armed Forces of the United States”, "withholding agent", "international organization", “domestic building and loan association”, many others - consist of more than one word. Master of the bleedin' obvious.

Now, I'm sure that you have some conspiratorial explanation born of a room-temperature IQ, but you'll have to find some unsuspecting forum on which to inflict it.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume