Re: DMVP in the news
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:56 pm
Would that not be treason?NYGman wrote: Again, what if the Judge does not believe in God? Who is to say who is right, DMVP or the Judge.
Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/
Would that not be treason?NYGman wrote: Again, what if the Judge does not believe in God? Who is to say who is right, DMVP or the Judge.
So DMVP is ordering the mayor of a city, to make a settlement on behalf of a state, paid by the national government.The Observer wrote:I noticed in his 377 page screed regarding his suit against the mayor of Colorado Springs
David has increased his damages from $20 million to $23 million, apparently hoping that it will put pressure on the State of Colorado to pay up. The following statement appears in his fevered gibberish:
Please sign a proper oath of office, that includes God (spelled in lawful form) for your Witness and then order a check be cut from the US Treasury for $23,000,000.00 and mailed to me at the above address.
The vowels were never written -- the unwritten name of God may be YHWH (Yahweh) or JHVH (Jehovah), but I don't think he can find any authority (other than himself ) for the vowels.JamesVincent wrote:I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be Yahweh (YHWH) but I'm not a religious guru like DMVP.
Well, it cannot be Jehovah since some of the sounds for the letters are not represented in the Hebrew language. All we know is that the letters are YHWH - and that it could be a number of possibilities.Arthur Rubin wrote:The vowels were never written -- the unwritten name of God may be YHWH (Yahweh) or JHVH (Jehovah), but I don't think he can find any authority (other than himself ) for the vowels.JamesVincent wrote:I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be Yahweh (YHWH) but I'm not a religious guru like DMVP.
Yes, but David has a method to his madness and vice versa. As pointed out earlier, the mayor was a former DA who went up against David. For his perceived wrong of not having an oath of office that met David's tortured interpretation of the laws covering government officials, David figures he is owed some money. Ergo, the mayor has to pay up.TheNewSaint wrote:So DMVP is ordering the mayor of a city, to make a settlement on behalf of a state, paid by the national government.
All of David's thought processes end up at "David figures he is owed some money."The Observer wrote:Yes, but David has a method to his madness and vice versa. As pointed out earlier, the mayor was a former DA who went up against David. For his perceived wrong of not having an oath of office that met David's tortured interpretation of the laws covering government officials, David figures he is owed some money.
The best way to discredit David is to quote David.AndyK wrote:Just a reminder to all:
David is banned here.
So, no cheap shots or insults to someone who is blocked from defending himself.