Stewart Rhodes / Oath Keepers

[Demosthenes]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jjmacnab/20 ... disbarred/

Based upon the foregoing factual findings and legal conclusions, the Commission makes the following recommendation:

1. That Elmer S. Rhodes be disbarred;

2. That he be required to comply with the notice provisions of Rule 30, MRLDE upon disbarment; and

3. That he be assessed the reasonable and necessary costs of these proceedings in accordance with Rule 9A(8), MRLDE.

[Pottapaug1938]

He'll probably just switch over to practicing before some "common law court" held in some facility's back room or in a disused warehouse space in an industrial park.

[grixit]

I have a great idea for those common law courts. In disputes between freepeeps, the accused has the right to trial by combat at the nearest paintball field of honor.

[bmxninja357]

He'll probably just switch over to practicing before some "common law court" held in some facility's back room or in a disused warehouse space in an industrial park.

I think Dennys needs more people's lawyers.

Dennys, come for the breakfast, stay for the common law court verdict. Quite often the verdict is delicious!

Freeman. Free refills. Seems legit.

Peace
Ninj

[pigpot]

I have a great idea for those common law courts. In disputes between freepeeps, the accused has the right to trial by combat at the nearest paintball field of honor.

Forget common law and also natural law like gravity. Let's depend upon "Statutory Law". Where men make "rules" to govern others... It's the only way to go... Forget the no harm no loss principle. That's all in the past. Police in schools is a good thing. Camera's in your homes and an Orwellian State is great. Aldous Huxley got it wrong and "V for Vendetta" is b()llshit.

Rod Stewart is excellent though...

[Jeffrey]

Must resist the urge to respond to pigpot's baiting.

[Gregg]

I have cameras in my home, but what you need to fear is the detachment of the 699th Airborne Assault Dachshund Regiment that provides day to day security.

[grixit]

Longdogs!

[wserra]

Once again: pigpot is moderated, as is Joinder. Any posts which do nothing more than take potshots at them put mods in the position of having to allow them to reply or deleting the post. I will generally delete the post.

[Chaos]

Once again: pigpot is moderated, as is Joinder. Any posts which do nothing more than take potshots at them put mods in the position of having to allow them to reply or deleting the post. I will generally delete the post.

I'm still trying to figure out why people keep quoting them knowing full well others have followed the rules and put them on ignore because they don't want to see their trolling.

[Hanslune]

I'm still trying to figure out why people keep quoting them knowing full well others have followed the rules and put them on ignore because they don't want to see their trolling.

What we have an ignore function? Pray tell where is this well sought for solution?

[Judge Roy Bean]

What we have an ignore function? Pray tell where is this well sought for solution?

User control panel - friends and foes, select foes and enter the usernames of those you wish to ignore.

A wonderful time-saving feature.

[morrand]

What we have an ignore function? Pray tell where is this well sought for solution?

User control panel - friends and foes, select foes and enter the usernames of those you wish to ignore.

A wonderful time-saving feature.

Or, even quicker: click the user's name at the top of a post, and then, on the next screen, click, "Add as foe."

[Hanslune]

What we have an ignore function? Pray tell where is this well sought for solution?

User control panel - friends and foes, select foes and enter the usernames of those you wish to ignore.

A wonderful time-saving feature.

Or, even quicker: click the user's name at the top of a post, and then, on the next screen, click, "Add as foe."

Ah thanks - success the term "FOE" I didn't associate with the result of "ignore".

[grixit]

Yeah, it seems a bit excessive. Perhaps Webhick can change it next time she patches the code.

[Hanslune]

Yeah, it seems a bit excessive. Perhaps Webhick can change it next time she patches the code.

Yes I would suggest making it quite clear: 'Click here to ignore this person's posts'.