Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:26 pm
Unfortunately my wife has taken to going to his 'seminars' which feature 3-inch binders full of unintelligible garbage. I thought they stopped lobotomizing people years ago until I flipped through some of this stuff. I can tell you one thing at least, if this movement gets much bigger I will buy major stock in every hyphen manufacturer out there.
This guy looks like a hater and conspiracy monger of the first order to boot. It is nice to see that at least some filings are rejected for being "voluminous and indecipherable" but unfortunately that hasn't caught on as much as it should.
http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDC ... v.%20OBAMA
Anyone know more about this guy from a SovCit perspective?
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 4962
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Okay, then. What the eff am I paying for, then, if what Phelps charges obscene amounts of those disgusting FRNs to deign to teach us has no warranty of success? If I'm a sovrun Preamble citizen of the united States, I'm not the least bit interested in "historical and informational purposes". I wanna beat the IRS!
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: New York, NY
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
- Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:02 am
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
- Warder of the Quatloosian Gibbet
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:43 pm
Pottapaug1938 wrote:"The author makes no claims or guarantees as to your success when using the process taught in this course. The seminar is taught for historical and informational purposes only. The user of this process is solely responsible for his success or failure if involved in any legal or equitable procedure whatsoever."
That's the written version. The verbal claims are another matter entirely.
- Princeps Wooloosia
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:50 pm
I am not sure this is the same guy but: In 1989 the Penn. Superior Court threw out the appeal by an Eric J. Phelps against a sentence of a $100 fine and a jail term of up to one year for a (undescribed) misdemeanor and three traffic offenses, on Phelps's argument that he was, somehow, immune to the laws because he had relinquished "all property rights" to the State of Pennsylvania. Commonwealth v. Eric J. Phelps (1989) 388 Penn.Super 624, 566 A2d 303, petit.den (Penn.Supm. 1990) 525 Penn 663, 583 A2d 793, cert.den (1991) 498 US 1088.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Common Crawl [Bot] and 0 guests