Oregon Malheur Trial

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean

Duke2Earl
Eighth Operator of the Delusional Mooloo
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 10:09 pm
Location: Neverland

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Duke2Earl »

I have no doubt whatsoever that these lovely people will give the government another chance in the not too distant future. Stay tuned.
My choice early in life was to either be a piano player in a whorehouse or a politican. And to tell the truth there's hardly any difference.

Harry S Truman
Tuba Cain
Scalawag
Scalawag
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:09 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Tuba Cain »

wserra wrote:
Tuba Cain wrote:In what can only be considered proof that these jackasses had a jury of their peers, the Bundys et al have been acquitted.
Were you present for the trial? If not, you don't know that.

Sustained. Still gobsmacked though.
"The only thing which may accurately be said of a man who believes himself to be a poached egg is that he is in the minority" - James Burke, "The Day the Universe Changed"
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7502
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by The Observer »

I am guessing the jury was really trying to send a message about their feelings over the father-son ranching team that had been sent back to prison; in that light, they probably transferred their sympathy to the Malheur Malcontents, since the claim is this is why the Bundy team came to Oregon in the first place.

As pointed out, there is a another trial awaiting some of these defendants in Nevada, along with Cliven Bundy. Again, there is a segment of the population who sympathize with the Bundys and the perceived high-handedness of BLM in the past. The prosecution team should be learning all they can from the Oregon trial and not make the same mistakes.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3704
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 6:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Judge Roy Bean »

I haven't seen the jury instructions at this point, but I would only point out that conspiracy is a tough nut to crack because it deals with the state of mind of the accused.

Are there other charges pending?
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
jcolvin2
Grand Master Consul of Quatloosia
Posts: 822
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 3:19 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by jcolvin2 »

Interesting interview with Juror No 4:

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-stando ... aj-story-1
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Judge Roy Bean wrote:I haven't seen the jury instructions at this point, but I would only point out that conspiracy is a tough nut to crack because it deals with the state of mind of the accused.

Are there other charges pending?
If I spot them I'll put a link up. They will be somewhere in Jack Ryan's stuff. There are no other charges pending in Oregon, it all moves to Nevada in Feb 2017 for the Bunkerville related trial and there are a whole load more charges in that case. The only things left to deal with in Oregon are the people who plead guilty and one attempt at a change of plea from guilty to not guilty, IIRC.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7502
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by The Observer »

Juror No. 4 wrote:The jury, he said, met with Judge Brown after the verdicts were announced and after the U.S. Marshals' physical confrontation and arrest of Bundy lawyer Marcus Mumford.

He said many of the jurors questioned the judge about why the federal government chose the "conspiracy charge.'' He said he learned that a potential alternate charge, such as criminal trespass, wouldn't have brought as significant a penalty.
So the Nevada prosecution needs to weigh the risk of swinging for the fences.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by notorial dissent »

I am still gobsmacked, but yeah.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
Tuba Cain
Scalawag
Scalawag
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:09 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Tuba Cain »

With respects to my previous comments about the jury, I would like to publicly retract any suggestion that they were of the same ilk as the Bundys or the associated gaggle of deranged buffoons.

It appears as though they truly did not believe that the prosecution made their case; and, having devoted as ass chapping amout of time following this trial - as I know many of you have as well - I can honestly say that I can see where they're coming from.

I suspect the prosecution thought they had a cakewalk on their hands, and ended up fumbling.
"The only thing which may accurately be said of a man who believes himself to be a poached egg is that he is in the minority" - James Burke, "The Day the Universe Changed"
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by TheNewSaint »

Judge Roy Bean wrote:I haven't seen the jury instructions at this point, but I would only point out that conspiracy is a tough nut to crack because it deals with the state of mind of the accused.
But these defendants published reams of material on social media explaining their state of mind in great detail. If you can't convict this bunch for conspiracy, who can you?
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6107
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ammon- ... ar-AAjv40e

“It gave Ammon a chance to explain his side,” Lewis & Clark Law Professor Tung Yin told the Daily News. “And apparently the jury seemed to agree. I think it’s really hard to see this as anything other than jury nullification.”
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

TheNewSaint wrote:
Judge Roy Bean wrote:I haven't seen the jury instructions at this point, but I would only point out that conspiracy is a tough nut to crack because it deals with the state of mind of the accused.
But these defendants published reams of material on social media explaining their state of mind in great detail. If you can't convict this bunch for conspiracy, who can you?
Having slept on this outcome, I agree with the judge in part because I think the jury hasn't understood "conspiracy". They were looking for a Facebook event of "Occupy the Malheur Refuge and stop the government getting back in" and expecting the accused to be in the list of "definitely going". The prosecution failed to make it absolutely clear that the accused had agreed to do something which, as a consequence, caused something else. As an outcome, I can see that this will change the approach with the Nevada trial, and Nevada will concentrate on "black and white" evidence of the type "here's a picture of a previously convicted felon with a firearm".
And I still haven't spotted the actual jury instructions, there are motions to change them but not the actual things themselves.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
Rakked
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:22 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Rakked »

After all these folks have gotten away with, I'm almost not surprised at this.

Ah well. There's still Nevada. I'll keep my fingers crossed for the prosecutors there.
An evildoer gives heed to false lips;
A liar listens eagerly to a spiteful tongue.
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Jeffrey »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:Having slept on this outcome, I agree with the judge in part because I think the jury hasn't understood "conspiracy". They were looking for a Facebook event of "Occupy the Malheur Refuge and stop the government getting back in" and expecting the accused to be in the list of "definitely going". The prosecution failed to make it absolutely clear that the accused had agreed to do something which, as a consequence, caused something else.
After sleeping on it myself, I'm with the Jury. The prosecution charged them with impeding government workers then didn't prove that they conspired to do that. And as Fogbow pointed out, the prosecution had evidence that the Bundys intended to impede government workers but did not show it at the trial. This is like me robbing a bank, then having the government charge me with impeding the bank workers from doing their job. Clearly my goal was not to block the teller from doing her job, my goal was to get the banks money.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Jeffrey wrote:This is like me robbing a bank, then having the government charge me with impeding the bank workers from doing their job. Clearly my goal was not to block the teller from doing her job, my goal was to get the banks money.
I think we might be in agreement here. My point is that you have impeded the tellers from doing their job, but it needs explaining how that is connected.(*) It also raises the point that there could have been "better" or a more comprehensive list of charges. That was a further thought I had. Why wasn't a range of charges used? Like Sedition at the highest level to trespass/camping without a permit at the lowest. I can see that the prosecution might want to keep it simple but the doubt of the jury over the one main charge has meant that the prosecution have come away with nothing.
(* I'm thinking of situations like kidnap charges when an armed robber says "nobody move" or "nobody leaves" - the consequences of the situation are that the scenario is kidnap under the law. The robber didn't set out to kidnap anyone, they set out to carry out a robbery, but the consequences and the law can be explained to a jury and they can convict in that situation. Ask O J Simpson.)
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by notorial dissent »

I never understood why they went with the conspiracy charge to begin with, they are notoriously hard to prove, as witness the outcome here. I would have thought there were other equally good substantive charges they could have gone with that would have worked better, but then IANAL, but I do think it was an uphill battle that they chose the route they did. That and they didn't do a very good job of selling it IMHO.

The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

notorial dissent wrote:I never understood why they went with the conspiracy charge to begin with, they are notoriously hard to prove, as witness the outcome here. I would have thought there were other equally good substantive charges they could have gone with that would have worked better, but then IANAL, but I do think it was an uphill battle that they chose the route they did. That and they didn't do a very good job of selling it IMHO.

I think the conspiracy charge has a "domino" effect or element to it. If you convince the jury that one or two people conspired, there is a tendency to agree that they all did. You get an all or nothing set of convictions or acquittals.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by notorial dissent »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:
notorial dissent wrote:I never understood why they went with the conspiracy charge to begin with, they are notoriously hard to prove, as witness the outcome here. I would have thought there were other equally good substantive charges they could have gone with that would have worked better, but then IANAL, but I do think it was an uphill battle that they chose the route they did. That and they didn't do a very good job of selling it IMHO.

I think the conspiracy charge has a "domino" effect or element to it. If you convince the jury that one or two people conspired, there is a tendency to agree that they all did. You get an all or nothing set of convictions or acquittals.
And there is pretty much the problem, the all or nothing part, as this one proved.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by TheNewSaint »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:there could have been "better" or a more comprehensive list of charges. That was a further thought I had. Why wasn't a range of charges used? Like Sedition at the highest level to trespass/camping without a permit at the lowest.
How about domestic terrorism?
18 U.S. Code § 2331 wrote:(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
Though I can see some technical reasons this might not work. Did they commit any "acts dangerous to human life"? Does attempting to influence a criminal sentencing qualify as "influencing the policy of a government"? There's also the matter of proving the "violation of criminal laws", though I think that would be easy if the laws of any state can be applied. I'm sure their arsenal runs afoul of gun ownership laws in more restrictive states.

Is this a route that could have been taken? Would proving it have been a bridge too far?
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Jeffrey »

Good article on Oregonlive discussing this issue:

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-stando ... _big-photo
Steve Wax, a former federal public defender who now directs Oregon's Innocence Project, said he had wondered at the outset of the arrests why prosecutors didn't seek a more serious charge, something that would have given the case more gravitas and signaled that the occupation broke the barriers of mere protest.

A charge of seditious conspiracy, for instance, alleges two or more people conspired to "by force to seize, take or possess any property of the United States" without authority. It brings prison sentences of up to 20 years.
I'm with Wax, the stated goal of the takeover was sedition, not to "impede government workers".