Oregon Malheur Trial

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean

morrand
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:42 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by morrand »

TheNewSaint wrote:
How about domestic terrorism?
......
Though I can see some technical reasons this might not work. Did they commit any "acts dangerous to human life"? Does attempting to influence a criminal sentencing qualify as "influencing the policy of a government"? There's also the matter of proving the "violation of criminal laws", though I think that would be easy if the laws of any state can be applied. I'm sure their arsenal runs afoul of gun ownership laws in more restrictive states.

Is this a route that could have been taken? Would proving it have been a bridge too far?
Whether it could legally have stuck or not, charging them with "terrorism" in any way would almost certainly have been a bridge too far. That is a very loaded term. With these defendants, I'm almost certain the last thing the prosecution would want to have done in a jury trial is to pave the way for a "terrorists...or freedom fighters?" defense.
---
Morrand
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by grixit »

I suspect we're going to see sovs comparing Malheur to Fort Sumter.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
Tuba Cain
Scalawag
Scalawag
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:09 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Tuba Cain »

grixit wrote:I suspect we're going to see sovs comparing Malheur to Fort Sumter.
Totally agree. This is already going down in the Sovcit Annals (that is to say, facebook) as some hybrid of the Alamo and the explosion of USS Maine.
"The only thing which may accurately be said of a man who believes himself to be a poached egg is that he is in the minority" - James Burke, "The Day the Universe Changed"
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by grixit »

Remember the Dildos!
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by TheNewSaint »

Jeffrey wrote:Good article on Oregonlive discussing this issue:

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-stando ... _big-photo
Steve Wax, a former federal public defender who now directs Oregon's Innocence Project, said he had wondered at the outset of the arrests why prosecutors didn't seek a more serious charge, something that would have given the case more gravitas and signaled that the occupation broke the barriers of mere protest.

A charge of seditious conspiracy, for instance, alleges two or more people conspired to "by force to seize, take or possess any property of the United States" without authority. It brings prison sentences of up to 20 years.
I'm with Wax, the stated goal of the takeover was sedition, not to "impede government workers".
I couldn't agree more. I always found the conspiracy charge unsatisfying; their acts should have warranted much more serious charges than that. Seditious conspiracy would have worked. I wonder why the prosecution didn't try for that.
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by TheNewSaint »

morrand wrote:Whether it could legally have stuck or not, charging them with "terrorism" in any way would almost certainly have been a bridge too far. That is a very loaded term. With these defendants, I'm almost certain the last thing the prosecution would want to have done in a jury trial is to pave the way for a "terrorists...or freedom fighters?" defense.
Eh, you're probably right. Plus, I'm far from sure that their acts meet the technical definition. Seditious conspiracy would have been a better choice.
User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2271
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by NYGman »

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-stando ... nue_t.html
It was our duty to stand. We did it peacefully. We did it legally, and the jury's verdicts confirmed that,'' Bundy said during a phone call with The Oregonian/OregonLive from the Multnomah County Detention Center.
Not exactly what the Jury said. They did find not guilty of Conspiracy, but that is a far cry from their actions being legal. Just because the Jury didn't agree with the conspiracy charge, does not mean that they exonerated the Bundy clan and crew or that their actions were in fact legal It isn't a hard concept to grasp. Not Guilty isn't exactly a finding of innocence.
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3704
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 6:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Judge Roy Bean »

'Round here we'd a put in a bunch of things to make sure something stuck, for examples:

(1) Makin' a mess of stuff that wasn't theirs.
(2) Botherin' people they had no business botherin'.
(3) Stickin' their noses in where they didn't belong.
(4) Bein' a public nuisance.
(5) Wastin' law-enforcement resources.
(6) General jackassery.

That last one can get you 90 days all by itself.

:snicker:
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
rogfulton
Caveat Venditor
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:08 am
Location: No longer behind the satellite dish, second door along - in fact, not even in the same building.

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by rogfulton »

Here's a NY Times article about the verdict.
"No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we require him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not asked as a favor."
- President Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2271
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by NYGman »

http://uproxx.com/news/oregon-militants ... -standoff/

Quoting the Declaration of Independence as your legal justification for future actions is genius. :sarcasmon:
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Jeffrey »

I realize this makes me a bad person but I look forward to that.
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by TheNewSaint »

Jeffrey wrote:I realize this makes me a bad person but I look forward to that.
I don't. Their next stunt will just put more lives in danger, waste more government resources, and embolden more like-minded individuals.
AndyK
Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:13 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by AndyK »

These self-proclaimed freedom fighters / sons of liberty clearly don't have a clue.

Just because they managed to evade a poorly-constructed charge doesn't prove (as they seem to interpret things) they were right.

In fact, whatever stunt they pull next will probably dealt with much more severely than was their occupation of the refuge. If they proceed with their blather about overthrowing the government, they won't have time to realize what is happening to them until it is over.

The government is better armed, more fit, more organized than they are and infinitely outnumbers them. One can only hope that they will initiate some acts of sufficient violence to warrant results which will eliminate the need for any future trials.
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7502
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by The Observer »

AndyK wrote:The government is better armed, more fit, more organized than they are and infinitely outnumbers them
And yet the government failed to take advantage of those strengths a couple of years ago when confronted by the armed idiots in Bunkerville. That decision only fueled the Bundites' belief that the government would back down when having to face armed opponents. Hence the Malheur takeover. If the Bundy's also get off in their Nevada trial, be prepared to see an increase in armed confrontations throughout the western US.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Jeffrey »

The Observer wrote:And yet the government failed to take advantage of those strengths a couple of years ago when confronted by the armed idiots in Bunkerville.
This is still America despite the efforts of the Bundy's and others. We don't kill dissidents.
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by notorial dissent »

I have to agree with Andy, I think the OR team really did a poor job with that they had been given to work with. One of the comments made by other lawyers on Fogbow that referred to the the lawyers and judges there as "fluffy", where the NV crowd seem to be anything but. So I guess we'll see when the rubber meets the road. The difference too, is that the charges that will be tried in NV are considerable more severe and the charges seem to be more of the concrete variety rather than hard to prove conspiracy charges. Again, we will see what happens when it comes time.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7502
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by The Observer »

Jeffrey wrote:
The Observer wrote:And yet the government failed to take advantage of those strengths a couple of years ago when confronted by the armed idiots in Bunkerville.
This is still America despite the efforts of the Bundy's and others. We don't kill dissidents.
Dissidents? Armed with semi-automatic rifles? Taking up sniper positions to kill law enforcement? And planning to use women and children as human shields?

That is hardly the definition of a dissident.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by notorial dissent »

Terrorist, sovcit whackjob, yeah, dissident, NO!!!!!
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by Jeffrey »

I tried to find a neutral term for them. And I'll rephrase it, we avoid shooting them as much as possible.
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7502
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Oregon Malheur Trial

Post by The Observer »

Jeffrey wrote:I tried to find a neutral term for them. And I'll rephrase it, we avoid shooting them as much as possible.
Not always. Think Ruby Ridge and Waco. Both situations were situations where shooting could have been avoided, but did not happen. The problem is one of government mismanagement of a situation and emboldening the sovrun idiots or handing them a propaganda victory. Because of the government's inconsistent approach and handling, the movement is always looking like they have pulled one over on Uncle Sam. Regardless of whether the government shoots or doesn't shoot.

I still wonder today at why the court system thought it was a good idea to allow Ed Brown to attend his trial and go home at night. He had already been bellowing about not participating in his trial ahead of time and how he would just turn his residence into a war zone. And that is exactly what he did. That was another situation that could have been avoided.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff