OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean

Heather will decide to head for the hills:

Before her next hearing
1
3%
After her next hearing
2
7%
Before her trial
10
34%
Before her sentencing
13
45%
Never - she wants to experience BEing and DOing behind bars.
3
10%
 
Total votes: 29

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby TheNewSaint » Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:24 pm

I didn't find anything recent, but I did find this awful story:

http://i-uv.com/freedom-story-another-t ... n-package/

Yesterday, I sat with a dear friend who had become so fearful and despondent over bill collectors and money drama that she tried to suicide.

I had told her about OPPT, but she hadn’t really taken on board how it could change her life. So, I told her to gather the ones that were making her life miserable, and I printed out a bunch of CNs, and together, we filled them out.

I had her read the first one out loud. It was such a joy to watch her move from fear and hopelessness into the realization that those things would never again make her afraid, and from there into Absolute Empowerment.

She was giggling and laughing as the implications of how the CNs cover ALL the bases sunk in.

For me, THAT is Magic!


That's just tragic, and infuriating. Someone at the lowest point of their life for financial reasons, gets pulled into this OPPT nonsense and makes their situation worse. There isn't a circle of hell low enough for people like this.

I wonder what happened to this person later.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10622
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby notorial dissent » Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:38 pm

I quite agree, and I shudder to think what happened after the OPPT nonsense crashed and burned for them. I really have no patience for the prosperity crowd. The damage they do is incalcuable.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby NYGman » Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:58 pm

I picture maniacal laughter, and the person totally cracking up, losing all grasp of reality. Que https://youtu.be/hnzHtm1jhL4
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.

waylonmercy
Stowaway
Stowaway
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:51 pm

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby waylonmercy » Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:29 am

In a new recorded call from jail, Randy Beane told Mike O'Brien that he bought the $500,000 RV to help humanity.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05WANRUJqFw
Lives are going to be in Waylon Mercy's hands.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10622
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby notorial dissent » Fri Sep 15, 2017 4:28 am

waylonmercy wrote:In a new recorded call from jail, Randy Beane told Mike O'Brien that he bought the $500,000 RV to help humanity.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05WANRUJqFw

Of course he did.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3528
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby Judge Roy Bean » Fri Sep 15, 2017 7:34 pm

waylonmercy wrote:In a new recorded call from jail, Randy Beane told Mike O'Brien that he bought the $500,000 RV to help humanity. ...


Nothing like spending a half-mil of someone else's money to help humanity. :shock:
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10622
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby notorial dissent » Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:50 pm

Particularly when the humanity involved is the one spending other people's money on himself.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby TheNewSaint » Sun Sep 17, 2017 1:15 am

Usually the new age drivel at i-uv.com is beneath comment. But fans of unintentional irony will enjoy this piece:

Falsehoods and the Code of Honour (Integrity, Karma and Manifestation)

If you tell a lie, will that lie then come true? Are you subject to the influence of service-to-self/negative entities if you do tell a lie? The Nine respond to these questions by explaining the patterns created by the spoken falsehoods and they also discuss integrity and alignment known as the ‘code of honour’.


Does telling a lie make it true? Well, it hasn't worked for them yet.

Next up is China begins resetting the global currency reserve system", a long and incoherent economic creed filled with insights such as:

A report released by the Nikkei Asian Review indicates that China is prepared to release a RMB Yuan denominated Crude Oil futures contract that is convertible, aka backed by physical Gold.

The contract will enable China’s largest Crude Oil suppliers to settle Crude Oil sales in RMB Yuan, rather than in USDs, and then convert the RMB Yuan into Gold on exchanges in Hong Kong and Shanghai.


The renminbi isn't backed by gold that I know of. Not is it convertible to gold, except in the sense that you can buy gold with it if you want. The bit about a new oil-to-yuan contract is mildly interesting if true, but hardly qualifies as "resetting the global currency reserve system."

The article continues to yammer along these lines, then says:

The “recycling” of petrodollars into US Treasuries has been the life-blood of the US economic and political system.


You heard it from Heather, folks. The United States economy exists only because we "recycle petrodollars into US treasuries", whatever that means.

The article goes on about China minimizing the US dollar's global economic importance, and spins more goldbug fantasies. But here's what I don't get: Why would the "secret treasury accounts" crowd want this? If it's true that people have these accounts, it is in their interest that they retain value. But they cast fantasies about the failure of the US dollar, while at the same time demanding access to their secret account of US dollars.

Judge Roy Bean
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Judge for the District of Quatloosia
Posts: 3528
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 7:04 pm
Location: West of the Pecos
Contact:

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby Judge Roy Bean » Sun Sep 17, 2017 1:28 am

TheNewSaint wrote:... Why would the "secret treasury accounts" crowd want this? If it's true that people have these accounts, it is in their interest that they retain value. But they cast fantasies about the failure of the US dollar, while at the same time demanding access to their secret account of US dollars.


You have to keep in mind that the posters of such gibberish are often simply motivated by feeding the pigeons. The fact that some dumb bird pecked at what was tossed to the ground is enormously satisfying.

They have a tendency to want to watch how many hits their nonsense generates; it feeds their egos without regard to the actual acceptance of the drivel. In their minds, a click on something they posted means they have another sycophant.

This isn't about the real world. Almost all of this is internet fantasy.
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby TheNewSaint » Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:04 pm

Judge Roy Bean wrote:You have to keep in mind that the posters of such gibberish are often simply motivated by feeding the pigeons.


True. Though I think this article also perpetuates their "all money is imaginary" myth, which they use to justify their attempts to access their "secret accounts."

Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2513
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:16 am

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby Jeffrey » Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:23 pm

OPPT comes from the alt-media alt-facts ecosystem. Those type of economic conspiracy theories are their bread and butter.

waylonmercy
Stowaway
Stowaway
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 7:51 pm

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby waylonmercy » Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:25 am

The natives at I-UV.com are getting restless. I saw the following post on the website today.
Nobody, NOBODY, has had successes. Yes the account exists. No you can’t use it.

You cannot provide proof of successful payment. If you can, your probably going to ask for money to show how. And it still won’t work.

The silliest part of this is the account is only supposed to be used to discharge debt… not buy crap on Amazon.

We’ve been fooled into chasing a fake dream.
File your UCC, and watch the magic as it doesn’t matter, it doesn’t work.

A4V didn’t work. And I did this ACH process 6 years ago for a CC, didn’t work, it’s not new, just popular now. Did AHC again a few months ago. Didn’t work. It’s not working. And it’s costing us money.

Please stop, Harvey Dent and Co. Whoever is peddling this shlop. Go back under ground and don’t come up until you are successful. Your fooling thousands of people into a crap shoot that will get them into financial hardship.
“Redemption Manual” $200 piece of incomplete, copy and paste shit. A4V shit. Secure Party Creditor, shit. ACH fresh shit.

“Oh but we all need to do our part, have skin in the game” shit, i already did. And this is my very valuable contribution, write this down in ALL CAPS red ink diagonally and endorse the back:

“THIS IS SHIT”
Lives are going to be in Waylon Mercy's hands.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10622
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby notorial dissent » Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:31 am

And still I don't think whoever the poster is gets it that it is all a con.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Siegfried Shrink
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 518
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: West Midlands, England
Contact:

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby Siegfried Shrink » Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:53 am

Yes the account exists. No you can’t use it.


As evidenced by this quote.

Still an unattainable dream but a dream nonetheless.

User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 6578
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:48 am
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby The Observer » Mon Sep 25, 2017 3:27 pm

notorial dissent wrote:And still I don't think whoever the poster is gets it that it is all a con.


Yes, but he is dancing around it:

Your fooling thousands of people into a crap shoot that will get them into financial hardship.
“Redemption Manual” $200 piece of incomplete, copy and paste shit. A4V shit. Secure Party Creditor, shit. ACH fresh shit.


So he may actually stumble upon the thought that "Hey, what if every one of these "don't-have-to-pay" schemes don't work? OMG, it's a scam!"
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10622
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby notorial dissent » Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:23 pm

Dancing, yes maybe, with fingers in their ears, eyes closed, and humming "it really really isn't a scam, it really really isn't a scam" sort of dancing.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby Burnaby49 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:16 pm

This 134 page monstrosity was filed on Friday;

Alleged
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
alleged Plaintiff
) )
)
Alleged
No. 3:17-CR-82
V.
V ARLAN/SHIRLEY, alleged USDJ/USMJ
RANDALL KEITH BEANE, and
HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF
alleged Defendants
CLERK ACTION: Adjustment of all no.'s
recorded therein, and in 17-531-M,
inclusive of all records therein and thereto.
PRAECIPE TO ENTER DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
AND DECLARATION OF DUE CAUSE,
"PRAECIPE AND DECLARATION OF FACTS"
TO: Debrah C. Poplin,
and
DEBRAH C. POPLIN,
alleged UNITED STATES, specifically and
particularly, CLERK OF COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE, DEBRAH
C.
POPLIN,
and to all alleged Principals thereof, and alleged Agents thereto,
hereafter "CLERK OF
COURT", with reported address Howard H. Baker Jr. H.S. Courthouse, 800 Market Street, Suite 130,
Knoxville, TN 37902, and phone (865) 545-4228.
TO: Thomas A. Varian,
and
THOMAS A. VARLAN,
alleged UNITED STATES, specifically and
particularly
, DISTRICT JUDGE (CHIEF) for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE,
and to all
alleged Principals thereof, and alleged Agents thereto,
hereafter "DISTRICT JUDGE", with
reported address Howard H. Baker Jr. H.S. Courthouse, 800 Market Street, Knoxville, Suite 143, TN
37902
, and phone (865) 545-4762.
TO: C. Clifford Shirley, Jr.,
and
C. CLIFFORD SIDRLEY, JR.,
alleged UNITED STATES
,
specifically and particularly, MAGISTRATE JUDGE (CHIEF) for the EASTERN DISTRICT of
TENNESSEE, C. CLIFFORD SHIRLEY,
and to all alleged Principals thereof, and alleged Agents
thereto
,
hereafter "MAGISTRATE JUDGE"
, with rep01ted address Howard H. Baker Jr. H.S.
Courthouse, 800 Market Street
, Suite 144, Knoxville, TN 37902, and phone (865) 545-4260.
TO: Nancy Stallard Harr,
and
NANCY STALLARD HARR,
with reported address 800 Market
Street, Suite 211, Knoxville, TN 37902, and phone (865) 545-4167, alleged UNITED STATES
,
specifically DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Knox USAO)
, and particularly, alleged UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE,
and to all alleged Principals thereof,
and alleged Agents thereto,
inclusive of:
a.
Cynthia F. Davidson,
and
CYNTHIA F. DAVIDSON,
alleged ASSISTANT UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE; and,
b.
Anne-Marie Svolto,
and
ANNE-MARIE SVOLTO,
alleged ASSISTANT UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE.
TO: Randall Keith Beane,
and
RANDALL KEITH BEANE
,
alleged Defendant.


That's just a cut and paste of page 1. It doesn't get any better;

PRAECIPE #1:
FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW, RESTATED, ALLEGED CLERK OF
COURT SHALL FORTHWITH ENTER THIS PRAECIPE AND DECLARATION OF DUE CAUSE,
INTO THE ALLEGED RECORD OF THE ABOVE TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
PRAECIPE #2:
FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW, RESTATED, ALLEGED
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE,
SHALL FORTHWITH ENTER INTO
THE ALLEGED RECORD, AN ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, OF THE ABOVE
TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
PRAECIPE #3:
PRAECIPE #1-2, RESTATED, AND, FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW,
RESTATED, ALLEGED
UNITED STATES DISTICT COURT JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE
JUDGE,
SHALL FORTHWITH ENTER INTO THE ALLEGED MINUTES OF RECORD, AN
ORDER TO FORTHWITH RELEASE ALL ALLEGED DEFENDANTS OF THE ABOVE TITLED
ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
PRAECIPE #4:
PRAECIPE #1-4, RESTATED, AND FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW,
RESTATED, ALLEGED
CLERK OF COURT
SHALL FORTHWITH ADJUST THE ALLEGED
RECORD ACCORDINGLY OF THE ABOVE TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
NOTICE:
FAILURE TO FORTHWITH DULY COMPLY WITH PRAECIPE #1-4, EACH ACT
DONE AND IN THE ALLEGED RECORD OF THE ALLEGED CLERK OF COURT, SHALL BE
DULY ACCEPTED AS EVIDENCE OF SEPARATE ACTS OF CORRUPTION. FURTHERMORE,
SAID ACTS SHALL BE FORTHWITH DULY ASSESSED, RECONCILED, AND SETTLED
UNDER EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND TRUE BILL ACCOUNTS, BY ORIGINAL,
ACCORDINGLY, WITH FURTHER COPY OF STATEMENT OF SAID ACCOUNTS TO BE
NOTICED INTO THE ABOVE TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED. See Clerk's Records for
3:17-CR-82, and 17-531-MJ.
DECLARATION OF DUE CAUSE,
hereafter
"DECLARATION
OF FACTS":
With full
responsibility, accountability, and liability, under due oath to declare true, accurate, and complete, I
duly declare the following, and that I am conscious and competent to make said declarations, now duly
entered, by PRAECIPE, into the alleged record of the above titled alleged action, restated, and without
prejudice, ab initio (from the beginning), nunc pro tune praeterea preterea:
I. MAXIMS OF LAW:
MAXIM OF LAW #1:
Nothing can be born from a fraud, or deceptive acts and practices, and all such
actions are null and void ab initio.
MAXIM OF LAW #2:
Jurisdiction is the legal authority to hear, do proceedings, and make discretion,
judgment, and order in an action.
MAXIM OF LAW #3:
Lack of jurisdiction can be duly declared at any time prior to final disposition
of an action, except in the instance it appears that a perpetrator used fraud, or deceptive acts and
practices to influence another to believe that they had jurisdiction over them, then MAXIMS
#2-3
and
4-10
are in force, and potentially Maxim #1.
MAXIM OF LAW #4:
When lack of jurisdiction is duly declared, the burden ofprovingjurisdiction
shifts to the one who invokes it is proper, then Maximums #6-10 are in force, and potentially Maximum
#1.
MAXIM OF LAW #5:
Once lack of jurisdiction is duly declared, an alleged court cannot proceed in


Lots and lots of red thumbprints and nunc pro tuncs. Enjoy!

http://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Pacer-Recorded-09-29-17-Praecipe-HATJ.pdf
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs

AndyK
Illuminatian Revenue Supremo Emeritus
Posts: 1299
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:13 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby AndyK » Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:08 pm

They totally blew it.

They admitted jurisdiction since they didn't specify the addresses as (for example):

Howard H. Baker Jr.
H.S. Courthouse
800 Market Street
Suite 130
Knoxville
TN NEAR [37902]
Taxes are the price we pay for a free society and to cover the responsibilities of the evaders

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby Burnaby49 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:12 pm

But don't forget they sent it to the Alleged court instead of the real court. So they haven't admitted jurisdiction to the real court, just the pretend one.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs

Siegfried Shrink
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 518
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: West Midlands, England
Contact:

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Postby Siegfried Shrink » Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:12 pm

In Alberta that would be chucked out for sov-cittery.
Surely in USA that could be chucked out for all those alleged and for disclosing no cause of action or remedy?
Not to mention frivolous abuse of process.
Look at all that 'legal name fraud' stuff


Return to “US”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest