Page 16 of 113

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 7:24 pm
by TheNewSaint
I didn't find anything recent, but I did find this awful story:

http://i-uv.com/freedom-story-another-t ... n-package/
Yesterday, I sat with a dear friend who had become so fearful and despondent over bill collectors and money drama that she tried to suicide.

I had told her about OPPT, but she hadn’t really taken on board how it could change her life. So, I told her to gather the ones that were making her life miserable, and I printed out a bunch of CNs, and together, we filled them out.

I had her read the first one out loud. It was such a joy to watch her move from fear and hopelessness into the realization that those things would never again make her afraid, and from there into Absolute Empowerment.

She was giggling and laughing as the implications of how the CNs cover ALL the bases sunk in.

For me, THAT is Magic!
That's just tragic, and infuriating. Someone at the lowest point of their life for financial reasons, gets pulled into this OPPT nonsense and makes their situation worse. There isn't a circle of hell low enough for people like this.

I wonder what happened to this person later.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 7:38 pm
by notorial dissent
I quite agree, and I shudder to think what happened after the OPPT nonsense crashed and burned for them. I really have no patience for the prosperity crowd. The damage they do is incalcuable.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 7:58 pm
by NYGman
I picture maniacal laughter, and the person totally cracking up, losing all grasp of reality. Que https://youtu.be/hnzHtm1jhL4

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 2:29 am
by waylonmercy
In a new recorded call from jail, Randy Beane told Mike O'Brien that he bought the $500,000 RV to help humanity.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05WANRUJqFw

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:28 am
by notorial dissent
waylonmercy wrote:In a new recorded call from jail, Randy Beane told Mike O'Brien that he bought the $500,000 RV to help humanity.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05WANRUJqFw
Of course he did.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:34 pm
by Judge Roy Bean
waylonmercy wrote:In a new recorded call from jail, Randy Beane told Mike O'Brien that he bought the $500,000 RV to help humanity. ...
Nothing like spending a half-mil of someone else's money to help humanity. :shock:

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:50 pm
by notorial dissent
Particularly when the humanity involved is the one spending other people's money on himself.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:15 am
by TheNewSaint
Usually the new age drivel at i-uv.com is beneath comment. But fans of unintentional irony will enjoy this piece:
Falsehoods and the Code of Honour (Integrity, Karma and Manifestation)

If you tell a lie, will that lie then come true? Are you subject to the influence of service-to-self/negative entities if you do tell a lie? The Nine respond to these questions by explaining the patterns created by the spoken falsehoods and they also discuss integrity and alignment known as the ‘code of honour’.
Does telling a lie make it true? Well, it hasn't worked for them yet.

Next up is China begins resetting the global currency reserve system", a long and incoherent economic creed filled with insights such as:
A report released by the Nikkei Asian Review indicates that China is prepared to release a RMB Yuan denominated Crude Oil futures contract that is convertible, aka backed by physical Gold.

The contract will enable China’s largest Crude Oil suppliers to settle Crude Oil sales in RMB Yuan, rather than in USDs, and then convert the RMB Yuan into Gold on exchanges in Hong Kong and Shanghai.
The renminbi isn't backed by gold that I know of. Not is it convertible to gold, except in the sense that you can buy gold with it if you want. The bit about a new oil-to-yuan contract is mildly interesting if true, but hardly qualifies as "resetting the global currency reserve system."

The article continues to yammer along these lines, then says:
The “recycling” of petrodollars into US Treasuries has been the life-blood of the US economic and political system.
You heard it from Heather, folks. The United States economy exists only because we "recycle petrodollars into US treasuries", whatever that means.

The article goes on about China minimizing the US dollar's global economic importance, and spins more goldbug fantasies. But here's what I don't get: Why would the "secret treasury accounts" crowd want this? If it's true that people have these accounts, it is in their interest that they retain value. But they cast fantasies about the failure of the US dollar, while at the same time demanding access to their secret account of US dollars.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 12:28 am
by Judge Roy Bean
TheNewSaint wrote:... Why would the "secret treasury accounts" crowd want this? If it's true that people have these accounts, it is in their interest that they retain value. But they cast fantasies about the failure of the US dollar, while at the same time demanding access to their secret account of US dollars.
You have to keep in mind that the posters of such gibberish are often simply motivated by feeding the pigeons. The fact that some dumb bird pecked at what was tossed to the ground is enormously satisfying.

They have a tendency to want to watch how many hits their nonsense generates; it feeds their egos without regard to the actual acceptance of the drivel. In their minds, a click on something they posted means they have another sycophant.

This isn't about the real world. Almost all of this is internet fantasy.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:04 pm
by TheNewSaint
Judge Roy Bean wrote:You have to keep in mind that the posters of such gibberish are often simply motivated by feeding the pigeons.
True. Though I think this article also perpetuates their "all money is imaginary" myth, which they use to justify their attempts to access their "secret accounts."

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:23 pm
by Jeffrey
OPPT comes from the alt-media alt-facts ecosystem. Those type of economic conspiracy theories are their bread and butter.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 7:25 am
by waylonmercy
The natives at I-UV.com are getting restless. I saw the following post on the website today.
Nobody, NOBODY, has had successes. Yes the account exists. No you can’t use it.

You cannot provide proof of successful payment. If you can, your probably going to ask for money to show how. And it still won’t work.

The silliest part of this is the account is only supposed to be used to discharge debt… not buy crap on Amazon.

We’ve been fooled into chasing a fake dream.
File your UCC, and watch the magic as it doesn’t matter, it doesn’t work.

A4V didn’t work. And I did this ACH process 6 years ago for a CC, didn’t work, it’s not new, just popular now. Did AHC again a few months ago. Didn’t work. It’s not working. And it’s costing us money.

Please stop, Harvey Dent and Co. Whoever is peddling this shlop. Go back under ground and don’t come up until you are successful. Your fooling thousands of people into a crap shoot that will get them into financial hardship.
“Redemption Manual” $200 piece of incomplete, copy and paste shit. A4V shit. Secure Party Creditor, shit. ACH fresh shit.

“Oh but we all need to do our part, have skin in the game” shit, i already did. And this is my very valuable contribution, write this down in ALL CAPS red ink diagonally and endorse the back:

“THIS IS SHIT”

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:31 am
by notorial dissent
And still I don't think whoever the poster is gets it that it is all a con.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:53 am
by Siegfried Shrink
Yes the account exists. No you can’t use it.
As evidenced by this quote.

Still an unattainable dream but a dream nonetheless.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:27 pm
by The Observer
notorial dissent wrote:And still I don't think whoever the poster is gets it that it is all a con.
Yes, but he is dancing around it:
Your fooling thousands of people into a crap shoot that will get them into financial hardship.
“Redemption Manual” $200 piece of incomplete, copy and paste shit. A4V shit. Secure Party Creditor, shit. ACH fresh shit.
So he may actually stumble upon the thought that "Hey, what if every one of these "don't-have-to-pay" schemes don't work? OMG, it's a scam!"

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:23 pm
by notorial dissent
Dancing, yes maybe, with fingers in their ears, eyes closed, and humming "it really really isn't a scam, it really really isn't a scam" sort of dancing.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:16 pm
by Burnaby49
This 134 page monstrosity was filed on Friday;
Alleged
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT KNOXVILLE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
alleged Plaintiff
) )
)
Alleged
No. 3:17-CR-82
V.
V ARLAN/SHIRLEY, alleged USDJ/USMJ
RANDALL KEITH BEANE, and
HEATHER ANN TUCCI-JARRAF
alleged Defendants
CLERK ACTION: Adjustment of all no.'s
recorded therein, and in 17-531-M,
inclusive of all records therein and thereto.
PRAECIPE TO ENTER DIMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
AND DECLARATION OF DUE CAUSE,
"PRAECIPE AND DECLARATION OF FACTS"
TO: Debrah C. Poplin,
and
DEBRAH C. POPLIN,
alleged UNITED STATES, specifically and
particularly, CLERK OF COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE, DEBRAH
C.
POPLIN,
and to all alleged Principals thereof, and alleged Agents thereto,
hereafter "CLERK OF
COURT", with reported address Howard H. Baker Jr. H.S. Courthouse, 800 Market Street, Suite 130,
Knoxville, TN 37902, and phone (865) 545-4228.
TO: Thomas A. Varian,
and
THOMAS A. VARLAN,
alleged UNITED STATES, specifically and
particularly
, DISTRICT JUDGE (CHIEF) for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE,
and to all
alleged Principals thereof, and alleged Agents thereto,
hereafter "DISTRICT JUDGE", with
reported address Howard H. Baker Jr. H.S. Courthouse, 800 Market Street, Knoxville, Suite 143, TN
37902
, and phone (865) 545-4762.
TO: C. Clifford Shirley, Jr.,
and
C. CLIFFORD SIDRLEY, JR.,
alleged UNITED STATES
,
specifically and particularly, MAGISTRATE JUDGE (CHIEF) for the EASTERN DISTRICT of
TENNESSEE, C. CLIFFORD SHIRLEY,
and to all alleged Principals thereof, and alleged Agents
thereto
,
hereafter "MAGISTRATE JUDGE"
, with rep01ted address Howard H. Baker Jr. H.S.
Courthouse, 800 Market Street
, Suite 144, Knoxville, TN 37902, and phone (865) 545-4260.
TO: Nancy Stallard Harr,
and
NANCY STALLARD HARR,
with reported address 800 Market
Street, Suite 211, Knoxville, TN 37902, and phone (865) 545-4167, alleged UNITED STATES
,
specifically DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Knox USAO)
, and particularly, alleged UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE,
and to all alleged Principals thereof,
and alleged Agents thereto,
inclusive of:
a.
Cynthia F. Davidson,
and
CYNTHIA F. DAVIDSON,
alleged ASSISTANT UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE; and,
b.
Anne-Marie Svolto,
and
ANNE-MARIE SVOLTO,
alleged ASSISTANT UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY for the EASTERN DISTRICT of TENNESSEE.
TO: Randall Keith Beane,
and
RANDALL KEITH BEANE
,
alleged Defendant.
That's just a cut and paste of page 1. It doesn't get any better;
PRAECIPE #1:
FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW, RESTATED, ALLEGED CLERK OF
COURT SHALL FORTHWITH ENTER THIS PRAECIPE AND DECLARATION OF DUE CAUSE,
INTO THE ALLEGED RECORD OF THE ABOVE TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
PRAECIPE #2:
FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW, RESTATED, ALLEGED
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE,
SHALL FORTHWITH ENTER INTO
THE ALLEGED RECORD, AN ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, OF THE ABOVE
TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
PRAECIPE #3:
PRAECIPE #1-2, RESTATED, AND, FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW,
RESTATED, ALLEGED
UNITED STATES DISTICT COURT JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE
JUDGE,
SHALL FORTHWITH ENTER INTO THE ALLEGED MINUTES OF RECORD, AN
ORDER TO FORTHWITH RELEASE ALL ALLEGED DEFENDANTS OF THE ABOVE TITLED
ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
PRAECIPE #4:
PRAECIPE #1-4, RESTATED, AND FOR DUE CAUSE, DECLARED BELOW,
RESTATED, ALLEGED
CLERK OF COURT
SHALL FORTHWITH ADJUST THE ALLEGED
RECORD ACCORDINGLY OF THE ABOVE TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED.
NOTICE:
FAILURE TO FORTHWITH DULY COMPLY WITH PRAECIPE #1-4, EACH ACT
DONE AND IN THE ALLEGED RECORD OF THE ALLEGED CLERK OF COURT, SHALL BE
DULY ACCEPTED AS EVIDENCE OF SEPARATE ACTS OF CORRUPTION. FURTHERMORE,
SAID ACTS SHALL BE FORTHWITH DULY ASSESSED, RECONCILED, AND SETTLED
UNDER EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND TRUE BILL ACCOUNTS, BY ORIGINAL,
ACCORDINGLY, WITH FURTHER COPY OF STATEMENT OF SAID ACCOUNTS TO BE
NOTICED INTO THE ABOVE TITLED ALLEGED ACTION, RESTATED. See Clerk's Records for
3:17-CR-82, and 17-531-MJ.
DECLARATION OF DUE CAUSE,
hereafter
"DECLARATION
OF FACTS":
With full
responsibility, accountability, and liability, under due oath to declare true, accurate, and complete, I
duly declare the following, and that I am conscious and competent to make said declarations, now duly
entered, by PRAECIPE, into the alleged record of the above titled alleged action, restated, and without
prejudice, ab initio (from the beginning), nunc pro tune praeterea preterea:
I. MAXIMS OF LAW:
MAXIM OF LAW #1:
Nothing can be born from a fraud, or deceptive acts and practices, and all such
actions are null and void ab initio.
MAXIM OF LAW #2:
Jurisdiction is the legal authority to hear, do proceedings, and make discretion,
judgment, and order in an action.
MAXIM OF LAW #3:
Lack of jurisdiction can be duly declared at any time prior to final disposition
of an action, except in the instance it appears that a perpetrator used fraud, or deceptive acts and
practices to influence another to believe that they had jurisdiction over them, then MAXIMS
#2-3
and
4-10
are in force, and potentially Maxim #1.
MAXIM OF LAW #4:
When lack of jurisdiction is duly declared, the burden ofprovingjurisdiction
shifts to the one who invokes it is proper, then Maximums #6-10 are in force, and potentially Maximum
#1.
MAXIM OF LAW #5:
Once lack of jurisdiction is duly declared, an alleged court cannot proceed in
Lots and lots of red thumbprints and nunc pro tuncs. Enjoy!

http://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2017 ... e-HATJ.pdf

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:08 pm
by AndyK
They totally blew it.

They admitted jurisdiction since they didn't specify the addresses as (for example):

Howard H. Baker Jr.
H.S. Courthouse
800 Market Street
Suite 130
Knoxville
TN NEAR [37902]

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:12 pm
by Burnaby49
But don't forget they sent it to the Alleged court instead of the real court. So they haven't admitted jurisdiction to the real court, just the pretend one.

Re: OPPT (One Person's Public Trial) - Tucci-Jarraf

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:12 pm
by Siegfried Shrink
In Alberta that would be chucked out for sov-cittery.
Surely in USA that could be chucked out for all those alleged and for disclosing no cause of action or remedy?
Not to mention frivolous abuse of process.
Look at all that 'legal name fraud' stuff