Page 1 of 10
Class, Rodney Dale
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 4:36 am
by notorial dissent
Does anyone know what actually happened in this case? Adask is busy having a froth fest, but so far I haven't been able to actually find anything but attributions that make no sense, and since Adask is saying one thing I am betting the actual results were entirely the opposite.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:13 am
by JamesVincent
What?!?!?!?! Are you suggesting that Adask might be <gasp> lying?!?!?!?
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:24 am
by notorial dissent
I'm just suggesting his reality check bounced a very long time ago.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:05 pm
by wserra
Class is another
groyse chochem "private attorney general". He appears to have mastered spell checkers, but obviously was playing hooky during third-grade grammar lessons.
The "suit" (insofar as it is comprehensible at all) is the usual hodgepodge of out-of-context quotes and simple gibberish. How
Class describes it:
The issue before this Court is that the Defendants violate the Rights of this Petitioner by violating Federal Statutes and States general statutes on the Right to travel freely. The Petitioner was force to appear in Gaston County Court operating under Maritime Law in an administrative court before a so called administrative law judge to face charges under State Statutes by a person claiming to represent the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA when the defendant held no public office to make such a allegation using N.C.G.S as a base for the stop.
There. Now you know.
A month or so ago, a N.C. judge
threw the whole sorry mess into the trash. The appropriate headline: "Class Dismissed".
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 1:15 pm
by notorial dissent
OK, Adask et al are claiming that some how the judge declared the police and gov't officers there private citizens and that they are no longer considered "local Police Departments in North Carolina are classified as “private entities” and NOT connected to the state of North Carolina" or some such nonsense.
I think a more likely scenario is that we have yet another of the can't tell a dismissal from a confirmation crowd.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 4:33 pm
by wserra
I suspect it had something to do with suing public employees individually as opposed to suing their employer. Or with who is a proper party, along the lines of the case that leads the same dim bulbs to say that the IRS is not an agency of the federal government.
One thing I'm not going to do is try to figure it out. Wacko's case was dismissed, with prejudice. Nothing else matters.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 4:45 pm
by notorial dissent
Apparently reading comprehension is not a strong point with that crowd.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 1:42 pm
by wserra
Class was arrested last week in DC. Charges: possession of a handgun, a felony. 2013 CF2 009225 (DC Superior Court). According to the docket, he has been released on bail, and is awaiting grand jury action.
I don't see how they can possibly hold him, let alone convict him. Why, he'll just file one of his "
Original Corum (sic) Non Judice" um, well,
thingies and they'll have to let him go and apologize.
Won't they?
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:23 pm
by Famspear
If he's going to give them one of his thingies, then he should provide them with a Coca-Cola as well.
Know what I mean?
No?
Come on, everyone knows that.....
........
thingies go better with Coke!
Note: Readers under the age of about 50 years should consult an older person for guidance on interpreting this post.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 3:30 pm
by JamesVincent
Famspear wrote:
Note: Readers under the age of about 50 years should consult an older person for guidance on interpreting this post.
I'm under the age of 50 and I got it, thank you.
Back to Class (yes that was intentional) does it say whether he was carrying concealed or if he was just in possession of it (had it in his car or something)? World of difference in what he finally ends up with.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 5:45 pm
by wserra
Docket says "not in home or office". That's it.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 8:32 pm
by grixit
He's got his thingy in a wringer now.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 11:34 pm
by webhick
grixit wrote:He's got his thingy in a wringy now.
Fixed it for you.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:03 am
by notorial dissent
I think Mr Class is slowly graduating to the big time, going from penny ante moving violations cases to outright felony.
I don't know that I had seen his version of gobbledygook, but it definitely qualifies. I'm sure it will work just as well against his now Federal case as it did in his various state cases.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:38 am
by Chados
Class is like college in July: No class.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:36 am
by notorial dissent
This may belong in a separate category, but here goes.
Seems Rod has finally graduated to the big time, no more penny ante parking tickets and county warrants for him, he just got popped for what are probably going to be multiple felonies by the time he is done doing his thing and bringing down the system.
Seems he parked illegally on the capitol grounds, with fire arms in the car. He got picked up by the Capitol Police, charged by DC, had those charges dropped in favor of the Federal ones that were brought forward. Of course he is claiming it is all a victory for him since he didn't grant jurisdiction or something, but he doesn't seem to get it that the DC charges were dropped in favor of the far stiffer Federal charges. At this point, he is under detention awaiting the various hearings to come, totally confused by the whole process.
I do not see this ending well for him.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:54 pm
by The Observer
notorial dissent wrote: Of course he is claiming it is all a victory for him since he didn't grant jurisdiction or something, but he doesn't seem to get it that the DC charges were dropped in favor of the far stiffer Federal charges.
But you have to admit that this meets the idjit victory conditions; after all, DC cops backed down and he is not on trial under DC jurisdiction. So what if he is facing a stiffer sentence under federal jurisdiction? We here at Quatloos should not be so stingy and mean regarding those TPs, sovruns and paytriots who worked very hard to hurt themselves more than necessary - we should salute them for their idiocy.
So to Rod Class, whereever you are in the federal prison system, a big congrats to "defeating" the local DC jurisdiction!
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 3:05 pm
by Lambkin
notorial dissent wrote:Seems he parked illegally on the capitol grounds, with fire arms in the car. He got picked up by the Capitol Police, charged by DC, had those charges dropped in favor of the Federal ones that were brought forward.
When did this happen? Source?
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 3:08 pm
by Lambkin
I guess it was this May 31, 2013 arrest.
http://dccrimestories.com/write-in-cand ... s-capitol/
According to charging documents, on the afternoon of May 31, a plain clothes officer noticed a black Jeep parked illegally in front of the U.S. Botanical Gardens in the 200 block of Maryland Avenue SW. The vehicle was unoccupied.
Inside the Jeep, the officer spotted numerous weapons: a sword in the overhead roll bar; a knife in the right of the driver’s seat, several holsters in the driver’s side door and two batons in the back of the vehicle.
Re: Rod Class v. North Carolina
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 3:13 pm
by Lambkin