In Jail By Consent?

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean

How does man gain authority over man?

Majority rule
0
No votes
Legislation
0
No votes
Consent of the parties
0
No votes
Customs of immemorial antiquity
0
No votes
Force
0
No votes
Force of Law
1
2%
TROLL ALE TROLL ALE TROLL ALE NOM NOM NOM
30
49%
MORE TROLL ALE ::HIC::
30
49%
 
Total votes: 61

User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6108
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

I don't consent to anything except ngupowered 1) giving us citations supporting the premise that consent of defendants is necessary for criminal jurisdiction to attach to them; 2) admitting that he has nothing of the sort; and 3) going away and not bothering us again if he does neither of the first two.

He really belongs on Saving to Suitors or Sui Juris --they'll believe any screwball legal hypothesis, especially if larded with religious references.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
Lambkin
Warder of the Quatloosian Gibbet
Posts: 1206
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:43 pm

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Lambkin »

I'm going to have to go ahead and withdraw my consent for anything ngupowered wants, now or at any time in the future, while reserving my right to withdraw my withdrawal of consent at a later date. If I accidentally consented to anything, I now formally unconsent to everything.
obadiah
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:47 pm
Location: The Gorge, Oregon

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by obadiah »

Lambkin wrote:I'm going to have to go ahead and withdraw my consent for anything ngupowered wants, now or at any time in the future, while reserving my right to withdraw my withdrawal of consent at a later date. If I accidentally consented to anything, I now formally unconsent to everything.
I don't consent to that.

:beatinghorse:
1. There is a kind of law that I like, which are my own rules, which I call common law. It applies to me.
2. There are many other kinds of law but they don’t apply to me, because I say so."
LLAP
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Famspear »

The Ode Of He Who Holds the Delusional Belief That Consent Is Required

'Though a prison term's scheduled for me,
I must say that I cannot agree!
If consent I withhold,
Do you think I'll be told
That the marshal will just set me free?

'Though I might have once said "I consent,"
I am sure, now, it's not what I meant!
I will bellow and wail
If they take me to jail,
And my clothes I will rip up and rent.

Oh, I suffer delusion, no doubt;
If they throw me in prison, I'll pout!
I will pull out my hair,
'Cause it just ain't no fair:
All that wailin' will not get me out!

Others know that I live in a dream
Where "consent" is my recurring theme.
So, I act like a troll
And more nonsense extol;
I just hope I don't run out of steam.

Oh, I argue: "consent is required!"--
But my argument really is tired.
'Though I just keep on tryin',
Nobody is buyin'
This nonsense in which I am mired.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by The Observer »

I don't remember consenting to that either, Famspear.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Famspear »

The Observer wrote:I don't remember consenting to that either, Famspear.
:)

'Though we may not remember consent,
"Out of shape" we should not become bent!
This ain't much of a poem--
Who knows where this is goin'?
I should give up this nonsense for Lent!
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
obadiah
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:47 pm
Location: The Gorge, Oregon

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by obadiah »

Famspear wrote:
The Observer wrote:I don't remember consenting to that either, Famspear.
:)

'Though we may not remember consent,
"Out of shape" we should not become bent!
This ain't much of a poem--
Who knows where this is goin'?
I should give up this nonsense for Lent!
Some of your better efforts, actually. :lol:
1. There is a kind of law that I like, which are my own rules, which I call common law. It applies to me.
2. There are many other kinds of law but they don’t apply to me, because I say so."
LLAP
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by notorial dissent »

Yes, but you should've known that the situation would eventually provoke / encourage him to this, and you know it never takes much, it was inevitable. This is just one more disruption of harmony we owe Gnuggy for.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by LPC »

The Observer wrote:I don't remember consenting to that either, Famspear.
I don't remember consenting to Famspear at all.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
JennyD
Captain
Captain
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:32 pm
Location: Somewhere South of Canada...

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by JennyD »

Can I consent to more Troll Ale? I think I need another drinkiepoo.....


:haha:
Famspear
Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
Posts: 7668
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Famspear »

JennyD wrote:Can I consent to more Troll Ale? I think I need another drinkiepoo.....
So, thou would'st drink more of the ale?
Could'st thou drink a whole pitcher -- or pail?
If we drink all that stuff,
It might get kinda rough!
I just hope that the ale don't go stale!

I presume you're the age of Consent!
Not too young -- can you handle this hint?
Who would ever a-thunk
We could get roarin' drunk?
Our emotions we're able to vent!
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
ngupowered
Scalawag
Scalawag
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 9:26 am

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by ngupowered »

Jenny, isn't the ale in the kitchen and webchick can bring one out for ya?

So, it's 3 weeks now. All you come up with are 2 opinions where some guys motion the courts to hear their arguments.
Maybe Olcese and the Justice Court can help you spruce up.

So when are you moderators going to moderate the off-topic postings?
If this was my last post, you'd know I was inappropriately banned
You know I'm right you're wrong I'm wrong you know I'm right ...
I consent to ban other users and moderate their posts.
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Civics for ngupowered

Post by grixit »

Ok, i'm going to get serious for a moment. After this i'll not only ignore ng, i'll ignore all discussions involving them.


So here goes:

AUTHORITY COMES FROM CONSENSUS

The Declaration refers to "consent of the governed", but it's not the kind of consent you've been nattering about. The phrase "the governed" refers to the population as a whole, and "consent" refers to the lack of serious opposition by the population. Which is another way of referring to consensus. It's not your "I, as an individual, give you my consent, so you're allowed to govern me". It's "we, as a whole, either approve of this arrangement, or at least acquiesce". There's your "silence gives consent", btw, "acquiesce" means "be quiet".

So in short: Consensus = Approval + Acquiescence. One of the entries in your questionnaire is "majority rule". Historically consensus has rarely been a matter of absolute numbers. It's been a matter of weighted numbers. You also refer to force and threats, that's one way of weighting. "We don't like the king, but we don't like even more having knights burn our homes and stab us; guess we'll put up with him." You mention tradition, that gives rise to social and cultural pressures. Which are another form of weight. "Listen, children, Jesus gives us our kings and bitching about any of them makes Jesus sad." Then there's human nature. "Revolution? Sounds great, but, um, i don't think i can afford to leave my farm just now." And skepticism. "Ok, i can see dying for freedom, i just don't see that this revolution is really about that."

As civilization has progressed we have moved in the direction of consensus reflecting the opinions of a true majority, albeit there's plenty of room for improvement. We've also developed the concept of rights, which are sort of derived from a long term consensus to restrain the effects of a transitory one.

And once a consensus is established, it is binding on every member of the community, including you. And our current consensus has left no room for anyone to willy nilly opt out. What it does allow for, is for itself to be changed through persuasion. Not by sending notices of personal secession, nor by arguing semantics with judges. You have to campaign. You have to offer argument. You have to offer reason to think that change will be worthwhile. Not just the hearty approval of your fellow believers, but the visible acquiescence of a whole lot of people who currently find the status quo to be at least the lesser evil.

Ave et vale.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
Lambkin
Warder of the Quatloosian Gibbet
Posts: 1206
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:43 pm

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Lambkin »

ngupowered wrote:Jenny, isn't the ale in the kitchen and webchick can bring one out for ya?

So, it's 3 weeks now. All you come up with are 2 opinions where some guys motion the courts to hear their arguments.
Maybe Olcese and the Justice Court can help you spruce up.

So when are you moderators going to moderate the off-topic postings?
I'll consent to mods pushing the misogynist troll out the airlock. "Space him."
JennyD
Captain
Captain
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 10:32 pm
Location: Somewhere South of Canada...

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by JennyD »

Lambkin wrote:
ngupowered wrote:Jenny, isn't the ale in the kitchen and webchick can bring one out for ya?

So, it's 3 weeks now. All you come up with are 2 opinions where some guys motion the courts to hear their arguments.
Maybe Olcese and the Justice Court can help you spruce up.

So when are you moderators going to moderate the off-topic postings?
I'll consent to mods pushing the misogynist troll out the airlock. "Space him."
Seconded.....
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6108
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

JennyD wrote:
Lambkin wrote:
ngupowered wrote:Jenny, isn't the ale in the kitchen and webchick can bring one out for ya?

So, it's 3 weeks now. All you come up with are 2 opinions where some guys motion the courts to hear their arguments.
Maybe Olcese and the Justice Court can help you spruce up.

If you are so ignorant of the law to think that, because the decision of an appellate court is an "opinion", that it's just the justices' guess as to what the law is, rather than a definitive statement of what the law is, you're hopeless.

So when are you moderators going to moderate the off-topic postings?
I'll consent to mods pushing the misogynist troll out the airlock. "Space him."
Seconded.....
Moved.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by The Observer »

ngupowered wrote:So when are you moderators going to moderate the off-topic postings?
Why would we do that? After all, you consented to this.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
Kestrel
Endangerer of Stupid Species
Posts: 877
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:09 pm
Location: Hovering overhead, scanning for prey

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by Kestrel »

Pottapaug1938 wrote:
JennyD wrote:
Lambkin wrote:I'll consent to mods pushing the misogynist troll out the airlock. "Space him."
Seconded.....
Moved.
Would you prefer to spin the lock or swing the hatch open?

I wouldn't worry about him getting hurt. There's already such a big void between his ears that exposure to deep space won't make much difference.
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig." - Robert Heinlein
User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3994
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by webhick »

ngupowered wrote:Jenny, isn't the ale in the kitchen and webchick can bring one out for ya?

So, it's 3 weeks now. All you come up with are 2 opinions where some guys motion the courts to hear their arguments.
Maybe Olcese and the Justice Court can help you spruce up.

So when are you moderators going to moderate the off-topic postings?
My name is not webchick. It is webhick. And webhick has been away from the computer all day.

You were warned about sexist insults and it's quite clear by your sexist comments that you're looking to get banned.

Well, we don't consent to you turning Quatloos into a hostile environment towards women. Goodbye, troll.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
Location: Wherever my truck goes.

Re: In Jail By Consent?

Post by JamesVincent »

Image
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire

Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"