Page 1 of 1
MLM ranking
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:40 am
by JamesVincent
MLM Rankings has released their new rankings for the last 6 months. Enjoy.
http://www.mlmrankings.com/top_mlm_performers.asp
# 1 Xplocial
1,531% Gain
# 2 LegalShield
1,138% Gain
# 3 bHIP
769% Gain
# 4 Rippln
679% Gain
# 5 Text Cash Network
438% Gain
# 6 wakeupnow
420% Gain
# 7 Heritage Makers
292% Gain
# 8 SoZo
217% Gain
# 9 Stream Cosmetics
165% Gain
# 10 Varolo
154% Gain
note: If you look at the full chart they go down to 104. At 103, Lemongrass Spa Products, gained 0%.
Re: MLM ranking
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:58 pm
by Kestrel
At first glance I thought this was a ranking list of recruits or sales. It's something else entirely. This is a ratings list of showing the increase/decrease in google-type searches for the MLM companies.
I'll be Herbalife's ranking went through the roof when Bill Ackman announced his short-sale last December.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this site?
To offer a representative list of MLMs and compare them based on public interest.
How is public interest determined?
By search queries done on the major search engines every thirty day period.
Why do I see closed companies included in the list?
Even closed companies will still generate residual searches by people looking for historical info on the company.
Why post this information?
We think this information is of general interest to people involved with MLM and home based businesses. Companies often post their own press releases and say things like 'Number One MLM in the Country' or claiming they have the most public 'buzz' about their products or service. Public interest through search engine queries is very difficult to manipulate.
If a company ranks very high, or very low, does that mean they are good or bad?
Public interest does not in any way represent the *quality* of the company, just the general buzz and penetration into the market by name recognition and general interest.
Re: MLM ranking
Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:45 pm
by notorial dissent
I was going to ask if these figures were supposed to impress me, which of course they were supposed to, I just see now why I am even less impressed than I would have been before, -1,000% or so in fact. No wonder I always got the quivering weebies when ever I had to be around an MLM'er.