I don't recall the messages you deleted (yes, the deleted message placeholder shows who deleted the message, but not what it was), but we are not allowed to comment on what the law should be -- we comment on what the law is. (Exceptions include legal attempts to change the law, such as actual court cases or submitted legislation, and the NESARA forum.) Some of your comments earlier in this thread (living outside the box) suggest that your comments were, well, outside the law, and hence not appropriate on this board.Wake Up! Productions wrote:Burnaby49 wrote:A point that ninja made that I'd like to repeat. While Steve seems to have gone off the deep end over some disagreements with him nobody was hostile or unfriendly or even impolite. Just standard questioning of proof of his contentions.
Steve seemed to get into a fuss over a posting I made where he and I actually agreed. We were getting off topic in the Dean Clifford thread so I said I'd start a new discussion and move the off-topic Dean postings to it. Then we could all squabble as much as we wanted in the new discussion.
What is good for the goose is NOT good for the gander on Quatloos !!!
I have been reading this site for about 6 months, and I was constantly seeing posts about "STAYING ON TOPIC". A month ago I decided to become a member, and today I realised that "Quatloosians" don't even abide by their own rules !!!
I responded to a valid comment with my views on Canada's tax system on DEAN CLIFFORD'S FORUM, ...
Should we have deleted the messages rather than commenting on their impropriety and/or hilarity? Possibly.