How to get my

JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
Location: Wherever my truck goes.

Re: How to get my

Post by JamesVincent »

Patriotdiscussions wrote: While Nordic.Davis.might have been a racist from what I understand he was a patriot most of us could only hope to be. If the stories are true he was well liked and enjoyed many friends in law enforcement and supposedly help to end the Vietnam war( operation rolling thunder).
Sorry but I can't let that one pass. Davis never served in the military that I ever saw. Running a militia does not count as military service. Operation Rolling Thunder was a military campaign through and through. Also if you actually look at the time periods Davis claims to be involved:
In 1972, we originated Operation Rolling Thunder, a private civilian operation designed to militarily close Haiphong Harbor in North Vietnam to prevent the enemy from getting its supplies. As a result of that operation, and the ten day ultimatum Northpoint Teams gave to CINCPAC on April 28, 1972, President Nixon was forced to put a blockage around that harbor on May 8, 1972, to protect the supply lines to the Rockefeller EXXON refinery located there. As a direct result, and our Team Project goal, the Vietnam War had to be cycled down and stopped. Daniel 11:32 and Psalm 144:1 [KJV] I made some awesome enemies, and some grateful friends, in Washington, DC, for that Tactical Project.
Funny, I never heard of that but I have heard of the true Operation Rolling Thunder, an air campaign against North Vietnam that lasted from '65-'68. The operation was halted in '68 by order of the President to get the NVs to the table in Paris and was never restarted. I can tell you one thing for certain, the military does not recycle operation names, meaning there will never be an Operation Rolling Thunder again in the military.

The mining of Haiphong harbor was carried out under Operation Linebacker I&II. It was not to protect anything, the entire harbor was sealed and nothing got in or out. Sorry, even though start date of Linebacker was 8 May 1972 it's original conception and order by Nixon was on 4 April 1972, a full 24 days before Davis claimed to have started his push. Nixon took a lot of flack with the advent of Linebacker since his foreign policy advisers were more worried about the effect on the SALT talks.
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire

Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
Location: Wherever my truck goes.

Re: How to get my

Post by JamesVincent »

Patriotdiscussions wrote:Yeah, except that is not the case with ponsford. If you go to usa the republic website under the iris link, it has his letter to the iris as well as a per from the iris releasing a 30 year lien for over 1 million dollars.

Now why would they not try to take his stuff or throw him in jail?

Do you have to owe more then a million bucks or something?
Link and cite?
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire

Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

JamesVincent wrote:
Patriotdiscussions wrote: While Nordic.Davis.might have been a racist from what I understand he was a patriot most of us could only hope to be. If the stories are true he was well liked and enjoyed many friends in law enforcement and supposedly help to end the Vietnam war( operation rolling thunder).
Sorry but I can't let that one pass. Davis never served in the military that I ever saw. Running a militia does not count as military service. Operation Rolling Thunder was a military campaign through and through. Also if you actually look at the time periods Davis claims to be involved:
In 1972, we originated Operation Rolling Thunder, a private civilian operation designed to militarily close Haiphong Harbor in North Vietnam to prevent the enemy from getting its supplies. As a result of that operation, and the ten day ultimatum Northpoint Teams gave to CINCPAC on April 28, 1972, President Nixon was forced to put a blockage around that harbor on May 8, 1972, to protect the supply lines to the Rockefeller EXXON refinery located there. As a direct result, and our Team Project goal, the Vietnam War had to be cycled down and stopped. Daniel 11:32 and Psalm 144:1 [KJV] I made some awesome enemies, and some grateful friends, in Washington, DC, for that Tactical Project.
Funny, I never heard of that but I have heard of the true Operation Rolling Thunder, an air campaign against North Vietnam that lasted from '65-'68. The operation was halted in '68 by order of the President to get the NVs to the table in Paris and was never restarted. I can tell you one thing for certain, the military does not recycle operation names, meaning there will never be an Operation Rolling Thunder again in the military.

The mining of Haiphong harbor was carried out under Operation Linebacker I&II. It was not to protect anything, the entire harbor was sealed and nothing got in or out. Sorry, even though start date of Linebacker was 8 May 1972 it's original conception and order by Nixon was on 4 April 1972, a full 24 days before Davis claimed to have started his push. Nixon took a lot of flack with the advent of Linebacker since his foreign policy advisers were more worried about the effect on the SALT talks.

Perhaps a little more reading? Also the north point teams were civvies and not armed forces so they could name it whatever they wanted, there is supposed to be a book about it. He makes some pretty big claims that are easy enough to check out.



So, who is Nord Davis, Jr?

In May, 1966, I discovered that I had been one of The Called from the foundation of the world to be conformed to the image of His Son, Jesus Christ, the Lord of Hosts. I was given the Gift of Teaching. Healing, Helps and Governments. Romans 8:28, John 16:7-14, and I Corinthians 12:28.

Dallas Conspiracy, my first extensive pamphlet that exposes exactly how the famous murder in Dallas was carried out, was first written soon after I resigned from the IBM Company to expose their sales of sophisticated computer equipment to the Communists in time of war. My resignation made the New York Times in June, 1966. The entire Soviet space effort, as well as their offensive missile computer capabilities, were then being supplied to them by IBM and other American computer firms.

While I am qualified to write in the field of classic economics, I prefer to be a student of conspiratorial political science and work toward the exposure of its tactics. In 1970, I was nominated to be the American Independent Party"s Candidate for the United States Senate from Massachusetts, opposing Ted Kennedy"s Fabian socialism. Predictably, I hardly made a dent in Massachusetts liberal electorate. On the positive side, I have won the Liberty Award for patriotic journalism from The Congress of Freedom on five occasions. Isaiah 58:1

In 1972, we originated Operation Rolling Thunder, a private civilian operation designed to militarily close Haiphong Harbor in North Vietnam to prevent the enemy from getting its supplies. As a result of that- operation, and the ten day ultimatum Northpoint Teams gave to CINCPAC on April 28, 1972, President Nixon was forced to put a blockage around that harbor on May 8, 1972, to protect the supply lines to the Rockefeller EXXON refinery located there. As a direct result, and our Team Project goal, the Vietnam War had to be cycled down and stopped. Daniel 11:32 and Psalm 144:1 [KJV] I made some awesome enemies, and some grateful friends, in Washington, DC, for that Tactical Project.

Many readers insist that our pamphlets on Bible doctrine are as enlightening as anything currently in print. Americans, from all walks of Christian life, come from across America to spend a few hours or a weekend with us to learn some of the deeper Scriptural truths. The King of Kings has given us a unique way of making the Bible spring into life. My 64 page pamphlet, titled Desert Shield and the New World Order, has a circulation of 250,000 copies. Some say it is one of the best blends of Bible prophecy and world events available. In January, 1991, as Desert Storm began. I was in Amman, Jordan. As a guest in the palace of King Hussein, a unique, Bible-based, Tactical Proposal was given to the King which was implemented on or about the 17th of January. The net result, and the Northpoint Team goal called Project Sheba, was that Saddam Hussein was convinced to make the surprise military decision to order his troops not to kill Americans in the Desert Storm War. Matthew 12:38-42, Jer.19:11.

Furthermore, I hold a Doctorate in Naturopathic Medicine. I am qualified to teach the Biological Theory Of Ionization, discovered by the late Carey A. Reams, PHD, for the scientific application of food chemistry for the effective treatment of degenerative diseases. My book, The Curse... on the treatment of cancer and other formerly terminal diseases, is to be rewritten in 1993, with the lay housewife, rather than the health professional, in mind. Do not write for it until we announce that it has been published. We do not yet have a price for it! The eleven original editions, now out of print, sold more than 350,000 copies. Through it thousands of people have been given a new lease on life. Matthew 10:5-8.

I am proud to be a Navy Korean War veteran and the Patriotic Instructor of my local Veterans of Foreign Wars Post. As a civilian, I was in Central America for two years working on behalf of the freedom fighters of Nicaragua. Matthew 25: 31-40, Judges 3:23.

From our office over the past twenty eight years, we have published and distributed hundreds of thousands of newsletters and pamphlets on a wide variety of topics. These newsletters do have a modest price on them. You can understand that, but you should also know that all of them are initially mailed free of charge to anyone who writes us asking to be on our mailing list. Our publishing costs are provided by The Northpoint Teams, who graciously support our research and publishing on a monthly basis. I retired from the business world years ago at the age of 36 so that I might give my life"s energy to some of these unusual letters and pamphlets. Let the pamphlets speak for themselves.
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

JamesVincent wrote:
Patriotdiscussions wrote:Yeah, except that is not the case with ponsford. If you go to usa the republic website under the iris link, it has his letter to the iris as well as a per from the iris releasing a 30 year lien for over 1 million dollars.

Now why would they not try to take his stuff or throw him in jail?

Do you have to owe more then a million bucks or something?
Link and cite?
Go to USA the republic website

Go down to irs link

Go down to ponfords letter and irs lien PDF

Should be no problem.
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

Whatever may constitute income, therefore, must have the essential feature of gain to the recipient. This was true when the sixteenth amendment became effective, it was true at the time of the decision in Eisner v. McComber, supra, it was true under section 22(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, and it is likewise true under section 61 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.


If there is no gain, there is no income.


This is from Connor


Tell me please..... What is GAIN?




Accountants and economists may differ greatly as to what is or is not income. It is not, however, their theories that have guided the courts throughout the years. Instead, the courts have chosen to use the meaning given the term "income" by its everyday use in common speech. Helvering v. Edison Bros. 1191*1191 Stores, 133 F.2d 575 (8th Cir. 1943); 1 Mertens, supra, n. 5, p. 2. And the meaning of income in its everyday sense is "a gain or recurrent benefit usually measured in money that derives from capital or labor; also: the amount of such gain recovered by an individual in a given period of time." Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, p. 425 (1965—Emphasis Added). Income is nothing more nor less than realized gain. Shuster v. Helvering, 121 F.2d 643 (2nd Cir. 1941). It is not synonymous with receipts. 47 C.J.S. Internal Revenue § 98, p. 226.


There is that gain word again, what about derives, what does that word mean?

I found this for gains

What is GAIN?

Profits; winnings; increment of value. Gray v. Darlington, 15 Wall. 65, 21L. Ed. 45; Thorn v. De Breteuil, SO App. Div. 405, 83 N. Y. Supp. 840.


So I looked up profits




Most commonly, the gross proceeds of a business transaction less the costs of the transaction; i.e., net proceeds. Excess of revenues over expenses for a transaction; sometimes used synonymously with net income for the period. Gain realized from business or investment over and above expenditures.



I can not see wages being gains or profits, am I missing something here.
chronistra
Scalawag
Scalawag
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:56 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by chronistra »

Patriotdiscussions wrote:Profits; winnings; increment of value.
You have $100 on hand, your employer hands you your paycheck for $1000, and now you have $1100 on hand. The sum of money in your pocket incremented upward in value. You have gained money, and that equals income. QED

You are trying to read the definition as profits AND winnings AND increment of value, that something must meet all three parts, but the correct conjunction is OR. Profits OR winnings OR other increments of value = gain.

You go to the casino and win: you have winnings, which equal gains, which equals income. Your business does well: you have profits, which equal gains, which equals income. You get paid for your labor: you have incremented value, which equal gains, which equals income.
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

:beatinghorse:
chronistra wrote:
Patriotdiscussions wrote:Profits; winnings; increment of value.
You have $100 on hand, your employer hands you your paycheck for $1000, and now you have $1100 on hand. The sum of money in your pocket incremented upward in value. You have gained money, and that equals income. QED

You are trying to read the definition as profits AND winnings AND increment of value, that something must meet all three parts, but the correct conjunction is OR. Profits OR winnings OR other increments of value = gain.

no I am reading it as or not and. Profits my wages are not, winnings my wages are not, the only possible thing could be increment of value, I will post that definition soon. Notice they say income is Derived from capital or labor? What is the derived part mean?

You go to the casino and win: you have winnings, which equal gains, which equals income. Your business does well: you have profits, which equal gains, which equals income. You get paid for your labor: you have incremented value, which equal gains, which equals income.

Here is the definition of increment


1.
something added or gained; addition; increase.

2.
profit; gain.

So if I have five bucks and invest it and make ten bucks, the ten bucks would be an increment of value, the five bucks being the source not the increment correct.

This is what they mean by gain derived from capital no?

A gain derived from labor would be me paying someone 10 bucks to mow my friends yard, and I charge my friend 20 bucks, the 10 dollar profit would be a gain derived from labor correct or would the whole 20 be taxed?
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

chronistra wrote:
Patriotdiscussions wrote:Profits; winnings; increment of value.
You have $100 on hand, your employer hands you your paycheck for $1000, and now you have $1100 on hand. The sum of money in your pocket incremented upward in value. You have gained money, and that equals income. QED

You are trying to read the definition as profits AND winnings AND increment of value, that something must meet all three parts, but the correct conjunction is OR. Profits OR winnings OR other increments of value = gain.

You go to the casino and win: you have winnings, which equal gains, which equals income. Your business does well: you have profits, which equal gains, which equals income. You get paid for your labor: you have incremented value, which equal gains, which equals income.
If we were to trade two cars being the same value, do I experience gain? Is my labor given for free making everything a profit? In order to work I have to have certain things, like a ride,food,clothing and schooling correct?

So my labor is not free, a robots labor is free but mine is not, my labor is equal in value to the wage I am receiving is it not?
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

Is his an accurate quote from so pacific v Lowe?


"... `income' as used in the statute should be given a meaning so as not to include everything that comes in, the true function of the words `gains' and `profits' is to limit the meaning of the word `income'"


Staples v US

"Income within the meaning of the 16th Amendment and the Revenue Act means, gain ... and in such connection gain means profit ... proceeding from property severed from capital, however invested or employed and coming in, received or drawn by the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit and disposal"

What does severed from capital mean?

Sever definition


1.
to separate (a part) from the whole, as by cutting or the like.


Capital definition

Investopedia explains 'Capital'

Capital is different from money. Money is used simply to purchase goods and services for consumption. Capital is more durable and is used to generate wealth through investment. Examples of capital include automobiles, patents, software and brand names. All of these things are inputs that can be used to create wealth. Besides being used in production, capital can be rented out for a monthly or annual fee to create wealth.

Capital itself does not exist until it is produced. Then, to create wealth, capital must be combined with labor, the work of individuals who exchange their time and skills for money. When people invest in capital by foregoing current consumption, they can enjoy greater future prosperity.

Capital has value because of property rights. Individuals or companies can claim ownership to their capital and use it as they please. They can also transfer ownership of their capital to another individual or corporation and keep the sale proceeds. Government regulations limit how capital can be used and diminish its value; the tradeoff is supposed to be some benefit to society. For example, when you sell a stock that has increased in value since you purchased it, you must pay tax on the capital gains. Those taxes are used for public purposes, such as national defense.
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

I have to go to work so I do not have time to review these cases, I am sure you will tell me if they are false.

In the case of Lucas v. Earl, [1930] 281 U.S. 111, the U.S. Supreme Court stated unambiguously that:

"The claim that salaries, wages and compensation for personal services are to be taxed as an entirety and therefore must be returned by the individual who has performed the services which produced the gain is without support either in the language of the Act or in the decisions of the courts construing it. Not only this, but it is directly opposed to provisions of the Act and to regulations of the U.S. Treasury Dept. which either prescribe or permit that compensation for personal services be not taxed as an entirety and be not returned by the individual performing the services. It is to be noted that by the language of the Act it is not salaries, wages or compensation for personal services that are to be included in gross income. That which is to be included is gains, profits and income DERIVED from salaries, wages or compensation for personal service." [Emphasis added]


And


Oliver v halstead 196 va 992

"There is a clear distinction between profit and wages or compensation for labor. Compensation for labor cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law."
Patriotdiscussions
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:27 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by Patriotdiscussions »

Found the Oliver one

https://www.courtlistener.com/va/8bDj/o ... -halstead/


The other one just comes up as a brief, does anyone have link to full case?
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6108
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: How to get my

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

Patriotdiscussions wrote:
So my labor is not free, a robots labor is free but mine is not, my labor is equal in value to the wage I am receiving is it not?
So much verbose word salad; so little time to respond, so I'll confine myself to this: if you get paid X dollars to mow a lawn, what is your cost basis for your labor -- in other words, how much did you pay for your labor? Of course, you paid no one else for it; so the entire $10 is taxable, barring any deductions you may have for gasoline and for wear and tear on your lawn mower.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7564
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: How to get my

Post by wserra »

I was going to respond this morning to Patriotdiscussions' question about the Tweel Court's use of the phrase "moral duty", something I found somewhat strange in a USCA opinion. So I run across this:
Patriotdiscussions wrote:I have to go to work so I do not have time to review these cases, I am sure you will tell me if they are false.
I'm sorry, but I do not see our purpose here as to clean up after your lazy/dishonest ass. Moreover, in the last 36 hours you've hopped from topic to topic like a kangaroo on meth, trailing fake "quotes" at every turn. In hindsight, I was wrong not to leave this thread locked, and now remedy the error. Moreover, continue like this and you will find yourself moderated.

And I don't give a damn about how you might whine elsewhere concerning your treatment here.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Re: How to get my

Post by LPC »

Yes, I know that the topic is locked, but I wanted to add one last comment, which is that most (or all) of the cases that PD most recently cited but did not "have time to review" are cited (and debunked) in the Tax Protestor FAQ, to which PD has been directed several times.

So, there are responses to the cases that PD cited, but as Wes says, it is not "our purpose here ... to clean up after your lazy/dishonest ass."
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.