Page 2 of 3

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:28 pm
by wserra
Well, it's all over now, folks. Doreen has Pete going to bat for her.

In his latest newsletter, about one-third of the way down, Pete describes his "Great Meeting With Michigan's Attorney General's Office". Pete, you see, went to convince the MI state AG's office that they should indict the judge and prosecutors in Doreen's case for various acts of misconduct. The federal judge and prosecutors. Pete thinks the meeting - with a non-lawyer whom the MI AG sends to address Kiwanis Clubs - went "great".

I have it on good authority that, as soon as the door shut behind Pete, the office resounded with hysterical, uncontrollable laughter.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 4:59 pm
by Lambkin
wserra wrote:I have it on good authority that, as soon as the door shut behind Pete, the office resounded with hysterical, uncontrollable laughter.
Followed by a quick shower

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:03 pm
by Gregg
Without the Forum to rally the troops, I can't imagine Pete has more than half a dozen people left who take him seriously.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:45 pm
by notorial dissent
Ole Prattlin' Pete must have used some really "interesting" cleaning solutions in his previous career as a janitor maintenance man. Even for that crowd that is clueless in the extreme.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 1:48 am
by Pottapaug1938
JamesVincent wrote:I didn't think Doreen was particulary smart or attractive so I don't know what her appeal would be......
I don't care to meet her, even if she was Zooey Deschanel-style gorgeous. The things coming out of her mouth would send me running for my life.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:56 pm
by wserra
En banc rehearing denied:
The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. The petition then was circulated to the full court. No judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Therefore, the petition is denied.
Mandate issued. Bye.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:26 pm
by The Observer
wserra wrote:Mandate issued. Bye.
This ends not with a bang but a whimper? Isn't there something idiotic, ridiculous or foolhardy that Pete and Doreen could do to prolong their agony?

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:30 pm
by Dr. Caligari
Isn't there something idiotic, ridiculous or foolhardy that Pete and Doreen could do to prolong their agony?
They could file "educated" returns for 2016...

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 11:12 pm
by Gregg
Maybe blow up a mailbox?


Which I'm sure will go over even better now than it did in 1990.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 11:45 pm
by Lambkin
Dr. Caligari wrote:They could file "educated" returns for 2016...
This seems very likely. I suspect they will at least invalidate the jurat.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:42 am
by notorial dissent
The Observer wrote:
wserra wrote:Mandate issued. Bye.
This ends not with a bang but a whimper? Isn't there something idiotic, ridiculous or foolhardy that Pete and Doreen could do to prolong their agony?
Observer, you should know by now that where the Hapless Henricksons are concerned there is always the possibility. I have been speculating about whether or not they filed valid returns for the years following their convictions, or any returns at all, but since they are both at this point effectively unemployed that may be moot, since as far as we know Doreen hasn't been working and Pete's book grift has pretty much dried up I'm kind of curious as to what they are living on.

However, as far as the Hendricksons are concerned, if there is a stupid assed destructive thing to be done, they will find it and do it.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:37 pm
by The Observer
notorial dissent wrote:However, as far as the Hendricksons are concerned, if there is a stupid assed destructive thing to be done, they will find it and do it.
Thanks, (I think), ND, for reassuring my faith in the stupidity of mankind.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2016 12:05 am
by notorial dissent
The Observer wrote:
notorial dissent wrote:However, as far as the Hendricksons are concerned, if there is a stupid assed destructive thing to be done, they will find it and do it.
Thanks, (I think), ND, for reassuring my faith in the stupidity of mankind.
Based on past experience, just stating the obvious, the fact that they are still fighting the last conviction, as well as reality itself, I'd say it was a sucker bet.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:14 pm
by Famspear
Sixty-one year old Doreen Hendrickson, inmate # 48564-039, is now shown as being at the "Detroit Residential Reentry Management field office" of the Federal Bureau of Prisons -- which is actually located at Milan, Michigan, just southwest of Detroit. Presumably, that's part of the same Federal facility at which Preposterous Pete (the Fabulous Felon, the Haughty Hendrickson) spent his second prison term.

Dorty Doreen is still scheduled for release a month from today -- on Sunday, September 4, 2016.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:33 pm
by .
Perhaps the two of them can get together to write a companion volume to CtC.

Something like "The Best of the Bureau of Prisons: Our Life Following CtC" based on their combined and not insignificant federal prison experiences.

A compendium of advice about things like what the real bargains are in the commissary and other tips for the newly incarcerated CtC bonehead.

If they were actually honest about their folly, it could be a minor best-seller.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:02 pm
by Famspear
. wrote:Perhaps the two of them can get together to write a companion volume to CtC.

Something like "The Best of the Bureau of Prisons: Our Life Following CtC" based on their combined and not insignificant federal prison experiences.

A compendium of advice about things like what the real bargains are in the commissary and other tips for the newly incarcerated CtC bonehead.

If they were actually honest about their folly, it could be a minor best-seller.
In which case, they could realize lots of book royalty income.

In which case, they would have yet another opportunity to file more false Federal income tax returns, claiming that the royalty income was not taxable.

In which case, they could be indicted, tried, convicted, and sent back to Federal prison.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 7:23 pm
by Cpt Banjo
Famspear wrote:In which case, they could realize lots of book royalty income.

In which case, they would have yet another opportunity to file more false Federal income tax returns, claiming that the royalty income was not taxable.

In which case, they could be indicted, tried, convicted, and sent back to Federal prison.
Ah, but if they made the mistake of copyrighting the book, their royalties would have been derived from the exercise of a federal privilege -- copyright -- and therefore taxable even under their own idiotic theory.

Hoist by their own petard!

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 8:32 pm
by notorial dissent
Has anyone kept even a rough count of their followers who have emulated them and done Federal time? Should make a select and exclusive little group.

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 12:19 pm
by Famspear
notorial dissent wrote:Has anyone kept even a rough count of their followers who have emulated them and done Federal time? Should make a select and exclusive little group.
So far, about nine people (including Doreen) have served time in Federal prison for following Pete.

1. Doreen Hendrickson
2. Roger Menner
3. Eugene George Warner
4. Michael O'Daniel
5. Carmen D'Agostino
6. Gregory Boyd
7. James Stuart
8. James Back
9. Peter Giambalvo

See:

http://tpgurus.wikidot.com/peter-hendrickson

Re: Doreen's Appeal

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 2:45 pm
by Judge Roy Bean
Ah, yes, "The Nitwit Nine."