Farmer Giles wrote:thats it? thats the best that you can do? You really cant tell us the tax consequences here? I thought you were a Judge! How can you be so ignorant? I declare you impeached!
Dearest Farmer Giles, here's a clue: Your postings are of little value or importance. They are trivial. They are not properly serious or sensible. Your thoughts on these matters involving federal income taxation are, well, frivolous. They are not worthy of serious consideration.
So, when you fail to elicit responses that satisfy you, the failure is not for want of expert knowledge on the part of the Quatloos regulars here, to whom your blather is directed. The fault, dear Farmer, lies in your own stars. If you want to understand why your arguments do not appear
to you receive the attention you believe they deserve, this may help:
Frivolous. of little value or importance; trifling; trivial [ . . . ] not properly serious or sensible; silly and light-minded; giddy.
---Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 560, World Publishing Co. (2d Coll. Ed. 1978).
Frivolous. of little weight or importance [ . . . ] lacking in seriousness [ . . . ] irresponsibly self-indulgent.
---Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, p. 461, G. & C. Merriam Co. (8th Ed. 1976).
Frivolous. Unworthy of serious attention; trivial [ . . .] inappropriately silly.
---American Heritage Dictionary, p. 535, Houghton Mifflin Co. (2d Coll. Ed. 1985).
In reviewing your posts, the word "gibberish" comes to mind.....
Gibberish. unintelligible or meaningless language [ . . . ].
---Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, p. 484, G. & C. Merriam Co. (8th Ed. 1976).
In other words, your thoughts, as you are expressing them here, are receiving no less attention than they merit. Indeed, many of your fellow posters here appear to be cutting you an undeserved amount of slack.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
