Quatloos!

Relator Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., is currently a Citizen of Washington State and nationally recognized Private Attorney General living and working in Seattle, Washington State.

During the period in question, Defendant James Marcy has claimed to be a Special Agent doing Criminal Investigation for the Internal Revenue Service with offices in Cheyenne, Wyoming.

However, Mr. Marcy has failed to produce any credentials proving said claim, after being presented with a proper Request under the Freedom of Information Act for valid U.S. Office of Personnel Management Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution and by the Federal laws at 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331.

During the period in question, Defendant Dave Guest has also claimed to be a Special Agent doing Criminal Investigation for the Internal Revenue Service with offices in Fort Collins, Colorado.

However, Mr. Guest has also failed to produce any credentials proving said claim, after being presented with a proper Request under the Freedom of Information Act for valid U.S. Office of Personnel Management Standard Form 61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution and by the Federal laws at 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331.

John Doe #1 thru John Doe #20 are as yet unnamed accomplices, accessories and/or co-conspirators with Defendants Marcy and Guest.

[ . . . ]


On June 11, 2013 A.D., without any appointment Defendants Marcy and Guest confronted Relator on the sidewalk in front of Relator’s mailing service in Seattle, Washington.

Defendant Marcy presented Relator with paperwork which was styled “search warrant”, but it lacked the authorized signature of a Clerk or Deputy Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington State. See 28 U.S.C. 1691, in chief.

Said “search warrant” was also signed by one James P. Donohue doing business as a “U.S. Magistrate Judge”. However, Mr. Donohue has also failed or refused to produce the OPM SF-61 APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS required of him by the Oath of Office Clause in the U.S. Constitution and by the Federal laws at 5 U.S.C. sections 2903, 2906 and 3331.

A third man identified himself as a U.S. Marshal named “Ray”, but “Ray” refused to produce a business card, badge, or to disclose his full name to Relator.

Relator verbally objected to these three (3) men for the specific defects in said “search warrant” which are summarized above.

When Relator refused to consent to a search or seizure of private property inside Relator’s dwelling unit, “Ray” stated his intent to “break in”. Relator immediately objected to “Ray” that breaking and entering is a felony.

Relator then announced his specific intent to go straightaway to the Office of Clerk at the U.S. District Court in downtown Seattle, to confirm in person whether or not the required credentials were in the legal custody of that Office, as required by 5 U.S.C. 2906.

Relator did go straightaway to that Clerk’s Office and was met at the entrance of the Federal Courthouse by a Deputy U.S. Marshal who is assigned to Relator in his capacity as a qualified Federal Witness.

That Deputy U.S. Marshal then escorted Relator to the public counter of the Clerk’s Office in that Federal Courthouse.

A woman seated at that public counter refused to produce any of the requested credentials, and she also stated clearly that “they were not going to cooperate” with Relator.

The latter refusal to cooperate was witnessed by the Deputy U.S. Marshal who accompanied Relator to that public counter.

While leaving the Federal Courthouse, Relator was told by said Deputy U.S. Marshal that the “search warrant” was in the process of being executed.

While walking back to his dwelling unit, Relator contacted the Seattle Police Department and requested a civil standby. Two (2) Seattle Police Officers responded promptly and drove Relator back to his apartment building.

The federal “agents” who were executing said “search warrant” evidently told the lead Seattle Police Officer that it was “valid”.

Because of the missing credentials for Mr. Donohue, and for Mr. William M. McCool whose name appeared in the rubber stamp on said “search warrant”, Relator has concluded that “Ray” and Defendants Marcy and Guest lied to Relator’s landlord, they lied to Relator’s neighbors, and they lied to two (2) Seattle Police Officers.

All Defendants presently remain in possession and/or control of stolen property, seized from Relator’s dwelling unit under color of official right and under patently false and fraudulent pretenses.

[ . . . ]

I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the “United States” (Federal Government), that the above statement of facts and laws is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). See Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties are all the supreme Law of the Land).

Dated: July 26, 2013 A.D.

MODELESKI operated the "Supreme Law Firm" out of a rented one-bedroom apartment in Seattle.

Famspear wrote:Whoah! This IS a shocker.



And, the way the news is delivered! Demo, you've been makin' yerself kinda scarce lately. But this time, you come around bringin' big news.....

Demosthenes wrote:

Famspear wrote:Whoah! This IS a shocker.



And, the way the news is delivered! Demo, you've been makin' yerself kinda scarce lately. But this time, you come around bringin' big news.....

You mean like the fact that I finally have a release date for the book?

Demosthenes wrote:

Famspear wrote:Whoah! This IS a shocker.



And, the way the news is delivered! Demo, you've been makin' yerself kinda scarce lately. But this time, you come around bringin' big news.....

You mean like the fact that I finally have a release date for the book?

Demosthenes wrote:You mean like the fact that I finally have a release date for the book?

Demosthenes wrote:Indicted.

http://cheatingfrenzy.com/PAM_indict.pdf

grixit wrote:Yeah someone should contact ENM and let her know.

BTW, i've forgotten. Is PAM the one with the magic spell of indictment bouncing that says if you prosecute him, you're actually prosecuting yourself? Or was that someone else?