But then I watched her videos. I was so wrong. O.o fellow Quatloosians we have a Reamer!
Although that is perhaps being a little unfair. while it is true she, like ream, is being egged on by older members of the community who know full well no freeman theory has ever worked she has been through the system before and should know better.
So a brief introduction to the wee darling of English freemanary. Calling herself Hannah Rose on facebook, her real name is Hannah Sholtbot from in Gloucestershire. In 2012 she bottled a girl in a nightclub while dressed as Red Riding Hood. She was senatnced to five months in prison. Not so nice and innocent now. After her release she claimed to be “reformed” and got involved in some charity work. The local paper has a story here:
http://www.gloucestercitizen.co.uk/jail ... story.html
But then earlier this year she reformed again into a freewoman, and started making vidoes about her journey. In this one she cites dean clifford, robert menard and kate of gaia as good influences. She buys into stawman theory, driving vs travelling, law as contact, courts as admirality law, the whole sheband short of birth bonds. She then sent Notices of understanding and claims of right to the queen, prime minister, archbishop of Canterbury, the police, the dvla etc etc
the documents can be viewed here:http://www.mediafire.com/download/yhs57 ... ents+3.zip
so we have a:
NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND CLAIM OF RIGHT
NOTICE OF LAWFUL TAX REBELLION
NOTICE OF RECINSION OF LISCENCE
and reply to the dvla.
Lets start with the NoUaCoR:
it begins with the usual vague pseudo maxims that are more philosophy than law and then digs into the real freewoman stuff:
nope, see Scotland from 1979-1997 which was governed by a government which was unable to hold more than one or two scottish seats or indeed any constituency or region that has ever voted for a party that ended up in opposition. Further you were governed without consent when you were in prison for 5 months- could you just have revoked consent and walked out? Dean clifford thinks he can hows it working for him?Whereas it is my understanding that representation requires mutual consent, and, Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution and/or Bill of Rights, and,
nope because of the doctrine discussed yesterday: Parliamentary sovereignity: while the doctrine has been weakened and now statute are to be interpreted to be in line with EU regulations and the Human rights act, the constitution has no binding power over Parliament and its acts.
nope otherwise tourists and terrorists would be immune to prosecution.Whereas it is my understanding that said scope and applicability is limited to members and employees of government,
ditto nope.Whereas it is my understanding that those who have an NI number (National Insurance Number) are in fact employees of the UK Government and are thus bound by the statutes created by the UK Government, and,
Whereas I understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s NI number, and, Whereas it is my understanding that human beings in the United Kingdom have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
you may revoke consent to be governed by leaving the islands and going somewhere we do not have a deportation agreement with. Iran perhaps?
and yet government without consent is exactly what happened to Roger Hayes.Whereas it is my understanding that if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas I Hannah Rose: Shotbolt am a Freewoman-on-the-Land,
More freeman waffle about licenses then:
no it is not. As words are to be used in their “plain and ordinary meaning” in UK law this dictionary should be fine:http://www.thefreedictionary.com/by-lawWhereas it is my understanding that a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
See there first primary definition: a local or subordinate law.By´-law` (bī´-lạ`)
A local or subordinate law; a private law or regulation made by a corporation for its own government.
There was likewise a law to restrain the by-laws, or ordinances of corporations.
The law or institution; to which are added two by-laws, as a comment upon the general law.
A law that is less important than a general law or constitutional provision, and subsidiary to it; a rule relating to a matter of detail; as,civic societies often adopt a constitution and by-laws for the government of their members. In this sense the word has probably beeninfluenced by by, meaning secondary or aside.
tell me have you ever heard of the time the British East India company governed India without the local's consent? In any case HMG is not a corporation so no matter.Whereas it is my understanding that corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
nope quite the opposite. But seeing as you seem to have changed your mind on this one i'll let it slide.Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and creates no obligation or dishonour if ignored, and,
We then have a foisted unilateral agreement where she makes all kinds of declarations but then again I have often observed a certain drunk shouting similar outlandish claims at pigeons in Aberdeen. So she can declare all she likes the court will not listen any more than the pigeons.
Her NOTICE OF LAWFUL TAX REBELLION is a letter stating that because of the wars of the past decade she shouldn't have to pay tax. As we are no longer in Iraq and leaving Afghanistan I am sure she will be back to paying tax in no time! On a side note I'm sure this argument worked really well for Roger Hayes. Oh wait his house was repossessed so he tried to arrest a judge and went to prison.
Notice of Recinding of licence
this was repiled to by the DVLA who basically told her she needed a liscence to drive so responds with definitions from Blacks law dictionary.
Thank you for your recent correspondence dated 24th May 2014 correctly addressed to me Hannah the human woman. I did notice however, that you have directed the contents of your letter to my sole corporation Miss Hannah Shotbolt. I understand that although you have addressed it correctly to me you have not written it to me…. Very clever
Since I am executive, administrator and beneficiary to said artificial person/ legal entity/ sole corporation Miss Hannah Shotbolt I will be dealing with this matter. For the record though I am indeed Hannah, a real life woman and not a soulless fiction.
With regards to the ‘points’ you made in reference to The road traffic act 1988 and the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994 I would like to confirm that I understand acts to be statutes and statutes are not laws. It is an established fact that statutes can only have the force of law with the consent of the governed and as I have evidenced in my claim of right I have in fact withdrawn consent to be represented and thus governed by any other human. Therefore these ‘laws’ as you call them have no effect on me as a free woman.
I will however for and on the record rebut individually each of your ‘points’
Legally speaking I am not a driver.
Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition
Driver. 1. A person who steers and propels a vehicle. 2. A person who herds animals; a drover.
Black’s Law dictionary 4th Edition
One Employed in conducting or operating a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though not a street railroad car. A person actually doing driving, whether employed by owner to drive or driving his own vehicle.
Black’s Law dictionary 2nd Edition
One Employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon or other vehicle, with horses, mules or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though not a street railroad car.
Legally the word ‘driver’ clearly describes a PERSON employed in the act of operating a vehicle. Since I am not employed to operate my car as I am neither a taxi, nor a courier etc. I do not require a licence to exercise what is in fact a God given right to travel freely. I am not acting as an agent of government as I am acting as Hannah the ‘natural person’
The 9th edition definition of the word ‘driver’ is different from the earlier revisions of the word as the deception on society increased. I’m not here to school you but if you want to check out The word ‘person’ in Black’s law dictionary. You will see there is a well-established divide between two separate entities. One of the natural person (human being) and the other of an ‘artificial person’ the latter is created by government without full disclosure via the registration of our birth. The reason the word employed can be taken out of this ‘revised’ definition is because the definition of ‘person’ has also been revised. Legally a ‘person’ can be either of two entities. You are presuming I am a trustee to my sole corporation. I am informing you that I am in fact executive, administrator and beneficiary. The government is trustee.
As a free woman I do not give permission for my legal name to be used as personal identification and thus I am not bound by your ‘laws’.
I will for legal purposes in this matter define myself as a traveller which I define below from Black’s Law dictionary
Black’s Law Dictionary 9th Edition
Traveler. A person who passes from place to place, for any reason.
[ii] With regards the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act I have made my position clear with regards to paying tax in my notarised notice of lawful tax rebellion. I understand that the people of this country have a lawful duty, under the laws of war, to refuse to pay tax if we believe our governments are using the money to fund the murder and genocide of innocent civilians abroad. Which I do very strongly believe to be the case. As my notice of tax rebellion is a notarised, closed document, I suggest you contact the queen or the archbishop directly if you wish to discuss this matter further.
[iii] “ A citizen has the right to travel and to transport his property upon the public highways in the ordinary course of life and business. However, if one exercises the Right to Travel (without first giving up the Right and converting that Right into a privilege) the citizen is by STATUTE guilty of a crime. This amounts to converting the exercise of a Constitutional Right to a crime.”
Recall the Miller vs U.S
Unless you can provide proof of claim Michelle, that the DVLA or anybody actually can/do own the public roads then in implying that I would be breaking the law to travel with no license you are guilty of the following offences; deception, obstruction, perjury, and gross negligence equal to fraud.
Whereas I understand a license to be a commercial contract. Whereby in the act of SUBMITTING an APPLICATION for a LICENSE you are in fact wilfully waiving a right. Ie. Right to travel.
As I attempted to return to you in good faith my provisional driver’s licence card for your disposal I shall instead be forced dispose of it myself. I lost the paper part years ago and have no intention of purchasing a new one just to return to you. I am informing you now that I have disposed of the card and be it now known that any actual or presumed contract between us is now rescinded.
I trust my letter has clarified you too.
American Law dictionaries not binding in the UK, checkmate.
Now up until this point our little English rose has been a bit of a fool but not actually broken the law since her fall to freewomanhood. But then on 17 June she was arrested the audio is here : https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=61 ... permPage=1
difficult to be sure exactly what the charges are but it seems from the comments that weed, driving without a licence and being uninsured are all involved. Seems the police had to break into her car to get her out. Its a fairly short listen.
Now that she has seen the police response to freewomanism is she going to back down? Helll noo hearts of oak and all that! She has this video of her preparation for her day in court on the 25 july :
it is Ream all over again.
In Scotland it is not uncommon for people to use the phrase grasp the thistle, but I'm afraid Miss Sotbolt would be much better dropping the rose.
Anyway that's enough silly English girls for one day.