Re: Peter of England: A REal guru.
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:07 pm
I've got as far as 1h 24m 23s, taking extensive notes. But Andromeda is on the telly so I'll watch the rest later. I'll comment on Peter's video when I've seen it all.
Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/
Fred, You are made of Good Sound Stuff!!! I gave up (for a bit....) at 38mins.littleFred wrote:I've got as far as 1h 24m 23s, taking extensive notes. But Andromeda is on the telly so I'll watch the rest later. I'll comment on Peter's video when I've seen it all.
I got $5 billion in assets as promissory notes to myself. Someone alert Forbes so they can put me on the richest people list.The bank has £12-15 million in assets as promissory notes
Bravo LittleFred great job.....well done! Thank You.littleFred wrote:Yeah, me too! In this video, Peter seemed certain the PNs have value. If he is right, then each sucker is on the hook for £150,000.
When he was talking about the foreign gentlemen with two boxes each worth £250 billion of which he now owns 5%, I kept thinking I should reply to the emails I keep getting about someone who has died in some far-off place who had stashed millions way somewhere and if I help keep it out of the hands of a tyranny I can keep 5%.
I feel I should apologise for the length of my summary. The video was mostly junk, but with some interesting personal claims at the 20 minute mark. If he really has a law degree then he has no excuse for misreading BoE 1882. If he has a degree of any sort then he has no excuse for thinking suppliers will be happy with WeRe cheques.
Again, Peter can't read legislation.Section 143 of this Act does not apply to a vehicle owned by a person who has deposited and keeps deposited with the Accountant General of the [F1Senior Courts] the sum of [F2£500,000], at a time when the vehicle is being driven under the owner’s control.
So this would only apply to vehicles owned by WeRe Bank. Suckers will have to sign over their cars to WeRe bank.... a vehicle owned by a person who has deposited ...
This appears to be a well-worn bit of mythology. Counterfeited "Mother Boxes" of lost Federal Reserve bonds, which are "found" and sold to gullible fools in great quantity.littleFred wrote:1hr 5m 0s: Peter met business people from Kuala Lumpa. They had 1934 Chicago Federal Reserve gold certificates. Two boxes, each worth $250 billion. Peter spent last year negotiating with Chinese to get these boxes redeemed. Peter's bank now has 5% of this, if they are ever redeemed. We can trade with this. In WWII, the Nazis and Japanese stripped wealth from the world. This stuff does exist.
Excellent, thanks.Hercule Parrot wrote:This appears to be a well-worn bit of mythology. ...
And not a surprise.littleFred wrote:In a nutshell: he didn't address my concerns.
at a time when the vehicle is being driven under the owner's controllittleFred wrote:Flushed with success, Peter has just added yet another hook to his scheme: from July, members won't need motor insurance. Re-Insurance says the WeRe Bank is depositing £500,000, and quotes the Act:Again, Peter can't read legislation.Section 143 of this Act does not apply to a vehicle owned by a person who has deposited and keeps deposited with the Accountant General of the [F1Senior Courts] the sum of [F2£500,000], at a time when the vehicle is being driven under the owner’s control.So this would only apply to vehicles owned by WeRe Bank. Suckers will have to sign over their cars to WeRe bank.... a vehicle owned by a person who has deposited ...
Now compare this below to the above. I bet you can’t tell me who said this back in 2011? AND NO CHEATING!, I`ll know if you cheat.littleFred wrote:41m 50s: The unit of currency. In 2010 he worked with Global Settlement Foundation. Too electronic for Peter's taste. Needed way of earning equal units of currency any place in the world. Bank has infinite supply. Banks create money from thin air, and this is bad. Quantitative easing is bad, merely increasing stock prices. Printing more money creates inflation. The rich get richer.
58m 21s: What assets does the bank have? None. We use promissory notes. There is no such thing as money. The PNs are a commitment to the ReMovement, not the bank.
1hr 5m 0s: Peter met business people from Kuala Lumpa. They had 1934 Chicago Federal Reserve gold certificates. Two boxes, each worth $250 billion. Peter spent last year negotiating with Chinese to get these boxes redeemed. Peter's bank now has 5% of this, if they are ever redeemed. We can trade with this. In WWII, the Nazis and Japanese stripped wealth from the world. This stuff does exist.
1hr 21m 30s:We have to go down this path of proving that we have got something there, is so that we can't be accused of, or can't come across as an accusation of fraud if they say, well, you've got nothing in there anyway."
1h 24m 0s: If you are taken to court for not paying, you can prove you have paid it, because these slips will accompany the cheques.
32:26What were going to do is where going to set up escrow accounts for the Gas Companies, the Electric Companies, the Water Companies and the Council tax. Yes, so when you get your Council Tax bill or your electricity bill, water bill gas bill, you`ll be able to pay those through the Escrow account and settle that bill.
And when they say to you, ‘well you haven`t paid your bill’, you can say `well yes I have here`s my bank statement said so’. And they’re going to say `well hang on a minute, that money has just been created out of nothing’, and were` going to say to them `guess what, so is yours’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4ZcTwsubzkWere also prepared to defend anyone in the courts , if the gas electric take you to court, we will have our own lawyers call them what you will, they key point is we will see them in the courts, but we will see them in our courts, common law courts.
I'll presume you've not looked at the Global Settlement Foundation's website. It has a page dedicated to Sherlock Holmes. Which is a treasure trove of information that, as I mentioned earlier, confuses Sherlock Holmes with a real person and not a fictional consulting detective.notorial dissent wrote:
I can't imagine what he could possibly have been doing at Global Settlement Foundation, janitor perhaps, but that requires ability, which I think he is sorely lacking.
On the web page Times we find a quotation that smacks of Peter's "Re" Movement:Global Settlement Foundation wrote:Common law underpins the Court of Record. There is material to read in great detail covered in the Finality of Settlement series from the Magna Carta to contemporary efforts by people in America.
The beauty of the common law process is that it is self correcting. We know that there are people in America working to correct the mistakes there. Here are some of the mistakes (1) Trying to maintain the 'credit' of the people and (2) Trying to 'restore' a dead legal fiction that was originally set up for trafficking in persons.
Common law is led by the requirement to find the truth appertaining to the crime and applicable to the situation. It is not the other way around as in legal law which has multifarious boxes into which every situation is forced to fit.
Common law used to be taught at Law school. There are many people who appear to be teaching common law. It can be seen that common law is not in active practice by the men and women on land. Clearly, if you do not pay with deliverable substance for service at the clerk of a court, you are not in a Court of Record.
Courts of Record should not be hasty to come to conclusions regarding the financial war that is going on.
The GSF which pretends to be based in Liechtenstein or Switzerland gives a postal address of Joseph Ray Sundarsson Global Isles Court of Record, 115 George Lane, South Woodford, London E18 1AB. From having a look on Google it appears to be a normal East London residential street and not the headquarters of an organisation employing between 51-200 people, nor does it seem to have any address in Panama. It would appear that the profile on LinkedIn is designed to give an appearance of a substantially larger company than the one that exists in reality. This is the website for the court of record, which is also worth viewing as it confirms that the GSF is a Sovrun/Fmotl operation. http://www.courtofrecord.org.uk/index.htmlGlobal Settlement Foundation wrote:A given unit of energy can be used to create wealth or wasted in creating a tally stick.
Ye capitalists, you have been a victim of your own greed, lust and death worship.
Great! So when the thing blows up in their faces we can all chorus "No shit, Sherlock!"
Having though about this a bit more it is making even less sense.littleFred wrote:Flushed with success, Peter has just added yet another hook to his scheme: from July, members won't need motor insurance. Re-Insurance says the WeRe Bank is depositing £500,000, and quotes the Act:Again, Peter can't read legislation.Section 143 of this Act does not apply to a vehicle owned by a person who has deposited and keeps deposited with the Accountant General of the [F1Senior Courts] the sum of [F2£500,000], at a time when the vehicle is being driven under the owner’s control.
Peter says he is providing motor insurance cover and to do this he is relying on a law that can only be applied when there is no insurance cover.Re-Insurance – Car & Motor vehicle Insurance is to be issued and made available to ALL Re-Members by July 2015.
No doubt Peter will be sending one of his promissory notes. Or maybe he will send a few of the promissory notes that his marks have sent him. When they get rejected he will claim that because payment has been refused the liability has been discharged.notorial dissent wrote:and I'm also betting they don't take funny money, non-cashable checks, or IOU's.
Report to Action Fraud has been made. Can I encourage others to follow suit? Despite the entertainment value WeRe Bank is providing, there's real potential for people to end up in serious financial difficulty because of it. Some of the Goofy (Peter of England, Spainiard, Ceylon, etc) deserve everything coming to them. But people who don't understand finance and are taken in by this need protecting from making some bad decisions as a result of being misled by charlatans.Thank you for contacting the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with your concerns about weRe Bank.
I have searched for the firm weRe Bank on our Financial Services Register, which is a public database of all the firms we authorise and regulate. No results have been returned based upon the information you have provided. This would indicate that this firm is not regulated by ourselves. You may wish to search for them yourself in the event you have more information to rely on, I have provided the link below to our register for you:
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/firmSearchForm.do
Your next steps
You may wish to report this to an organisation called Action Fraud. Action fraud provides a central point of contact for information about fraud and financially motivated internet crime. You can contact them on 0300 123 2040 or visit http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/contact-us.
What i will do
We do take very seriously information provided by the public which help us in our regulatory investigations that we make. We gather such information to develop a picture of where firms may be failing to meet our standards. Therefore details of your case have been forwarded to the unauthorised business department within the FCA for their consideration and action as appropriate. Unfortunately we are unable to disclose to you if we are investigating your concerns or not. I appreciate this must be frustrating, but rest assured, the information you provide us will be reviewed carefully.
I would like to thank you for bringing this to our attention.