jimmywx11

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 9371
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: jimmywx11

Postby notorial dissent » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:16 am

I would assume that if someone made that request that the supplier would just shut them off at the mains and then be done with it and the new supplier would be the only one who could legally turn it back on.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2321
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: jimmywx11

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:50 am

notorial dissent wrote:I would assume that if someone made that request that the supplier would just shut them off at the mains and then be done with it and the new supplier would be the only one who could legally turn it back on.
Not sure it would get that far. As someone mentioned earlier all meters, I think, have a unique reference number (MPAN? for electric). If you change a meter I would think one, it has to be by an authorised and qualified person and two, there has to be an unique meter number on the meter going in. Utility companies have stocks of pre-checked, pre-labelled meters to replace broken ones, so no issue with doing it properly. Doing it the Jimmy Wyld Idiot way and the existing supplier will just prosecute you for damaging the meter/ interfering with the supply / unauthorised working / etc.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 830
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: jimmywx11

Postby AndyPandy » Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:20 pm

ArthurWankspittle wrote:
notorial dissent wrote:I would assume that if someone made that request that the supplier would just shut them off at the mains and then be done with it and the new supplier would be the only one who could legally turn it back on.
Not sure it would get that far. As someone mentioned earlier all meters, I think, have a unique reference number (MPAN? for electric). If you change a meter I would think one, it has to be by an authorised and qualified person and two, there has to be an unique meter number on the meter going in. Utility companies have stocks of pre-checked, pre-labelled meters to replace broken ones, so no issue with doing it properly. Doing it the Jimmy Wyld Idiot way and the existing supplier will just prosecute you for damaging the meter/ interfering with the supply / unauthorised working / etc.

There's a central database for registered mpan numbers, if the meter/mpan isn't on the database the supplier won't connect to it or will disconnect an unregistered meter and like you say prosecute you for theft of electricity and interference with a meter.

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: jimmywx11

Postby Bones » Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:55 pm

Getting back to business - Jimmy is still full of shit and in denial about being bankrupt

User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: jimmywx11

Postby NYGman » Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:59 pm

Bones wrote:Getting back to business - Jimmy is still full of shit and in denial about being bankrupt


Any updates on his stupidity?? I need something new to laugh at...
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 830
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: jimmywx11

Postby AndyPandy » Thu Aug 11, 2016 8:54 pm

NYGman wrote:
Bones wrote:Getting back to business - Jimmy is still full of shit and in denial about being bankrupt


Any updates on his stupidity?? I need something new to laugh at...


Just don't mention the 'B' word !! :snicker:

Firthy2002
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:24 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: jimmywx11

Postby Firthy2002 » Thu Aug 11, 2016 10:03 pm

NYGman wrote:
Bones wrote:Getting back to business - Jimmy is still full of shit and in denial about being bankrupt


Any updates on his stupidity?? I need something new to laugh at...


Here's a lovely anti-Semitic video regarding the Biggins CBB thing. I've flagged it so there's a chance it may disappear shortly.
-=Firthy2002=-

Watching idiots dig themselves into holes since 2016.

exiledscouser
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:01 pm

Re: jimmywx11

Postby exiledscouser » Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:01 pm

Bones wrote:Getting back to business - Jimmy is still full of shit and in denial about being bankrupt


Linky please Bones. His youtoob channel is a merry-go-round of anti semitic bilge, drug manufacture and cancer cure quackery.

But no mention there of not being bankrupt even though he is.

Has the recent invasion blown over? Its been like the Blazing Saddles scene when the cowboys break into the dance studio.

Strange people having, it seemed to me, stranger conversations - with themselves. I was never sure which sock puppet was which or whether the whole episode was someone's idea of a giant piss take. Apologies for the ot comment but I didn't want to fan the flames by adding to the more recent obsessional bickering he-said she-said ranty posts. Enough already!

I hope we can get back to exposing scam artists and failed gurus.

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 830
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: jimmywx11

Postby AndyPandy » Fri Aug 12, 2016 11:54 am

Am I reading this right - 3 years from bankruptcy the dwelling (home) of the bankrupt is no longer his?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/198 ... ction/283A

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2321
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: jimmywx11

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Fri Aug 12, 2016 1:29 pm

AndyPandy wrote:Am I reading this right - 3 years from bankruptcy the dwelling (home) of the bankrupt is no longer his?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/198 ... ction/283A
I think you are mis reading it. I read it as if no one does anything about him owning a house while bankrupt then it goes back to him after three years. I would think it is to prevent trustees sitting on property waiting for it to go up in value. Further, it is just a reasonable timeline to "get on with it" as far as selling the place. Jimmy's house will be someone else's within a year, short of Jimmy winning the lottery or getting a massive inheritance. Check the exceptions in this paragraph:
(3)Subsection (2) shall not apply if during the period mentioned in that subsection—

(a)the trustee realises the interest mentioned in subsection (1),

(b)the trustee applies for an order for sale in respect of the dwelling-house,

(c)the trustee applies for an order for possession of the dwelling-house,

(d)the trustee applies for an order under section 313 in Chapter IV in respect of that interest, or

(e)the trustee and the bankrupt agree that the bankrupt shall incur a specified liability to his estate (with or without the addition of interest from the date of the agreement) in consideration of which the interest mentioned in subsection (1) shall cease to form part of the estate.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 830
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: jimmywx11

Postby AndyPandy » Fri Aug 12, 2016 1:36 pm

ArthurWankspittle wrote:
AndyPandy wrote:Am I reading this right - 3 years from bankruptcy the dwelling (home) of the bankrupt is no longer his?

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/198 ... ction/283A
I think you are mis reading it. I read it as if no one does anything about him owning a house while bankrupt then it goes back to him after three years. I would think it is to prevent trustees sitting on property waiting for it to go up in value. Further, it is just a reasonable timeline to "get on with it" as far as selling the place. Jimmy's house will be someone else's within a year, short of Jimmy winning the lottery or getting a massive inheritance. Check the exceptions in this paragraph:
(3)Subsection (2) shall not apply if during the period mentioned in that subsection—

(a)the trustee realises the interest mentioned in subsection (1),

(b)the trustee applies for an order for sale in respect of the dwelling-house,

(c)the trustee applies for an order for possession of the dwelling-house,

(d)the trustee applies for an order under section 313 in Chapter IV in respect of that interest, or

(e)the trustee and the bankrupt agree that the bankrupt shall incur a specified liability to his estate (with or without the addition of interest from the date of the agreement) in consideration of which the interest mentioned in subsection (1) shall cease to form part of the estate.


Right, so basically, if they're going for possession of a house they have to do it within 3 years ?

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2321
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: jimmywx11

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Fri Aug 12, 2016 1:49 pm

AndyPandy wrote:Right, so basically, if they're going for possession of a house they have to do it within 3 years ?
That's my reading of it. I think it is all part of getting it sorted out in a reasonable timescale without either side being allowed to mess about. Jimmy's situation is relatively straightforward. He has a house and very few other assets and owes, what, £20k? Plus fees? Answer is sell the house and give him the change. It would prevent the situation of a bankruptcy dragging on for years where the bankruptee has multiple assets and may be able to keep their house but pay up from other assets. Look a bit funny if someone says four years down the line: sorry we are £500 short we are going to have to repossess your £500k mansion.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

User avatar
Skeleton
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:37 am
Location: Thailand

Re: jimmywx11

Postby Skeleton » Fri Aug 12, 2016 1:57 pm

On a side note, Jimmy recently posted a video about making Cannabis coffee, I can't link to it but it looks like he is back in Castle Wyled going by the kitchen. I could be wrong.
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played. :lol: :lol:

User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: jimmywx11

Postby NYGman » Fri Aug 12, 2016 2:16 pm

Skeleton wrote:On a side note, Jimmy recently posted a video about making Cannabis coffee, I can't link to it but it looks like he is back in Castle Wyled going by the kitchen. I could be wrong.
or it could possibly be an old video he just got around to posting. Dose he say anything that would make you believe it is new? For example, did he make reference to any recent events?
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.

User avatar
Skeleton
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:37 am
Location: Thailand

Re: jimmywx11

Postby Skeleton » Fri Aug 12, 2016 2:20 pm

NYGman wrote:
Skeleton wrote:On a side note, Jimmy recently posted a video about making Cannabis coffee, I can't link to it but it looks like he is back in Castle Wyled going by the kitchen. I could be wrong.
or it could possibly be an old video he just got around to posting. Dose he say anything that would make you believe it is new? For example, did he make reference to any recent events?


Nope mate he did not, and it would be just like Jimmy to post an old video from his old kitchen. In fact you may well be correct, he does another one about vegan burgers and the products he uses are from Sainsburys (posh supermarket to those that do not know) I highly doubt he can afford to shop their these days.
When I looked up "Ninjas" in Thesaurus.com, it said "Ninja's can't be found" Well played Ninjas, well played. :lol: :lol:

Ronnie J
Gunners Mate
 Gunners Mate
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:27 pm

Re: jimmywx11

Postby Ronnie J » Fri Aug 12, 2016 6:06 pm

Ah bless

Jimmy was so pleased with his new kitchen as well. :haha:

Bankruptcy is the worst possible scenario that could have unfolded. Homeowners are particularly vulnerable to Council bankruptcy proceedings. A relatively small debt such as Jimmy's can run into tens of thousands of pounds by the time that the process is complete.

In 2013, a verdict in an inquest delivered that the suicide of a council tax debtor was due largely to him being bankrupted by his local council for council tax. The initial debt was £1,350 but by the end of the process, it had risen to £70,000.

I'm sure Jimmy will think this is well worth it though. He has been able to produce numerous videos on the subject, including one of him threatening and abusing an old man. Top bloke is our one cell.

User avatar
PeanutGallery
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1581
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 8:11 pm
Location: In a gallery, with Peanuts.

Re: jimmywx11

Postby PeanutGallery » Sat Aug 13, 2016 10:42 am

Ronnie J wrote:In 2013, a verdict in an inquest delivered that the suicide of a council tax debtor was due largely to him being bankrupted by his local council for council tax. The initial debt was £1,350 but by the end of the process, it had risen to £70,000.


In my view that is where enforcement can be disproportionately unfair on the debtor who may not have been given a choice in the fees incurred and to lose £70,000 on a significantly smaller debt would be devastating. Ideally there should be a capped fee system in place, although again without seeing the specific details of this case it cannot be said as to what the costs incurred would have been.
Warning may contain traces of nut

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1086
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: jimmywx11

Postby longdog » Sat Aug 13, 2016 1:26 pm

PeanutGallery wrote:In my view that is where enforcement can be disproportionately unfair on the debtor who may not have been given a choice in the fees incurred and to lose £70,000 on a significantly smaller debt would be devastating. Ideally there should be a capped fee system in place, although again without seeing the specific details of this case it cannot be said as to what the costs incurred would have been.


That's true but it's hard to have sympathy for anybody who, through their own fuckwittery, turns the costs from bad to utterly ruinous... As in this case.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

mufc1959
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
 Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 3:47 pm
Location: Manchester by day, Slaithwaite by night

Re: jimmywx11

Postby mufc1959 » Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:03 pm

"Are all athletes on drugs and there's a conspiracy to keep it quiet?" questions One-Cell, the man with a cannabis farm in his spare room.

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... 7MqwzXp5cF

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2321
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: jimmywx11

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:18 pm

mufc1959 wrote:"Are all athletes on drugs and there's a conspiracy to keep it quiet?" questions One-Cell, the man with a cannabis farm in his spare room.

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... 7MqwzXp5cF

http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2016/07/24/e ... ing-drugs/
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests