The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

Jeffrey
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 3076
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Jeffrey »

Takes 5 seconds to take a picture of the warrant with your phone and post it on Facebook.
letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by letissier14 »

Jeffrey wrote:Takes 5 seconds to take a picture of the warrant with your phone and post it on Facebook.
Don't forget they have to send it to London by courier, so the esteemed Mr Ebert can go over it and then send it back to the other forensic expert, Guy Taylor for a second opinion, which will result in it being called a fake warrant.
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
Pox
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Pox »

Bones wrote:
BlueBurmese wrote:Oh dear - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -home.html
Monika Godos, 34, of Woodthorpe, is charged with assaulting Sergeant Shipley in the execution of his duty by spitting in his face. She also denied the allegations.
I see Monika turned up with good old Micheal O'Dercia (aka the rogue male) who also lost his cases too
What case was that? I need to catch up.
Was he a schoolteacher? Have a recollection that he was.
Anything known about Monika?
wanglepin
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1215
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by wanglepin »

YiamCross wrote:Well I don't know, first they say the warrant doesn't exist and then when it's produced, they find fault with it.
You didn't really believe that this was going to be the end of it. I said earlier Ceylon in his latest interview says
is all we wanted was to see the Warrant [unicorn] and we would have come down straight away.
I said they wouldn't have even if the warrant was produced for them on the day, because they would find fault with it. They used this warrant bollocks simply as an excuse to invade and take over the property because they had absolutely no excuse for doing what they did.
And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
Hyrion
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:33 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Hyrion »

Amanda C wrote:My parents lost everything when the bailiffs took it away. We aren't rich, we're normal people.
I distinctly recall Amanda previously saying they could easily pay off the entire amount but they were fighting it on principle. So I wonder if she'd consider herself as lying to the public then or lying to the public now.

Perhaps she'd claim to be telling the truth in both instances - at that time they could afford it but the fighting has drained their resources so they can no longer afford anything.
letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by letissier14 »

Amanda C wrote: we're normal people.
No you're not normal, normal people do not behave like they do.
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by rumpelstilzchen »

wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant. :lol:
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
wanglepin
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1215
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by wanglepin »

rumpelstilzchen wrote:
wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant. :lol:
I found it strange that Crawford appeared for his own defense at court and seemed to have dropped his whole legal team O`Berka, Ebert &Taylor Forensics at Law. They will love this of course as they watch Crawford get convicted they will be able to tell him he lost because he didn't follow their advice.
letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by letissier14 »

wanglepin wrote:
rumpelstilzchen wrote:
wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant. :lol:
I found it strange that Crawford appeared for his own defense at court and seemed to have dropped his whole legal team O`Berka, Ebert &Taylor Forensics at Law. They will love this of course as they watch Crawford get convicted they will be able to tell him he lost because he didn't follow their advice.
Taylor couldn't attend as he was in court himself today up in Hereford getting his fine and community service :haha:
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
YiamCross
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1210
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:23 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by YiamCross »

rumpelstilzchen wrote:
wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant. :lol:
I think we should get our facts straight. He's a consultant in legal forensics. That's what he said and I believe him. Damned if I can be bothered to find the video but I'm sure he wouldn't have said it if it wasn't true. He's been trained, you know. Not sure if house trained counts for much in a law court though it would certainly be a very bad thing if he weren't
letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1019
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by letissier14 »

Latest on the warrant on EFOTB

Craig Crawford It's a warrant you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
Bungle
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 415
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Bungle »

letissier14 wrote:Amanda Pike‎Eviction the fraud of the bank
10 mins · Edited ·


I can confirm now though that it is a county court warrant and NOT a high court writ.
And that is what it should be Amanda because after all, it was a County Court bailiff that executed the warrant to evict your parents and NOT a High Court Enforcement Officer.

Looking forward to the next supposed 'defect'.
Last edited by Bungle on Fri Jul 31, 2015 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Amanda Pike‎ wrote:WE NOW HAVE THE UNICORN IN OUR POSSESSION. I REPEAT WE HAVE THE UNICORN......However its got no horn what so ever and is about as useful as a piece of bog roll! (Shocker) I can't currently go into it to much as we've got some things to sort out in relation to it........
Like reading it and understanding it, which in the Crawford's case will likely take some time.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

letissier14 wrote:Latest on the warrant on EFOTB

Craig warrant It's a Crawford you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
FatGambit
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:41 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by FatGambit »

wanglepin wrote:
rumpelstilzchen wrote:
wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant. :lol:
I found it strange that Crawford appeared for his own defense at court and seemed to have dropped his whole legal team O`Berka, Ebert &Taylor Forensics at Law. They will love this of course as they watch Crawford get convicted they will be able to tell him he lost because he didn't follow their advice.
It's a criminal charge, O'Bonkers, Errorbert and Trailor only specialise in civil matters.
Hyrion
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 660
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:33 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Hyrion »

letissier14 wrote:Craig Crawford It's a warrant you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
Leaves one wondering how Craig expects a warrant to be produced.

Electronic printing = anyone can do it
Manual typing = anyone can do it
Hand-Written = anyone can do it

Chiseled in granite with a laser - ok, not everyone has a laser handy, but granite can be reasonably easily acquired.

So if Craig is complaining because the warrant could be easily electronically produced and printed (and I assume by anyone) - it really leaves one wondering what form he believes an acceptable warrant would come in.
FatGambit
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:41 pm

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by FatGambit »

One written in blood?
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Bungle wrote:
letissier14 wrote:Amanda Pike‎Eviction the fraud of the bank
10 mins · Edited ·


I can confirm now though that it is a county court warrant and NOT a high court writ.
And that is what it should be Amanda because after all, it was a County Court bailiff that executed the warrant to evict your parents and NOT a High Court Enforcement Officer.
OOOH NOOOOO! It wasn't a high court order? I am so disappointed. If it had been a High Court order you could have been paying interest on the outstanding amount until settled, IIRC.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Bones »

Pox wrote:
Bones wrote:
I see Monika turned up with good old Micheal O'Dercia (aka the rogue male) who also lost his cases too
What case was that? I need to catch up.
Was he a schoolteacher? Have a recollection that he was.
Anything known about Monika?
http://roguemale.org/2013/12/06/the-chr ... -mortgage/

"The Rogue Male has been homeless for THREE years now. He is, quite reasonably, somewhat pissed off at this state of affairs."

Not the best person to be giving advice to someone about how to save their home

"26 September 1989 ~ the implied contract in every mortgage deed prior to the 1989 act no longer has legal effect, on the basis that s2 prescribes that it can only be expressed in writing, signed by both parties, with all of the fairly negotiated terms in a single document."

"The signing of the deed and the deposit of said with B&B created an implied contract for a mortgage in the future, which was void for lack of compliance with section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, as it had to be executed by both parties, in accord with the Companies Act 1985, 36A Execution of documents: England and Wales and s.27(1) of the Land Registration Act 2002."

s.2 applies to contracts and not deeds.

"26 August 2009. At the hearing at Nottingham County Court, in spite of the counter claim which included a Notarised Affidavit of Obligation (one which remains unrebutted), His Honour Judge Inglis issued a consequently VOID order for possession in favour of B&B"

"4 November 2010 ~ The house was unlawfully and violently possessed by agents of the Claimant. In breach of due process and the peace, no notice was served on the owner. The use of 21 police officers, numerous bailiffs and other assorted agents illustrate how the house was taken by way of violence and deception, with excessive force and coercion. Mr David Caress, Bailiff, failed to serve the warrant on the Defendants, Rogue Male and Lifetime Tenant, who were falsely arrested in their own home, kidnapped and imprisoned for 6 hours at Bridewell Police Station, Nottingham, before being released without charge. The actual eviction was marked by the use of excessive force, the endangering of C’s life and was unlawfully aided by the accompanying police officers, whom the Defendants have reason to believe were hired by the B&B to enforce the VOID order."

You can read the rest for yourself. All very similar to what Tom is doing and trying to argue now. Much like the rest of Tom's legal team Ceylon, Ebert, Taylor and Bernica - O'deria has no understanding or comprehension of the law.
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...

Post by Bones »

letissier14 wrote:Latest on the warrant on EFOTB

Craig Crawford It's a warrant you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
As readers of this thread Craiggie and Tommy, grow a pair and post it for everyone to see.

I already know you won't :whistle: