Re: Chrisy Morris - Parking Tickets and Bailiffs.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 1:38 pm
He can't help it, he just likes to fight. It's a psychological disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Probably had a difficult birth.
Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/
Which is a automatic privilege, so not really an achievement to be crowed about. All it means is that he's managed to fill the form in correctly and within the applicable time.exiledscouser wrote:He'll be appealing to the crown court.
True, but does he know that, doubtful, and I suspect he had help with the form.aesmith wrote:Which is a automatic privilege, so not really an achievement to be crowed about. All it means is that he's managed to fill the form in correctly and within the applicable time.exiledscouser wrote:He'll be appealing to the crown court.
Don't discount the value of being able to handle the basics. I'm working on a post of an idiot who appealed a few weeks out of time. Apparently the concept of a deadline was beyond him.aesmith wrote:Which is a automatic privilege, so not really an achievement to be crowed about. All it means is that he's managed to fill the form in correctly and within the applicable time.exiledscouser wrote:He'll be appealing to the crown court.
He hasn't been granted permission to appeal though, someone over on Freeman on the land fails contacted the court and incredibly he has been granted a full retrial by jury starting 30th November Manchester Crown Court.Burnaby49 wrote:Don't discount the value of being able to handle the basics. I'm working on a post of an idiot who appealed a few weeks out of time. Apparently the concept of a deadline was beyond him.aesmith wrote:Which is a automatic privilege, so not really an achievement to be crowed about. All it means is that he's managed to fill the form in correctly and within the applicable time.exiledscouser wrote:He'll be appealing to the crown court.
Does not make sense to me. To get a retrial he surely must have appealed and been given a retrial. I think this is just an appeal against the Magistrates Court conviction which, as has been said, is automatically at Crown Court. Also, whether he gets a jury is a doubt in my mind, I think a Magistrates Court appeal at Crown Court is heard by a judge and no jury is involved.daltontrumbno wrote:He hasn't been granted permission to appeal though, someone over on Freeman on the land fails contacted the court and incredibly he has been granted a full retrial by jury starting 30th November Manchester Crown Court.
If he appealed and the appeal was successful the conviction would be quashed. It would be the CPS who would be seeking a retrial which I doubt they would bother to do in this particular case.ArthurWankspittle wrote:Does not make sense to me. To get a retrial he surely must have appealed and been given a retrial.
Above is correct. There is no adminstrative process to set aside a conviction in mags and elect jury trial at crown. Some charges have that option at the start, but having elected mode of trial you can't discard a result you don't like. Something fishy or mistaken here...ArthurWankspittle wrote:Does not make sense to me. To get a retrial he surely must have appealed and been given a retrial. I think this is just an appeal against the Magistrates Court conviction which, as has been said, is automatically at Crown Court. Also, whether he gets a jury is a doubt in my mind, I think a Magistrates Court appeal at Crown Court is heard by a judge and no jury is involved.daltontrumbno wrote:He hasn't been granted permission to appeal though, someone over on Freeman on the land fails contacted the court and incredibly he has been granted a full retrial by jury starting 30th November Manchester Crown Court.
EDIT: some Googleing says it is a "rehearing" so not a retrial except in the minds of FMOTLs. It is heard by a Judge and two Magistrates who were not party to the previous trial.
Fortunately, I am not easily bored (or slightly drunk, maybe), and I believe you mean this paragraph.exiledscouser wrote:See paragraph 68 of Schedule 12 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 which I can't be arsed to link to because, frankly it bores me to death.
Let's hope the poor kid isn't gonna spend more of her precious learning time sitting on doorsteps of evicted families as depicted on his film-whoring Ch 4 platform 'Battling The Bailiffs'. Neither would it be a useful education to drag her off to the Odeon cinema and witness her dad stuff a Sun newspaper down the bog. And I really hope she doesn't have to watch her teacher father smearing dog poo on a bailiff's car door handle. Keep her at school Mozza, and give the poor kid a chance in life.Sorry to worry any parents out there. I'm told by worried health professionals that this is a massive problem that the schools are desperate to play down and cover up.
It is considered fashionable to self harm by some pupils (especially girls) who are known to meet up to do this. Very sad.
This was one of many reasons why I'm home educating my little girl. I can't, in good conscience put my wonderful daughter into a depressive environment where she will be stifled, or worse, unless she conforms.
It also seems to be linked to the free man/ new world order and conspiracy of everything lot. Personally I have worked in education for nearly all my life from primary up to secondary and now university level and I would never dream of home schooling any of my children. There is so much more to early years schooling and a few books from WHSmith just will not cut it.He Who Knows wrote:'This Charming Man' has decided to home educate his kid. From his FB:
Let's hope the poor kid isn't gonna spend more of her precious learning time sitting on doorsteps of evicted families as depicted on his film-whoring Ch 4 platform 'Battling The Bailiffs'. Neither would it be a useful education to drag her off to the Odeon cinema and witness her dad stuff a Sun newspaper down the bog. And I really hope she doesn't have to watch her teacher father smearing dog poo on a bailiff's car door handle. Keep her at school Mozza, and give the poor kid a chance in life.Sorry to worry any parents out there. I'm told by worried health professionals that this is a massive problem that the schools are desperate to play down and cover up.
It is considered fashionable to self harm by some pupils (especially girls) who are known to meet up to do this. Very sad.
This was one of many reasons why I'm home educating my little girl. I can't, in good conscience put my wonderful daughter into a depressive environment where she will be stifled, or worse, unless she conforms.