Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10646
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby notorial dissent » Mon Oct 02, 2017 1:50 am

Hercule Parrot wrote:
mufc1959 wrote:The Scottish Common Law Court Three blokes in a pub in Paisley have made sure a pesky mortgage company which took a property into possession can't sell it until the CEO pays off the lien registered against him. ....


The whole thing seems to be the delusional fantasy of one recently-repo'd wing-nut, John Smith - the genesis of his folly being an obsessive grievance against his former employers in the Aberdeen International Casino (yes, me neither...).

https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/fadada_a ... 6f0a66.pdf
https://www.change.org/p/correct-a-gami ... y-cover-up
https://m.facebook.com/john1463?fref=nf
https://mobile.twitter.com/TailsTheyLose
https://www.scottishcommonlawcourt.com/ ... h-v-others

With the possible exception of one "case", the Scottish Common Law Court appears to comprise John Smith and his unnamed/imaginary friends voting that all of John Smith's grievances are righteous. Maybe next time they'll declare him to be the King of Perthshire, or order the BBC to hire him as a quiz show presenter. Anything is possible, when you have your own Court.... :haha:

Isn't that what imaginary friends and imaginary pretend courts are for?
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:14 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby aesmith » Mon Oct 02, 2017 2:21 pm

Hercule Parrot wrote:The whole thing seems to be the delusional fantasy of one recently-repo'd wing-nut, John Smith - the genesis of his folly being an obsessive grievance against his former employers in the Aberdeen International Casino (yes, me neither...).

So far as I can see he fell out with his employer, resigned, then tried unsuccessfully to claim constructive dismissal. Moved on to trying to bugger up their licence renewal and as a result had expenses awarded against him to the tune of £3024.35 in 2005. What's not clear is how he managed to string this out for another 10 years or how it resulted in him losing his home.

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1036
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby SteveUK » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:16 pm

it didnt take goodfers long to realise that the passing of Tom Petty is dodgy.

Post by toolapcblack Today at 1:55 pm

What does everyone think about the alleged death of Tom Petty, has he really shuffled off this mortal coil?
As I haven't found any good videos about Tom Petty I just looked him up on Wikipedia to get some dates and there could be something fishy going on;
died at age 66
born on 20th of October died on the 2nd of October, 20+2 =22
died 18 days before the 20th,18=6+6+6
date of death = 2/10/2017 (2+10)+(2+1+7) = 22
years active 47 = 11

THOMAS PETTY =45=9=33 in Pythagorean numerology
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1035
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby TheNewSaint » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:54 pm

Well, if you can believe that 45=9=33, it's not hard to make the other pieces fit. :snicker:

Also, I'm amused that they used parentheses in an addition problem.

rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2165
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby rumpelstilzchen » Wed Oct 04, 2017 6:09 pm

died at age 66,
....66.....6+6=12.....1+2=3
born on 20th of October died on the 2nd of October, 20+2 =22
....22.... 2+2=4
died 18 days before the 20th,18=6+6+6
Er, aren't we supposed to be adding?.....18...1+8=9
date of death = 2/10/2017 (2+10)+(2+1+7) = 22
....22.....2+2=1
years active 47 = 11
....11....1+1=2
So add them all up.......3+4+9+1+2= 19.....1+9=10......1+0=........ 1
Aha!
Proof!!!!1!!!!

I suspect......Colon......in the dungeon.......using the whip.......
Last edited by rumpelstilzchen on Wed Oct 04, 2017 6:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.

User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1597
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby NYGman » Wed Oct 04, 2017 6:40 pm

Adding numbers together to prove something, only proves you can add. you can also add, subtract, divide, multiply these numbers, and get completely different results. The fact that they are looking for specific patterns, may dictate their tortured math.
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1035
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby TheNewSaint » Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:31 pm

What diseased mind would find a conspiracy in the death of an apolitical 66-year-old rocker? Even worse, are they suggesting that someone as fiercely independent as Tom Petty would willingly participate in such a thing? That's a bigger mental defect than all their silly math.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Hercule Parrot » Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:19 pm

TheNewSaint wrote:What diseased mind would find a conspiracy in the death of an apolitical 66-year-old rocker? Even worse, are they suggesting that someone as fiercely independent as Tom Petty would willingly participate in such a thing? That's a bigger mental defect than all their silly math.


Who knows why he willingly participated in the Las Vegas NWO black helicopter false flag crisis actor staged incident? Perhaps they threatened to reveal his role in Pizzagate. However it's clear in any analysis that Tom Petty couldn't be allowed to tell the world what he knew, and they murdered him. Probably with little Rosa Kleb stabby shoes.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.

User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 6591
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:48 am
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby The Observer » Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:23 am

TheNewSaint wrote:Also, I'm amused that they used parentheses in an addition problem.


But there were division symbols as well:

2/10/2017


So 2 divided by 10 divided by 2017 = some impossibly small number that has no remarkable significance.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff

houseoflard
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 12:02 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby houseoflard » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:27 pm

May I present Mark of the Family Quaile, a former paratrooper with possibly one too many drops on the head.

Background concerns his tenancy of a farmhouse with some land attached. He holds under an Assured Shorthold Tenancy which can be terminated in 2 months under the S.21 procedure. The land is being redeveloped and notice to end the tenancy was served. Some pipework had to be laid and Mark refused to allow access. That much is clear from a 2016 newspaper report:

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1324388887683811&set=a.145388485583863.26399.100003381372108&type=3&theater

Following the eviction order, Mark and family refused to leave and were taken to court. Mark then went full-blown Freeman and dragged the process out for some months. The most recent court appearance is summarised in Mark's own words:

For the attention of the Court Manager/District Judge Bull
Coventry County Court
Much Park Street
Coventry
CV1 2SN
Dear Sir/Madam,
C00NU351

Simon Bull acting as District Judge Bull’s corruption was witnessed by three live witnesses. District Judge Bull’s unlawful Approved Judgment is void, it is a nullity. No jurisdiction, no contract, no case.

When District Judge Bulls jurisdiction was challenged, District Judge Bull failed to prove jurisdiction. The unlawful hearing cannot be finalised until the question of jurisdiction is established.

Please find attached, District Judge Bull’s unlawful Offer which has been refused, due to lack of jurisdiction and District Judge Bull falsifying evidence.

District Judge Bull has no authority. What system of law is District Judge Bull operating from? Is District Judge Bull implying by his actions that we are your slaves?

Why has District Judge Bull failed to sign his Approved Judgment? District Judge Bull is a liar. We have three witnesses and tape recordings to prove District Judge Bull has lied.

We motion the court to answer the question of jurisdiction as set out in our letter sent by Special Delivery, dated 6 September 2017, for the attention of District Judge Bull. A copy is attached. Until the question of jurisdiction is established, nothing can be finalised.

The live witnesses saw District Judge Bull stand up, bow to the Court and leave the Court toom. District Judge Bull abandoned ship. We stated “Man overboard. The judge has abandoned the court room. The court has been abandoned for and on the record. We now claim sovereign as highest ruling authority. We discharge the case between mark and liza. Case dismissed”. Please read below:-

1. On 13 September 2017 at 14.10pm we were shown to the Court room and stood in the doorway to the Court. We stated “Sir, we have entered this vessel under common law jurisdiction with all of our God inalienable rights in tact whilst not entering into any contract, revealed or unrevealed. Do we have an accord? District Judge Bull answered “No”.

2. We did not enter the Court room and stated, “It is our lawful right to establish jurisdiction”. Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven. District Judge Bull answered, “You have no lawful rights”.

3. We asked District Judge Bull for the proof by way of the transcript of the hearing on 28 April 2017 at 10am in District Judge Bull Chambers, “closed door justice”. District Judge Bull failed to provide the transcript which proves that he lied in his draft Judgment of 31 May 2017 in which he stated that he had 200 shares in AVIVA. In his draft Judgment, he stated that he told us he has £200,000 worth of shares in AVIVA. District Judge Bull has an imputed bias interest in the Claimants case and has protected their interest throughout the case and struck out our Counterclaim and redrafted Counterclaim.

4. District Judge Bull stated, “come in mark and liza and sit down, that is all you have to do”. We stated that we would not enter his Admiralty Court. District Judge Bull continued to try to persuade us to enter his jurisdiction. We again stated that we would not enter his court room and we did not recognise his jurisdiction. District Judge Bull instructed the Court Clerk to close the door to the court room on us, and stated that he would continue with the case. We stated that he had no lawful right to close the door. District Judge Bull shouted at me and I answered, “don’t you shout at me”. We stated, “you have no dominion over us, we are all equal in law”

5. District Judge Bull stated that unless we stopped this nonsense right away, he would have to go to the next level. We asked what that was. District Judge Bull stated, “I will have you for contempt of court”. We stated, “Sir, is that civil or criminal contempt?”

6. District Judge Bull stood up, bowed and left the court room without speaking.

7. We stated, “Man overboard, the Judge has abandoned ship”. “The Court has been abandoned, for and on the record. We now claim sovereign as highest ruling authority. We discharge the case against mark and liza. The case is dismissed.

8. At this point we left the entrance to the court room with our three live witnesses after recording the corruption by District Judge Bull and went and sat outside the court room.

9. District Judge Bull stated in his Judgment of 14 July 2017 that “AND UPON the Court hearing from Counsel for the Claimants and the Defendants attending court in person but declining to come through the court doors and leaving the building during a short adjournment offered to them for them to consider their position and the court thereafter proceeding in their absence.

10. District Judge Bull is a liar and cannot proceed once jurisdiction has been challenged. The court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits after the case has been dismissed. As jurisdiction doesn’t exist, District Judge Bull cannot justify judgment. A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is a nullity. A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. The court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted. Once jurisdiction is challenged (which it was prior to the hearing on 13 September 2017) jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist. The court must prove jurisdiction. A universal principle as old as the law is that a proceeding of a court without jurisdiction are a nullity and its judgment therein without effect on person or property. Jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear is void. A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction.

11. District Judge Bull failed to sign in wet ink his Approved Judgment. The Approved Judgment is void. It is a nullity.
We will not be tricked by the legal system, by using our called name as a trick by association with apparently-identical legal NAME.

We do not consent and are not in agreement (in writing) or implicitly (by our actions), or a trick (essentially a fraudulent inducement to contract).

We were denied our application on 26 April 2017 for an Article 6: Right to a Fair Trial by Simon Bull acting as District Judge Bull who states that he did not know what we wanted. We have the lawful right to face our accusers in a Court of Law, a Court of Record, heard by a jury with Common Law Jurisdiction.

Yours faithfully,
mark and liza


Having now apparently accepted his fate, Mark wants £10k to buy a static caravan:

https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/markofhefamily-quailequacks

There's also a couple of YouTube vids on his FB page, which I haven't watched.

https://www.facebook.com/mark.quaile.7

Footloose52
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:03 pm
Location: On a train

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Footloose52 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:45 pm

Interesting - seems that there have been legitimate times for Mark Quaile too - https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... 5/officers

Mind you he really does seem to have an axe to grind these days, a general hatred for large business seems to come thorugh very strongly.

It seems that there is some involvement with a property company (Urban and Civic), the investment arm of an insurer (Aviva Investors) and, no less, the government in the redevelopment of the former RadioStation Rugby site. U&C and AI are joint owners of the site.

The site itself is of some signifcant history over the years but is now redundant and being redeveloped as brownfield land it seems.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Hercule Parrot » Sat Oct 07, 2017 12:01 am

houseoflard wrote:There's also a couple of YouTube vids on his FB page, which I haven't watched.

https://www.facebook.com/mark.quaile.7


You haven't missed much, it's a sad and confusing tale, presented in a baffling ramble to camera. Mr Quaile appears to be ill-equipped to deal with civilian life. Upon retiring from the armed forces he came up with some grand idea of starting a charity for veterans (as if there wasn't ample provision from established national charities). This doesn't seem to have gone beyond registering the domain operationrecovery.co.uk.

As far as I can tell Quail & his meek missus obtained a tenancy for a dilapidated farmhouse, which they intended to refurbish as their family home and headquarters. I assume they didn't take professional advice, because they were later surprised to discover that this was a dodgy sub-letting arrangement and they didn't actually have any rights of occupancy. The land and buildings were already owned by a group of property developers (mentioned by footloose in the post above) who had substantial plans for the site (http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/l ... w-11651151).

Quaile and his partner wanted the property developers to recognise them as legitimate tenants and carry out extensive refurbishments to the farmhouse so they could continue to live there. The property developers initially entertained this possibility, but negotiations ran onto the rocks. Quaile wanted the developers to recognise and honour various promises which he believed he had been given by others during the dodgy sub-letting period. Unfortunately he overplayed his hand, and the developers decided it was more trouble than it was worth.

And so we arrive in the courts. Quaile believed that along the way he had established some kind of enforceable tenancy which the developers were obliged to recognise. The developers believed he had no such thing, and could therefore be turfed off the site. Quaile abandoned professional representation and pursued a template FMOTL approach, with predictable results.

It's a sad situation. Quaile doesn't seem to be a dishonest sort of chap, just not very bright. The third youtube video descends into a baffling ramble about promises which were supposedly made and broken by a confusing swarm of lawyers and agents, accusations of corruption and freemasonry, shadowy censorship of local media, fraud and broken cookers. The local MP is bent because he won't help, the judge is bent because he ruled against them, etc.

Quaile can't get his head round the possibility that he has sunk his family's life savings into a wild goose chase. He is in frantic denial, and his mousy missus is loyally trotting alongside. It is painful to watch him blundering around, failing to understand his situation. The third youtube video includes a 20 minute complaint because he wasn't allowed to claim against the developer's insurance. He seems to believe that if he makes a list of grievances and losses, they should just send him a cheque.

I'm going to have to stop, it's going on for hours without any coherent narrative or structure.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Hercule Parrot » Sat Oct 07, 2017 11:41 am

Some of you will have already seen this, but there's a great sub-topic on Reddit called "Am I Being Detained?" collating examples of sovcit foolishness. If you enjoy the schadenfreude aspect as I do, this is a rewarding visit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/amibeingdetained/

Today's gem : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGFOLKoM44E
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.

doublelong
First Mate
First Mate
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 2:46 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby doublelong » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:43 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTkuOhEJyuM NSFW folks contains lots of naughty words
Clamp proofing your van the free man way :haha:

His comment at the end though just shows what an arsehole he really is

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2664
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:46 pm

doublelong wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTkuOhEJyuM
Clamp proofing your van the free man way :haha:

His comment at the end though just shows what an arsehole he really is
NSFW folks.
He has one comment on that video which is completely wrong for this situation. :haha: and the "chains" he has used look like poundland jobs which you could probably cut through with scissors. I look forward to more updates but the other video of his I checked never showed the outcome - I wonder if there is a reason for that?
Edit to add the bit in red and this:
Bailiffs can clamp or immobilise his vehicle. If I were a bailiff I'd just lock a clamp and chain around say the back axle such that driving it would trash the van and the road. Leave the necessary notices etc and then start negotiating.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 3501
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:02 am
Contact:

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby grixit » Sat Oct 14, 2017 3:00 am

jack up the back of the van, slide the boot under, then drop it so the wheel goes into the boot. lock it up, chains and all. Your move, free man.
I voted for Hillary, and i didn't even get a stupid tshirt!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4

mufc1959
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2015 3:47 pm
Location: Manchester by day, Slaithwaite by night

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby mufc1959 » Sun Oct 15, 2017 3:28 pm

It's coming up to that time of year, and so if you're looking for the perfect holiday gift for the Freetard in your life, you couldn't do any better than this. Not only do these flipflops pay tribute to the contents of his roll-up, when he crosses his legs, a secret he's been trying to keep is unwittingly disclosed ...
Image

fortinbras
Princeps Wooloosia
Posts: 2970
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:50 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby fortinbras » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:06 pm

doublelong wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTkuOhEJyuM NSFW folks contains lots of naughty words
Clamp proofing your van the free man way :haha:
His comment at the end though just shows what an arsehole he really is


Here's an example of an American SovTard (that's what I call them), making his own video - and I suppose he, himself, posted it - showing what a total asshole he was.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knwdHI35J2I
He is legally obligated to show his driver's license and vehicle registration to police in every State (and, in most States, also proof of insurance) ... but instead he refuses by inventing out of his imagination a bogus requirement that the police have to follow (no such requirement anywhere). The ratty ceiling of his car sort of detracts from his persuasiveness. I would assume his thick Southern accent will require British viewers to play this video slowly. His repeated barking at the police "This is how we're going to do it" becomes very tedious (to the police) very quickly. After several minutes of this nonsense, including his refusal to step out of the car to be arrested for non-production of his license (or unlicensed driving), the police smash his side windows (plural, this is uncommon, but he may have been making the sort of furtive movements that suggested he was reaching for a gun - or at least the police would say that after putting up for so long with his insulting behavior) - a very expensive lesson in manners for him.

The Seventh String
Gunners Mate
Gunners Mate
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:48 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby The Seventh String » Thu Oct 19, 2017 1:52 am

No problems with anyone’s accent. We get to hear a lot of the various US accents these days courtesy of TV, films and music. :)

Not sure it works the same the other way though - years ago I found myself having to convince a Louisiana police officer that yes, the reason I speak the way I do really is because I’m an English person from England and no, we don’t all sound like Hugh Grant, Sean Connery (who isn’t even English) or the Queen, we have regional accents too.

In England, at least, a police constable is expected to show you their warrant (ID) and give you their name and “collar number” if you ask. Anyone can put on a police uniform, after all....

The stupidest thing about that traveller driver is he must have known the way it would go from the start. He knows to avoid that sort of thing happening he needs a driving licence and what will happen if he hasn’t got one. If he genuinely thinks the law doesn’t require him to have a licence then that’s a matter to take up with the court because the only possible outcome of arguing with the police like that is going to be a damaged vehicle and being arrested. So he may as well co-operate and save himself the damage to the vehicle.

Self-preservation, minimising bad consequences and avoiding shooting yourself in the foot just isn’t part of the sovrun make-up I guess.

User avatar
eric
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 577
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:44 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby eric » Thu Oct 19, 2017 3:00 am

Self-preservation, minimising bad consequences and avoiding shooting yourself in the foot just isn’t part of the sovrun make-up I guess.

Perhaps if buddy wishes to avoid interaction with the police he shouldn't be driving a vehicle that is a danger to himself and everyone else on the road. If you review the whole video and read the comments here is a list of his chariot's issues:
1. bald tires and the police had problems measuring tread depth indicating alignment issues;
2. cracked windshield obscuring driver's vision;
3. no windshield wipers at all;
4. headliner separation like he has is a good indicator that his vehicle has sat out in the back of a field for a couple of years, probably because the owner is waiting for the price of scrap to rise enough to get rid of that hunk of rusting metal.


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Bot], Google [Bot], Linkdex [Bot] and 1 guest