Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10755
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby notorial dissent » Fri May 12, 2017 12:40 am

letissier14 wrote:Image

They said McKenzie, is ‘a self-proclaimed Freeman-on-the-Land’, who declared himself ‘independent of government jurisdiction and holds the archaic belief that all statute law is contractual and therefore only applicable if an individual consents to it’.

Image

Archaic??? I'm wondering where they come up with that one. Anarchic perhaps, but that is a bit esoteric for most modern journalists?? to manage. Since that isn't/wasn't a medieval concept, they took contracts rather more seriously then I think than they do now, they often went to war over failure to abide. So I really wonder where they came up with that one.

He should be made to sit through this dialogue, it is pun-ishing enough, except maybe it is cruel and inhuman pun-ishment. :snicker:
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2179
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby rumpelstilzchen » Fri May 12, 2017 12:52 am

notorial dissent wrote:
He should be made to sit through this dialogue, it is pun-ishing enough, except maybe it is cruel and inhuman pun-ishment. :snicker:

I agree. He thought he was being clef-er but his argument was off-key and it fell flat. It was bound to lead to treble.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.

Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 570
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Chaos » Fri May 12, 2017 2:22 am

rumpelstilzchen wrote:
notorial dissent wrote:
He should be made to sit through this dialogue, it is pun-ishing enough, except maybe it is cruel and inhuman pun-ishment. :snicker:

I agree. He thought he was being clef-er but his argument was off-key and it fell flat. It was bound to lead to treble.



you'll note that's what happens when you pitch the same song and dance. though minor, one is bound to fall flat after sliding down the scale.

User avatar
bmxninja357
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1017
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 7:46 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby bmxninja357 » Fri May 12, 2017 2:33 am

Like the rest of them its the same old song and dance.
whoever said laughter is the best medicine never had gonorrhea....

User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 3526
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:02 am
Contact:

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby grixit » Fri May 12, 2017 5:25 am

I have no symphony for him. He brought this cacophony on himself. This is how you end up doing an interval behind bars.
I voted for Hillary, and i didn't even get a stupid tshirt!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4

User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 6643
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:48 am
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby The Observer » Fri May 12, 2017 3:16 pm

And how tragic that this went from a prelude of harmony to his self-composed coda of defeat.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff

letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 4:02 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby letissier14 » Tue May 16, 2017 3:12 pm

Oh dear
Image

Rekha Patel shared a post to Baron David Ward's Timeline.
12 May at 05:21 ·

‎Alan Dransfield‎ to The Common Law Court Of Wales
10 May at 05:47 ·
COMPLAINT AGAINST THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF CHESHIRE MR SIMON BYRNE

National Police Chiefs Council
1st Floor, 10 Victoria Street
London
SW1H 0NN

Dear Sirs
I wish to make a formal complaint against the Chief Constable of Cheshire Mr Simon Byrne.
Over the past 2/3 years, I have had recourse to complain about the Unlawful Conduct of the Information Commissioner's Office which is based in Cheshire under the remit of Simon Byrne.
There is prima faice evidence that the Cheshire Police Chief Constable has turned a wilful blind eye to the unlawful activities by the ICO.

In particulrar the unlawful breaches of section 77 of the FOIA 2000 and the wrongful use and abuse of section 14/1 Vexatious Exemptions.

In particular, please read the GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield V ICO Upper Tribunal decsion. This Court Precedent was reached under BAD LAW and has now been used approx 6500 times since Jan 2013 to deny UK Citizens Civil and Human Rights.
These 6500 unlawful decisions can be found on the ICO web site. I have also complained to Mr Byrne that the ICO Officials are guilty of fraud and theft of public funds by deception, failures to provide expenses receipts,failure to keep proper records etc.

In a nutshell, the ICO Current Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham and the previous IC Mr Christopher Graham.are fraudsters,cheats and liars.

No withstanding the veracity of my allegations, it behooves the NPCC to investigate my assertions solely on the gravity.Numerous ICO Senior Officials are conniving and colluding with HM Judges and other Senior Government Official solely to pervert the course of Justice on Vexatious Malfeasance.

I call for a full forensic investigation into the use and abuse of GIA/3037/2011 Dransfield V ICO. In a nutshell, the GIA /3037/2011 Decision was designed by crooks to protect crooks and to protect heinous crimes, paedophilia, fraud and theft of public funds, rape, sex crimes etc.

With thanks

Yours sincerely

Alan M Dransfield
FOIA Campaigner and Social Watchdog.
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions

John Uskglass
Scalawag
Scalawag
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby John Uskglass » Tue May 16, 2017 3:42 pm

More, much more in the same vein...
http://blog.olliesemporium.co.uk/#home

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10755
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby notorial dissent » Tue May 16, 2017 4:30 pm

Other than that Dransfield seems to have a major knickers twist about the Cheshire ICO office, this doesn't really make much sense. I will assume he is another of the FOIA abusers who didn't get the answers he wanted and is all put out about it.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

rosy
Pirates Mate
Pirates Mate
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 1:41 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby rosy » Tue May 16, 2017 5:04 pm

There is an Alan M Dransfield who has been banned from Whatdotheyknow for "continued breaches of our annotation policy after a warning".

His 421 FOIA requests are wide and varied, and I don't have the time or the energy to look through them all right now. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/ala ... pen?page=1

John Uskglass
Scalawag
Scalawag
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby John Uskglass » Wed May 17, 2017 12:43 pm

Mr Dransfield has the dubious honour of having been a test case in determining what counts as a 'vexatious' FOI request.
https://panopticonblog.com/2013/02/07/v ... -tribunal/
Spoiler - he lost.
And lost again at the Appeal Court
http://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/ ... st-stories

And the vital matter that was at stake? Lightning protection arrangements on a pedestrian foot bridge!

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1148
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby AndyPandy » Wed May 17, 2017 1:09 pm

https://www.facebook.com/politicalbible ... 42/?type=3

I guess this could apply to the majority of Sov Cits !!

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10755
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby notorial dissent » Wed May 17, 2017 1:20 pm

We have a descriptive term for that. CRANK.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1484
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Hercule Parrot » Thu May 18, 2017 6:37 am

AndyPandy wrote:https://www.facebook.com/politicalbible/photos/a.378264662363613.1073741829.375365662653513/666419676881442/?type=3

I guess this could apply to the majority of Sov Cits !!


Politics is off-topic at Q, Andy.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.

aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 413
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:14 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby aesmith » Thu May 18, 2017 7:49 pm

Another Council Tax win coming up. Wonder if he'll get Ollie Pinnock to assist him ..
GOODFY wrote:
COUNCIL TAX HAVE BEEN SUMMONED TO COURT
dave42 » 18 May 2017 17:19
Hi to old friends and new ,its been a while since i was last on.
I,m hopeing that someone could advise me on the situation im in now. A letter arrived today letting me no when im due in court for non payment of council tax ,I never payed half of last years but they sold that on to some debt company and no contact = no contract F**KEM.
The council has now realized i wont pay so they have decided to take me straight to court, but upon reading the letter it advises me to inform them if i will be attending.............? OF COURSE I F**KING AM.........anyway theyve asked me to inform them as they will have to arrange another court date as this date they have gave me .....is not convenient for THEM ????????
Any advice on how to play this one will be much appreciated..... Facts figures or any thing i can use in my defence against these corrupt F...... are well you no what i mean

Thanks Dave42

There was another Council Tax one running on Goofy as well, poster by the name of Fodder. Nothing seemed to come of that so I assume he's either paid or is in prison.

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2747
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Thu May 18, 2017 9:29 pm

aesmith wrote:There was another Council Tax one running on Goofy as well, poster by the name of Fodder. Nothing seemed to come of that so I assume he's either paid or is in prison.
Or his mum paid it and stopped him playing on the internet.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1108
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby SteveUK » Fri May 19, 2017 11:57 am

I thought our friend Tom Boyce (etfob) crew had been quiet recently.

Well

Arrested and dragged to Crown Court today (all day) for non-appearance. Judge wouldn't let me submit papers to prove who I was NOT. Asked me what name I would like to be called. "Tom of Cheshire". That was entered on the record aka Thomas Boyce. "Objection Sir! Did you not get my notice of Corporation?" He said "Yes I have seen that". "Well that proves I am not he". All he said was "hmmm". I replied "I am a living man, you are all dead entities and you cannot hear me. Where is the proof of claim?" "There is no claimant in criminal matters" said the Judge. "If there is no claimant then there is no case to answer to". He then told me to stand. I asked him "IS that an order or request" He said it an order and threatened me with contempt of Court. "Excuse me Sir. Who's name has just been called urs or mine. I sure it was mine, which makes it MY court. Now you shut up and I will shut up and we will both be ok, unless you have some authority over me. "I do" he said. "Produce it now then and produce your public oath and your bond of security in case I am damaged". He said "I do not have to". I said "your a public servant and this is a public record" Ignored me for 5 minutes. Usher said would you please stand, it is a request. I did and case adjourned until 24th July for a trial. To me that is a result. Not remanded,no tag. Losing the fear, every day. Waiting on my official paper-work now and we start again.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10755
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby notorial dissent » Fri May 19, 2017 12:41 pm

OK, "notice of Corporation" which translated from the idjit means what?? Just out of curiosity, are UK judges required to be bonded??
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1789
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby longdog » Fri May 19, 2017 12:57 pm

notorial dissent wrote:Just out of curiosity, are UK judges required to be bonded??


Judges in the UK have judicial immunity for their acts as a judge and therefore there would be no need for a bond as they can't be sued. This 'I demand to see your bond' crap is just another one of their mantras with no basis in reality presumably either imported from the US or specially crafted from raw bullshit.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10755
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby notorial dissent » Fri May 19, 2017 1:32 pm

OK, it's imported from the US then. Certain types of bonds are required for elected officials in some instances for specific reasons, and not the ones the sovicts think. I figured that was what it was, but wanted to be sure.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests