Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2408
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:25 am

Hercule Parrot wrote:So basically he refused to give his details, and they lawfully arrested him. He then bottled and gave his details, so they de-arrested him on the street (to avoid the hassle of booking him through custody).
Alternatively one cop realised who he was because they know him already. "Oh no you've got Crazy Davey there. Don't bother arresting him and bringing him back to the station because he will go off on a 20 minute rant to every question you ask him and it will take you 6 hours to process him."
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2408
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:34 am

rumpelstilzchen wrote:I will make a prediction:
"No injured party, no evidence only hearsay and no signature"........
Outcome. Six points and a two hundred pounds fine. If he decides to go to court the fine will be greater and he will be stung for costs.
Success!!!!1!!!!
He wasn't stopped by the Police, just spotted by a co-worker. As he's only just started work there he will have little employment protection in law.
For those of you not up to speed with what is going on, the laws on using mobile phones (cells) were revised from the 1st of this month. There have been lots of explanation and clarification type articles and discussions with the Police, even Q&A over Twitter with the Police. My reading of what he was doing is that he would have broke the law and would have been prosecuted if spotted by the Police.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1962
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby rumpelstilzchen » Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:36 am

ArthurWankspittle wrote:He wasn't stopped by the Police

According to this: viewtopic.php?p=242013#p242013 he was.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2408
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:50 pm

rumpelstilzchen wrote:
ArthurWankspittle wrote:He wasn't stopped by the Police

According to this: viewtopic.php?p=242013#p242013 he was.
My apologies. I'd forgotten this post and was thinking of the one that said a colleague had told his boss. Which also might be true in an additional way. Either way he's likely to get 6 points, £200 fine and no unemployment benefit for several weeks. At least he won't have to pay the fine in a lump sum if he's on the dole, he can ask for it to be taken from his benefit at £5 a week or whatever the current rate is.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

aesmith
Pirate Captain
Pirate Captain
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:14 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby aesmith » Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:09 am

To be fair, fairer than he deserves, the UK law prohibiting use of mobile phones while driving scored a massive own goal by failing to define either "using" or "driving". Hence a lot of hearsay about whether you need to switch the engine off when parked, or whether using the phone as a sat nav or dictaphone counts. In practice the police are inclined to treat even handling the phone as "using".

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 718
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby SteveUK » Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:32 pm

all kicking off in Milton Keynes as we speak......from ETFOTB

Image

:beatinghorse:
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

aesmith
Pirate Captain
Pirate Captain
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:14 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby aesmith » Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:49 pm

This myth that council tax Liability Orders aren't "real" seems to live on.

littleFred
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1334
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby littleFred » Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:12 pm

The freetards haven't grasped the fact that if a court orders them to do something and they don't do it, there are generally consequences. They can kick and scream as much as they want, claiming the court was wrong or fraudulent or corrupt or whatever, but it won't stop the consequences.

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2408
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:13 pm

aesmith wrote:This myth that council tax Liability Orders aren't "real" seems to live on.
Along with someone who once stopped in the house is classed as "vulnerable" therefore the bailiff should back off.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 479
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Chaos » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:11 am

what he's doing to his mother, if that is even true, is truly a douche move.

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby longdog » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:15 am

littleFred wrote:The freetards haven't grasped the fact that if a court orders them to do something and they don't do it, there are generally consequences. They can kick and scream as much as they want, claiming the court was wrong or fraudulent or corrupt or whatever, but it won't stop the consequences.


It makes you wonder what they would rather have than courts making decisions in a more or less free and open way. Would they rather have the St Trinians principle of "Might is always right"? Toss a coin and the loser pays? A free-for-all where nobody ever pays anybody anything including wages, debts and state benefits?

Useless, self-centred, miserly fuckers the lot of them.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

littleFred
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1334
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby littleFred » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:58 am

GOOFies have always been fond of "I'm terrible at paying debts and the lender didn't check this so they were irresponsible so I don't need to pay it back."

But Tiggy has a new twist. "I committed fraud to get this loan and the lender didn't notice so I don't have to pay it back."

GOOFy Replenish lied to get a loan, saying he was employed when he wasn't. He's not sure if this will work.
Replenish wrote:Would this work against me or possibly actually work in my favour given they didn't check my employment status?

Well, that's covered by Fraud Act 2006: dishonestly making a false representation intending to make a temporary gain.

But apparently it's the lender's fault for not noticing the fraud:
Tiggy wrote:They should have checked and refused you the loans.

I'd love to see Replenish's complaint, or defence at court: "I confess to fraud."

rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1962
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby rumpelstilzchen » Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:24 am

littleFred wrote:I'd love to see Replenish's complaint, or defence at court: "I confess to fraud."

:haha: :haha: :haha:
I love it!
"Your honour, I lied through my teeth and they were taken in by my lies. So they are the ones at fault"
:beatinghorse:
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 718
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby SteveUK » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:07 am

oddly, he could well get away with it and go for interest and charges back plus 8% interest. I wont say who I work for, but we write about 10,000 small loans per month. We often get hammered by the FOS even where people have lied on application, and admitted it. We are bound to do proper checks and not just take the info at face value. Now for example, we test applications against ONS data to shore up the process(amongst other things). The wild west days are over.

I kind of see the logic it in. The desperate will fib when their backs against the wall and as lenders, we are bound to verify that info.IT also gives free loaders a potential free ticket though.

Naturally, they'll always owe the principle though.

Strange times we live in.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

littleFred
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1334
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby littleFred » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:19 pm

oddly, he could well get away with it and go for interest and charges back plus 8% interest.

Wouldn't they still be liable for the high interest rate they signed up to, up to the time of the default?

Anyhow, this suggests another escape route for GOOFies. They might take out a loan in an honest way, but later claim to have lied on the application form.

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby longdog » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:26 pm

littleFred wrote:Anyhow, this suggests another escape route for GOOFies. They might take out a loan in an honest way, but later claim to have lied on the application form.


And yet they will still claim to be the party acting 'in honour' and 'without ill-will or vexation'. :shrug:
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1382
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Brea, CA

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Arthur Rubin » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:31 pm

littleFred wrote:But Tiggy has a new twist. "I committed fraud to get this loan and the lender didn't notice so I don't have to pay it back."
Reminds me of a bankruptcy case where I was a creditor. Wells Fargo Bank, the class 3A creditor, issued them a loan. The debtor's CFO claimed the application wasn't fraudulent because no one should have believed it, which might have dismissed the claim for loan repayment.
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 718
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby SteveUK » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:22 pm

littleFred wrote:
oddly, he could well get away with it and go for interest and charges back plus 8% interest.

Wouldn't they still be liable for the high interest rate they signed up to, up to the time of the default?

Anyhow, this suggests another escape route for GOOFies. They might take out a loan in an honest way, but later claim to have lied on the application form.


No, not a cent. Plus we have to pay them 8% on Amy interest they did pay. Plus the £500 for getting dragged to FOS in the first place
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4050
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Contact:

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby Gregg » Thu Mar 16, 2017 1:58 pm

Chaos wrote:what he's doing to his mother, if that is even true, is truly a douche move.


Roll the old bag out and put her in the back seat! It only works if she's IN the car!
:haha:
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
We have renamed the Eastern Front Well Armed Bunker in Gettysburg, now called simply "Der Dachshundbünker" or "das Dachshund Lair"

doublelong
Pirates Mate
Pirates Mate
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 2:46 pm

Re: Random Freemanesque Babblings from idiots unable to sustain their own thread

Postby doublelong » Thu Mar 16, 2017 2:44 pm

https://youtu.be/n1ZsAF9bruM?t=7m15s
Bailiff’s response to wet ink signatures :haha:


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests