Quatloos!

Yup same old story. The thing is when you say to these people "Show me one instance where this has worked" and they just start quoting youtube videos of people who have told them it has worked, who again cannot show any proof of it actually working.

Its self perpetuating lie that has no beginning and no end.

There is literally no arguing with these people, they believe what they believe and even when they are staring at the facts in black and white, they still do not change. Tom Crawford being the prime example.

I enjoyed the bailiff's text response at the end:

I think you will find our Liability Order supercedes your common law nonsense. We will be attending shortly.

As often happens, the council-tax payer, a "client" of David's, might have a genuine case. Perhaps there was an admin foul-up in the council. But the payer either didn't defend the application for a liability order, or defended and lost.

So David is arguing with the wrong person.

littleFred wrote:I enjoyed the bailiff's text response at the end:

I think you will find our Liability Order supercedes your common law nonsense. We will be attending shortly.

As often happens, the council-tax payer, a "client" of David's, might have a genuine case. Perhaps there was an admin foul-up in the council. But the payer either didn't defend the application for a liability order, or defended and lost.

So David is arguing with the wrong person.

To the best of my knowledge councils don't go straight from a liability order to the bailiffs they try to make the debtor see sense and come to an arrangement first. Unfortunately these morons with their moronic ideas convince others that a liability order is nothing to worry about and they can ignore it rather than saying "OK... There's a liability order so you are going to have to start paying or things will start getting very expensive and you could end up behind bars".

littleFred wrote:I enjoyed the bailiff's text response at the end:

I think you will find our Liability Order supercedes your common law nonsense. We will be attending shortly.

As often happens, the council-tax payer, a "client" of David's, might have a genuine case. Perhaps there was an admin foul-up in the council. But the payer either didn't defend the application for a liability order, or defended and lost.

So David is arguing with the wrong person.

Yes David aka indigo child seemed a bit stumped at the end, not the outcome he was hoping for.

https://m.facebook.com/david.clapham1?fref=ts

How did this moron slip quietly without much attention?

From his Facebook page of complete freemamary, he actually believes if you say some magic words, the prosecutor will have to write you a cheque! Utter madness!!

Link to said comment- https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 0426374295

JimUk1 wrote:https://m.facebook.com/david.clapham1?fref=ts
How did this moron slip quietly without much attention?

From his Facebook page of complete freemamary, he actually believes if you say some magic words, the prosecutor will have to write you a cheque! Utter madness!!

He's just randomly pasting segments of fantasy-law from a sovcit dude in the US, circa 1991
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-n30dayZwc0wakHT9

Interesting that his FB page is drawing in all the usual crowd Hayles Owen, Baron Barrie Dickinson (BvT's pal) etc. There must be some internet equivalent to the faint scent of rotten meat which attracts flies from miles around.

Hercule Parrot wrote: There must be some internet equivalent to the faint scent of rotten meat which attracts flies from miles around.

Google search?

Arthur Rubin wrote:

Hercule Parrot wrote: There must be some internet equivalent to the faint scent of rotten meat which attracts flies from miles around.

Google search?

The late website "Ogrish" was probably a better answer.

I am indebted to the UK Evictees and Families Unite for drawing my attention to a Guardian article: New Zealand river granted same legal rights as human being.

As this relates to New Zealand, I've put more thoughts in a post under Other Countries.

another eviction looming thanks to GOODF:

Makes you wonder what the P in David P Carter stands for.
I have never seen and can't imagine a redemption statement that doesn't tell you what to do to redeem the loan.
But in your case David, the PN has to be hand delivered to the original mortgage company or its successors, in sequence. So you have to go to Birmingham for the Birmingham Midshires. Then to Edinburgh as they were taken over by Bank of Scotland. Then to Halifax as the Halifax bought BOS. Only then can you go to Lloyds in London as they merged/took over the Halifax.

Why would you risk your house and I'm assuming family's well being because some quack told you a bit of paper with some magic words on it would mean you don't have to pay your mortgage.

TheCoz wrote:Why would you risk your house and I'm assuming family's well being because some quack told you a bit of paper with some magic words on it would mean you don't have to pay your mortgage.

Greed and stupidity, and gullibility, usually.

FIFU

Hercule Parrot wrote:

TheCoz wrote:Why would you risk your house and I'm assuming family's well being because some quack told you a bit of paper with some magic words on it would mean you don't have to pay your mortgage.

Greed and stupidity, usually.

Sometimes desperation enters into it. Lose a job, and paying a mortgage can be tough; and some people grasp at the flimsiest straws in an attempt to keep themselves financially afloat.

Pottapaug1938 wrote:Sometimes desperation enters into it. Lose a job, and paying a mortgage can be tough; and some people grasp at the flimsiest straws in an attempt to keep themselves financially afloat.

True. I think we can find examples in the threads here of people who waded into the shallow end of the kool-ade pool mainly because they were trying to avoid a foreclosure or some other negative incident regarding their finances. And it doesn't take much for them to grab the life ring that the scamming sovrun guru throws at them, especially when he or she promises to save their home or income.

At least now the majority of the flat earth/chemtrails/conspiracy theorists have gone from GOODF we've been spared the 'Westminster Terror Attack False Flag' thread.

Give it another day

mufc1959 wrote:At least now the majority of the flat earth/chemtrails/conspiracy theorists have gone from GOODF we've been spared the 'Westminster Terror Attack False Flag' thread.

Not entirely. Some of the flat-earthers are ending up in the NBA.

The Observer wrote:Not entirely. Some of the flat-earthers are ending up in the NBA.

I just hope that the next time they walk out onto a basketball pitch* someone hands them a Frisbee not a ball.

*Or whatever the things are called