Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10050
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby notorial dissent » Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:23 pm

ArthurWankspittle wrote:
getoutofdebtfools wrote:I do hope some short tempered scaffolder buys Tom's house.... :lol:
I think we are past the short-tempered-builder stage by now, but the sale to a Doberman breeder would be welcome.

Not to mention entertaining. Or maybe a Rottweiler breeder.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1387
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby longdog » Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:39 pm

notorial dissent wrote:
ArthurWankspittle wrote:
getoutofdebtfools wrote:I do hope some short tempered scaffolder buys Tom's house.... :lol:
I think we are past the short-tempered-builder stage by now, but the sale to a Doberman breeder would be welcome.

Not to mention entertaining. Or maybe a Rottweiler breeder.


I've never met a stroppy Rottie, they've always been soppy great lumps. I suggest Akitas, they're a foul tempered lot :snicker:
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

exiledscouser
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:01 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby exiledscouser » Wed Mar 22, 2017 2:31 pm

So Tom announces his big breakthrough but as far as I can see it's same old same old.

What's he gonna do, get himself back before the same court he views as corrupt, seek a justice he stated he'll just be denied? I can't comprehend why he thinks this latest clutched straw will make the slightest of difference.

Meanwhile it's Grand Designs over at the former case Crawfraud as the new owner tarts it up. The place has had a facelift and Tom has wisely stayed off the roof! To my reconing it's changed hands at least twice since Betty et al were sent in their merry ways.

It's coming up to the two year anniversary now - move on Tom.

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4123
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Contact:

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby Gregg » Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:59 pm

I think we should start a GoFundMe campaign for ME to buy the house. I'll make it the UK Annex to the Very Well Armed Bunker Complex and see how old Crazy Tom and Onsie et al react when I put an elite squad of the 699th Airborne Assault Dachshund Regiment on the perimeter.

Image
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.

Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby Chaos » Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:03 pm

lol. that pic is awesome

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4123
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Contact:

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby Gregg » Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:12 pm

Crusoe the Celebrity Dachshund is kind of a thing in the USA, he has his own YouTube channel and its a shit ton better than Tom Crawford's.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz35G- ... ma2yka7G8A

Enjoy!
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.

Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby Chaos » Wed Mar 22, 2017 6:28 pm

the fake dog legs coming out of the hockey jersey holding the stick is hysterical.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10050
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby notorial dissent » Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:43 am

Actually, watching paint dry would be more entertaining than anything Clan Crawfraud could come up with.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

littleFred
Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby littleFred » Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:11 am

On ETFOTB, Amanda is repeating her anguish that the CPS, which prosecutes crimes, doesn't have paperwork relating to the civil case of the bank v Tom.

Amanda wrote:The CPS canot get them because they don't exsist.

Not so. The CPS don't have them because there is no reason why they should.

Amanda: If Tom wants paperwork relating to his civil case, he should ask the court that dealt with it. Not someone who had no connection with the case.

Perhaps Amanda thinks the CPS is all-powerful, and has the authority (and duty) to demand these documents from the civil court. It doesn't.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10050
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby notorial dissent » Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:42 am

Perhaps Amanda, just doesn't have clue one about what she is going on about, big surprise I know, and she is too stupid/lazy to actually ask someone who might know, like the actual court. It would see,m that the difference between civil and criminal court isn't within her cognizance.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

doublelong
First Mate
First Mate
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 2:46 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby doublelong » Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:51 am

So now that this thread is reaching the big 100, what is Tom’s next step? I was under the impression that he has now exhausted all avenues in the criminal case. Also the civil case has come to an end in the high court, that’s the way I have read it. So without instigating another criminal case is this the end of the line? And from now on he is reduced to showing up at talks and making the odd YouTube video on the anniversary of the eviction?

Imagine the shock over on EFOTB if he was demoted to the random thread. :haha:

rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2009
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby rumpelstilzchen » Thu Mar 23, 2017 12:05 pm

You do have to chuckle at the stupidity of the Crawfords. If I understand them correctly their argument is that because the CPS have never had a copy of the warrant it must follow that the warrant has never existed.
Now, that is freetard fuckwittery at its finest.
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.

Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby Chaos » Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:33 pm

notorial dissent wrote:Perhaps Amanda, just doesn't have clue one about what she is going on about, big surprise I know, and she is too stupid/lazy to actually ask someone who might know, like the actual court. It would see,m that the difference between civil and criminal court isn't within her cognizance.


I believe she actually does know and has, at the least, been told where to get them but continues with ruses like that with the warrant looking for sympathy. wonder where that ebert warrant analysis is by the way. it's been over a year.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10050
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby notorial dissent » Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:49 pm

So you're saying pretend stupid and cluelessness as opposed to the genuine article? Not much of a stretch one way or the other in my book.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

littleFred
Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby littleFred » Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:57 pm

I am shocked and horrified that my local library can't produce receipts for the shopping I bought last week at a supermarket. This proves beyond doubt that either (a) I didn't really go to the supermarket or (b) the library is entirely corrupt. In either case, it proves I didn't need to pay back my mortgage so I can claim it all back and keep the house.

Or, just possibly, it proves that I am clueless about libraries and supermarkets and mortgages.

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby TheNewSaint » Thu Mar 23, 2017 1:59 pm

Chaos wrote:wonder where that ebert warrant analysis is by the way. it's been over a year.


I wonder if "the warrant doesn't exist because it wasn't in the CPS case" is the Ebert warrant analysis. It sounds like an argument one of Crawfords' crack legal team would come up with. This lame argument, with no avenue for remedy, is the best anyone can do at this point.

User avatar
arayder
Banned (Temporarily)
Banned (Temporarily)
Posts: 2031
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby arayder » Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:06 pm

notorial dissent wrote:So you're saying pretend stupid and cluelessness as opposed to the genuine article? Not much of a stretch one way or the other in my book.


To some people a misleading story believed is better than the plain truth.

aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:14 am

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby aesmith » Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:11 pm

To be honest I'm surprised the CPS has been so easy going. In a criminal matter the defendant has a right to see unused prosecution material that may undermine the prosecution, or assist the defence. He doesn't have a right to demand a list of irrelevant documents, particularly ones that the CPS don't in fact hold. I wonder what the judge actually said that was interpreted by Amanda as "ordering" the CPS to magic these up.

letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 847
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 4:02 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby letissier14 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:29 pm

Image
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions

Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

Postby Chaos » Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:43 pm

aesmith wrote:To be honest I'm surprised the CPS has been so easy going. In a criminal matter the defendant has a right to see unused prosecution material that may undermine the prosecution, or assist the defence. He doesn't have a right to demand a list of irrelevant documents, particularly ones that the CPS don't in fact hold. I wonder what the judge actually said that was interpreted by Amanda as "ordering" the CPS to magic these up.



you're assuming 'ordering the CPS' is a true statement. that's quite a stretch.


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest