Quatloos!

Amanda was in London at court on Thursday apparently, no idea why though!

PeterPan wrote:Amanda was in London at court on Thursday apparently, no idea why though!

High Court ?

The etfotb crew haven't mention Tom's appearance in court today , not once.

Another success!!!!1!! Obviously ?

Can't see anything for Tom yet

http://www.thelawpages.com/court-hearin ... -Court.php

Protect your property - by Tom "NFA" Crawford.

That Pippa King is another paranoid self-righteous ass by look of it-

http://alternativeview.co.uk/index.php? ... tion_id=33

They certainly don't have biometrics in schools near me.

Didn't realise that it was a comedy event, is Tom going to dress up as a unicorn

Yes, he can teach you the difference between a warrant and a facsimile that looks like a warrant.

Seriously, that quote should dog him for the rest of his life. In six words, it betrays how puny his whole argument is.

TC promises two extra speakers at his Wake Up bash 11th of this month. A photo of Micky Summers has been added. I don't think it's fair to parade that man on as an authoritative speaker: I think he's a very vulnerable character and Tom etc are exploiting him.

For shame.

Micky Summers isn't vulnerable.

Yes, it appears he was abused as a kid which is horrific but he's an adult now and one that isn't shy at mouthing off despicable things at Police and the Establishment!

I believe it is the same guy, but due to the threats and harassment, he stopped posting, soon after, and will likely remain silent here until his legal case is resolved, at which point he may be able to comment.

However with active litigation, I am guessing unlike the Crawford family, he is keeping quiet, they say any more bad acts on the Crawford side can't be attributed to him. Unfortunately the Crawford crew will not follow this, and probably have said too much already.

So let's give yiamcross some room, follow at a distance, and let the judgement speak for him.

This is only my guess, I have no contact with Clive, but if in the same situation, I would also refrain from comment on an active legal matter where my comments may be taken the wrong way by a few.

I think you're on the right train of thought. It would be interesting to know who the 'Others' are too. I'm sure Ceylon was involved in the threats online. I'm sure we'll get a clearer picture when the case is concluded.

Yep, wait and see I agree. It will all come out in the end I think.

You guys are right - could a mod please delete my post and Pox's post where he quoted me

Thank you

Bones wrote:You guys are right - could a mod please delete my post and Pox's post where he quoted me

Thank you

Done.

Craig Crawford and Amanda Pike are crowing about the conviction for assault and criminal damage by, umm, someone. Craig was a prosecution witness but for some reason doesn't give the name of the someone, but claims he posts on Quatloos.

Craig states they're back in court soon so I take from that there's not been a conviction yet.

Keep that champagne on ice!

Whoever they are yammering about having beaten in court it's not Yiamcross. He wasn't charges with damaging a neighbour's car or assault.

littleFred wrote:Craig Crawford and Amanda Pike are crowing about the conviction for assault and criminal damage by, umm, someone. Craig was a prosecution witness but for some reason doesn't give the name of the someone, but claims he posts on Quatloos.

Craig Crawford:
So today we were witnesses for the assault on two of our friends mark and ellen. And criminal damage on his neighbours car which was caught on tv. A lovely 61 year old woman..
He is part of a site called "quatloos" theyre apparently in the know when it comes to law i say apparently.. because they don't... and they troll people they dont agree with. Some stalk...
The guy was found guilty of assault and criminal damage!!! Crawfords and co 1... stalker. 0

Amanda Pike:
Considering a nats trump normally doesn't go unnoticed by the sad sacks who call themselves quatloser and weirdo trolls on facebook against my family I find it hilarious they haven't made one single post of their fellow associates conviction yesterday. The guy they egged on to attend to report back for them. To funny. They're a joke. I'd also like to point out the judge saying to him "what on earth were you doing attending Mr Crawfords cases for anyway" hahaha their ilk show themselves up time and time again. Sadly they are that deluded they've no idea about how normal people view them nor do they care. When asked in the witness box if i disliked the defendant I explained I didn't (under oath) I replied I just feel incredibly sorry for him and I meant it that goes for all his kind on quatloos and Facebook too. They're a sad sorry lot and most need some sort of evaluation which is a worry but in alot of their cases I feel nessasary To concern yourself with other peoples lives to the point of obsession well.....that needs looked at

Sounds like BS to me. If this was real they would be crowing the defendant's name & address, and there would be some reference to the process of the trial. What defence he offered, what information emerged in the course of the hearing, etc. If this really was one of our regular, established members the opportunity to smear Q would be irresistible. Tom Crawfraud, Colon and the rest of them would be piling in.