Losing Your Home, Crawford Style

[AiusLocutius]

Now, now, everybody.

I'm not sure what you are saying here mate. There is no clash as far as I am aware.

However I'd go with Peanut on this one.

Then you would be incorrect.
I do not wish to steal the thread and go off on a tangent. I feel it is rather good information, don't you? I feel it is one of those little humorous quirky things.

A dolphin is no more a fish than a dead horse washing up on shore.

Incorrect. A dolphin lives in the sea, a horse does not.
I feel this is just one of those nice little bits of information that people generally overlook. You do wish to be accurate....don't you?
I feel you may be making to much of this and reading more than has been said.

[Tuco]

Two posts each from Gummidge and Tuco deleted. In addition, they'll be out of action for a while. Hopefully they'll decide that it's not worth returning.

Damn it, you beat me to it. I was at court all day watching Michael Millar rambling on about how he made an Oath of Innocence to his Creator (capitalization assumed) and this allowed him to exempt himself from paying tax. I'd rather have been banning Tuco.

Here's another opportunity for you.

You seem quick enough to police the internet but scream louder than anyone when someone dares police and question yourselves.

[Burnaby49]

Two posts each from Gummidge and Tuco deleted. In addition, they'll be out of action for a while. Hopefully they'll decide that it's not worth returning.

Damn it, you beat me to it. I was at court all day watching Michael Millar rambling on about how he made an Oath of Innocence to his Creator (capitalization assumed) and this allowed him to exempt himself from paying tax. I'd rather have been banning Tuco.

Here's another opportunity for you.

You seem quick enough to police the internet but scream louder than anyone when someone dares police and question yourselves.

If this upsets you feel free to take your contributions elsewhere. Better yet start your own site where you can encourage totally free discussion without the imposition of we thought police.

[Tuco]

So in essence, I should do anything other than question what is said on here if I don't agree?

[Gregg]

Two posts each from Gummidge and Tuco deleted. In addition, they'll be out of action for a while. Hopefully they'll decide that it's not worth returning.

Damn it, you beat me to it. I was at court all day watching Michael Millar rambling on about how he made an Oath of Innocence to his Creator (capitalization assumed) and this allowed him to exempt himself from paying tax. I'd rather have been banning Tuco.

Here's another opportunity for you.

You seem quick enough to police the internet but scream louder than anyone when someone dares police and question yourselves.

You are more than welcome to shut the phuck up and pack your sorry ass out to somewhere else if you want to. We tolerate you, we may someday get amused by you and start mocking you openly. But I if past performance is any indication of future actions, I doubt we'll ever take you seriously as anything besides a punchline.

So in essence, I should do anything other than question what is said on here if I don't agree?

Sounds like a winner to me Skippy.

[AiusLocutius]

You seem quick enough to police the internet but scream louder than anyone when someone dares police and question yourselves.

You are taking advantage of a simple misunderstanding to push your usual argumentative nonsense.
I don't believe anyone here is buying it.

I don't wish to be the heart of this nonsense, let's get back on topic.

[Tuco]

Why are you telling me all of this?

[Tuco]

You seem quick enough to police the internet but scream louder than anyone when someone dares police and question yourselves.

You are taking advantage of a simple misunderstanding to push your usual argumentative nonsense.
I don't believe anyone here is buying it.

I don't wish to be the heart of this nonsense, let's get back on topic.

I beg to differ.

This forum is wrong on many counts.

It doesn't tolerate challenge and like you, the regulars call my posts "argumentative nonsense"

Feel free to point me to any rational discussion where members are permitted to express an alternative opinion.

[AiusLocutius]

The article states the developer paid £93500 at auction for the property. I thought a lower figure had been mentioned on here?

Think it was bought for £55k at auction then re-sold.

Now that is a nice little earner!

[Tuco]

The article states the developer paid £93500 at auction for the property. I thought a lower figure had been mentioned on here?

Think it was bought for £55k at auction then re-sold.

Now that is a nice little earner!

For who?

[Chaos]

Nice sentiment...but that's not a fish. It's a Dolphin.

The word fish is not defined scientifically or legally, it has no real meaning, it's basically slang. The closest definition of "fish" is something that lives in the sea. Therefore a dolphin can be defined as a fish.
Sorry Peanut.

Now, now, everybody. I think we can all agree on the salient point. It's a dead rotting carcass washed up on shore. Unfortunately for the dophin it's reality rather than a metaphor.

However I'd go with Peanut on this one. A dolphin is no more a fish than a dead horse washing up on shore. A dead horse comes to mind because a few of us once rented a waterfront cottage on British Columbia's sunshine coast. Right on the beach. Unfortunately we also acquired a very overripe dead horse washed up on shore right at the cottage. Made for a very pungent stay.

this all just seems very dolphiny to me.

[LordEd]

this all just seems very dolphiny to me.

It seems freemany to me to argue over the technical definition of fish.

The metaphorical dead rotting <insert answer here> has lost its house AND relevance.

[exiledscouser]

It's because some people have no porpoise in life.....

[Burnaby49]

It's because some people have no porpoise in life.....

Tuco isn't the only one walking the edge on being banned.

[SoLongCeylon]

"Tuco" a definition: [ Warning - slightly offensive language ]

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tuco





PS A dolphin is a mammal not a fish.

[aesmith]

...but that's not a fish.

Reminds me of this, which could also be said of Tom Crawford .. Not Even a Fish

[Bones]

Are you sure it is not a unicorn in disguise ?

[Bones]

You seem quick enough to police the internet but scream louder than anyone when someone dares police and question yourselves.

You are taking advantage of a simple misunderstanding to push your usual argumentative nonsense.
I don't believe anyone here is buying it.

I don't wish to be the heart of this nonsense, let's get back on topic.

I beg to differ.

This forum is wrong on many counts.

It doesn't tolerate challenge and like you, the regulars call my posts "argumentative nonsense"

Feel free to point me to any rational discussion where members are permitted to express an alternative opinion.

Fish/mammal/horse/dolphin ???

At least we all agree your posts are "argumentative nonsense" - Sounds like progress to me

[Bones]

Anyway back to poppa crawfraud and Amanda's deluded version of reality...

[Pox]

...but that's not a fish.

Reminds me of this, which could also be said of Tom Crawford .. Not Even a Fish

Off topic and irrelevant - sorry, but the 'not even a fish' in this video was found dead in July last year - asthma attack apparently.