John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby Bones » Thu Jun 16, 2016 9:41 pm

Personally, I hope he wins in his case against himself. If he wins will he send baliffs to his own home to collect the debt ?

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:34 am

Bones wrote:Personally, I hope he wins in his case against himself. If he wins will he send baliffs to his own home to collect the debt ?
I would prefer the opposite. He refuses to acknowledge himself and disavows the debt. He then takes matters into his own hands, beats himself up and gets arrested for assault.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4395
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Contact:

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby Gregg » Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:23 pm

His intention is to lose and have on the record a debt against him that would (in his small little mind anyhow) later have precedence over any OTHER DEBT that others make take him to court for, and be awarded judgement. In general, unless otherwise provided for in the security agreement, debts reduced to judgement are paid in liquidation in chronological order.
As I said above, its not going to work, for any myriad of reasons, but if nothing else by saying he IS OWED that much money the debt which is a liability to him also becomes an asset to him, that would be subject to liquidation. Followed to a logical, in a Douglas Adams like way, the ASSET could be sold by the liquidator for next to nothing (he can't and isn't going to pay it) but the LIABILITY to pay remains, at face value, and he could end up owing his own bankruptcy estate a quazzillion pounds or however much he says he owes himself.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.

User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1608
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby NYGman » Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:24 pm

Foiled by that darn double sided accounting system again.
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.

User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 3530
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:02 am
Contact:

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby grixit » Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:03 pm

double sided like a mobius strip!
I voted for Hillary, and i didn't even get a stupid tshirt!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby Bones » Sat Aug 13, 2016 7:43 pm

Anyone have any updates on this one, I could do with a good laugh

User avatar
Dr. Caligari
J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
Posts: 1515
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 11:02 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby Dr. Caligari » Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:42 pm

There is American precedent for this kind of lawsuit:

http://loweringthebar.net/2011/04/the-man-who-sued-himself.html
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10767
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby notorial dissent » Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:54 pm

really have to remember when reading that site to make sure that ALL beverages are in the upright and locked position, otherwise, goodbye another keyboard. :snicker:
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby longdog » Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:04 am

Bones wrote:Anyone have any updates on this one, I could do with a good laugh


Pop over to his Facebook profile for some seriously nasty and obsessive anti-semitic, racist and just plain bizarre shite.

Good morning folks. Did you know that Hitler was right?
And so was Colonel Muammar Gaddafi

WHY? Because they fought The JEWS


https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012255699040

It's fuckers like this gobshite who make me want to abandon my life-long atheism and bacon-sandwich-munching and adopt the religion of my grandmothers... Already... Image
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

littleFred
Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby littleFred » Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:51 am

Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.

Another auto-litigant: a New Zealand City Council prosecuted itself for doing some building work without first getting consent from itself. It pleaded guilty, and was fined. Guess who's coffers the fine went into?

ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby ArthurWankspittle » Sun Aug 14, 2016 8:52 am

littleFred wrote:Another auto-litigant
I think I'd prefer Onanistic Litigant.
Going to Tibet now and deleting Facebook you have my email address

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4395
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Contact:

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby Gregg » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:29 pm

littleFred wrote:Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.

Another auto-litigant: a New Zealand City Council prosecuted itself for doing some building work without first getting consent from itself. It pleaded guilty, and was fined. Guess who's coffers the fine went into?


The Attorney?
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.

User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 6339
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 7:39 pm

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby wserra » Sun Aug 14, 2016 1:32 pm

Gregg wrote:
littleFred wrote:Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.

Another auto-litigant: a New Zealand City Council prosecuted itself for doing some building work without first getting consent from itself. It pleaded guilty, and was fined. Guess who's coffers the fine went into?


The Attorney?


Then there is justice in the world.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON

Postby Hercule Parrot » Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:03 am

littleFred wrote:Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.


A hateful idiot...
"Abel Danger Global Network Dedicated to Uncovering Treasonous Acts Against Humanity" :haha:
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest