Rekha Patel loses her house

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Bones » Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:03 pm

Image
Image
Image



Image
Image
Image

littleFred
Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby littleFred » Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:09 pm

As Rekha Patel says, the form is downloadable off the net. Yes, and so what? Does that make a completed form invalid? If so, why?

It isn't an argument, not even a flimsy straw. She might develop the argument, "I think warrants should be on bonded security paper, hand-written with quill pens, and signed personally by the queen in egg-shell blue at 45 degrees. And the standard form of words must not be available on the net."

And she would be entitled to that view. But it ain't the law.

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Bones » Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:17 pm

She claims that there was only concrete covering her tiles..

Image


Yet in her application she says

http://planning.highpeak.gov.uk/portal/ ... KID=129339

3. Description of Proposed Works
Please describe the proposals to alter, extend or demolish the listed building(s):
ALTERATIONS:
REMOVAL OF STUDWORK WALL TO KITCHEN, REMOVAL OF CEILINGS TO FIRST FLOOR LEVEL AND REPLACEMENT CEILING AT HIGHER LEVEL,REPLACEMENT WINDOWS,
REMOVAL OF THACK STONES TO ROOF.

Her own agent confirms what happened

Image

Image
Last edited by Bones on Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:24 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Bones » Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:18 pm

littleFred wrote:As Rekha Patel says, the form is downloadable off the net. Yes, and so what? Does that make a completed form invalid? If so, why?

It isn't an argument, not even a flimsy straw. She might develop the argument, "I think warrants should be on bonded security paper, hand-written with quill pens, and signed personally by the queen in egg-shell blue at 45 degrees. And the standard form of words must not be available on the net."

And she would be entitled to that view. But it ain't the law.


It is part of the Guy Taylor, Tom Crawford and Chrisy Morris fraudulent instrument rubbish

littleFred
Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby littleFred » Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:50 pm

Bones wrote:It is part of the Guy Taylor, Tom Crawford and Chrisy Morris fraudulent instrument rubbish

Yes, indeed. Rekha is parroting the stupidity of others. And it is appalling stupidity. I can almost understand why "it's downloadable off the net" is a slogan used in the heat and emotion of an eviction. But only a moment's thought should tell her that the availability of standard form on the internet doesn't make a completed form invalid, or that it has to be signed, or anything else. It is a total non-argument.

I assume Rekha is actually qualified to teach maths. So she's probably not totally stupid. But the UK SovCit movement, as promoted by Guy, Tom, Ebert, Chrisy, Faljay and others spreads stupidity like a genital virus.

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Bones » Fri Feb 03, 2017 7:55 pm

What she doesn't mention (neither does Tom, Guy or Chrisy) is that yes they are downloadable but they are downloable from the 'Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service' website

https://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/ ... mFinder.do

and to have any standing in law they must be stamped/sealed by a Court, which as we know Tom's and Rekha's both were

I just don't understand the downloadable argument - Just doesn't make any rational sense :shrug:

Pox
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 895
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:17 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Pox » Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:35 pm

Is there a flying freehold involved in this? It doesn't really matter in the scheme of things - the judgements are against her anyway, but from what she has posted on the links above, it looks like there is.

User avatar
morrand
Pirate Captain
Pirate Captain
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:42 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby morrand » Sat Feb 04, 2017 2:19 am

Bones wrote:
Image


Seeing this led me to go through a few of the other drawings on Ms Patel's application for planning permission.

Is this typical of the level of detail/quality that goes into planning applications? Because I'm lining up a series of snotty comments about them, but if that's customary for this sort of thing, then they're not really deserved, and I'd rather keep them to myself.
---
Morrand

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Hercule Parrot » Sat Feb 04, 2017 2:25 am

Image
This Barry Evans chap is rather good - do we know him, have we reached out an invitation to join the Soros team?
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Binch, noted legal expert.

User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 3361
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 7:02 am
Contact:

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby grixit » Sat Feb 04, 2017 5:23 am

morrand wrote:
Bones wrote:
Image


Seeing this led me to go through a few of the other drawings on Ms Patel's application for planning permission.

Is this typical of the level of detail/quality that goes into planning applications? Because I'm lining up a series of snotty comments about them, but if that's customary for this sort of thing, then they're not really deserved, and I'd rather keep them to myself.


Every architectural drawing i've ever seen has more details than that. Heck, do it yourself home improvement diagrams have more details. Likewise the brochure in the shelving materials aisle of Home Depot.
I voted for Hillary, and i didn't even get a stupid tshirt!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 9877
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby notorial dissent » Sat Feb 04, 2017 9:20 am

Looks like amateur city to me, which would be in keeping with the quality of help she apparently hired. I still can't imagine why she, and/or her builder thought it would be alright to damage/remove building/structural material from the neighbor's house.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

He Who Knows
Pirates Mate
Pirates Mate
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:30 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby He Who Knows » Sat Feb 04, 2017 10:28 am

Seems she had many builders. The first one, who cut off the thackstones, ran off never to be found. Someone on social media said last summer that he was a friend of her brother's. Think we all know by now she has a penchant for dodgy 'fringes of society types' rather than squeaky clean professionals/experts. That's why she's come unstsuck in court. Even her barrister Henry Hendron has since been struck off .
I learned long ago never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty and besides, the pig likes it.
(George Bernard Shaw).

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 9877
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby notorial dissent » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:30 pm

I think the word you're looking for is CHEAP.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Firthy2002
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:24 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Firthy2002 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 3:57 pm

The next court hearing will be a riotous affair.
-=Firthy2002=-

Watching idiots dig themselves into holes since 2016.

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Bones » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:35 pm

Can someone else take a look.. Has all the Baron's posts on Rekha's page been deleted/removed ?

Mine has gone from this

Image

to

Image

He Who Knows
Pirates Mate
Pirates Mate
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:30 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby He Who Knows » Sat Feb 04, 2017 7:11 pm

Nope the Baron's comments are still there. Sorry to break the news Bones but I think he's blocked you. :thinking:
I learned long ago never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty and besides, the pig likes it.
(George Bernard Shaw).

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Bones » Sat Feb 04, 2017 7:36 pm

He Who Knows wrote:Nope the Baron's comments are still there. Sorry to break the news Bones but I think he's blocked you. :thinking:


Blocked me, how rude !!!!1!!

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 725
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby TheNewSaint » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:57 pm

Bones wrote:
He Who Knows wrote:Nope the Baron's comments are still there. Sorry to break the news Bones but I think he's blocked you. :thinking:


Blocked me, how rude !!!!1!!


Hey, at least you got noticed for once. :snicker:

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 5050
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Burnaby49 » Sat Feb 04, 2017 9:43 pm

TheNewSaint wrote:
Bones wrote:
He Who Knows wrote:Nope the Baron's comments are still there. Sorry to break the news Bones but I think he's blocked you. :thinking:


Blocked me, how rude !!!!1!!


Hey, at least you got noticed for once. :snicker:


Noticed, perhaps. But not mentioned.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs

User avatar
Bones
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1874
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:12 pm
Location: Laughing at Tuco

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Postby Bones » Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:48 pm

:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest