Rekha Patel loses her house

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7502
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by The Observer »

HardyW wrote:Strangely, although the estate agent's front external photo shows the house with windows and doors sealed up, the interior pics are of the house fully furnished and obviously lived-in. Not sure what that indicates.
Well, if it means that the house is being advertised as "furnished", I would have to wonder does that mean that the buyer has to take in Wrecka as well?
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
He Who Knows
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 650
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:30 am
Location: Rimstinger Strasse, Wankendorf, Germany

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by He Who Knows »

Reeds Rains internal shots are the same as the last estate agent's internal shots, ie the contents haven't moved. I'm guessing the solicitors aren't gonna risk her coming back for her stuff without a 24 hour security presence watching her every move. Maybe when they sell it she'll be able to pick up all her belongings from a skip outside surrounded by dog patrol.
The wise man does at once what the fool does finally (Niccolo Machiavelli)...and what the FMOTL never does (He Who Knows)
aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1437
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by aesmith »

It's quite normal for estate agents to show photos with the current (or previous) owner's furniture in place. Irrespective of practicality in normal sales, houses generally look better furnished. I wouldn't take it to imply that the furnishings are included, or even that the house is currently furnished, they may just be the same photos we saw before.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

For those playing along in the colonies, it is normal to sell a property with "vacant possession" but that requirement only becomes applicable at the point the seller moves out and the new purchaser gets possession. There is a whole load of law and case law about being late, not emptying the place out, etc. etc. If Rekha doesn't move her stuff out when she gets offered the chance, the next owner can get compensation for her stuff being in the way and having to dispose of it.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 4788
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by longdog »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:If Rekha doesn't move her stuff out when she gets offered the chance, the next owner can get compensation for her stuff being in the way and having to dispose of it.
I have a sneaking suspicion that's exactly what's going to happen. She'll be offered an appointment to remove her crap from her former home and because she's a stubborn and deluded nut-job she'll refuse to remove her shit from 'her' home because she still believes it IS her home. As a result it'll end up being skipped and she'll foot the bill from the proceeds of the sale.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by TheNewSaint »

What about all Rekha's prior evictions? Could the court argue she's already had plenty of time and explicit orders to move out, and skip straight to disposing of it?
longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 4788
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by longdog »

TheNewSaint wrote:What about all Rekha's prior evictions? Could the court argue she's already had plenty of time and explicit orders to move out, and skip straight to disposing of it?
I would imagine the courts would back any course of action which was reasonable in all of the circumstances. Given that she has treated the orders of the court with contempt so far and cannot be trusted to have unescorted access to the property it's highly unlikely she would be allowed back on the property without a large security presence and probably the assistance of the police if they are willing to attend... Which is doubtful. My best guess would be the house will be cleared by a removals firm and RP will foot the bill for the removal and storage in much the same way as in Tom Crawford's case.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
User avatar
The Observer
Further Moderator
Posts: 7502
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by The Observer »

Perhaps Wrecka will get hold of a parking boot and clamp herself to the furniture inside the house.
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff

"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by notorial dissent »

I'm just hoping that as part of the sale order that the court issues a permanent stay away order to Wrekha and her minions/landlords/whatever for the sake of the new owner's peaceful enjoyment, should also have one issued for the benefit of the neighbor as well. If I were buying the property I would insist on it.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

I can't see that you could include such a clause in the purchase contract. However, as a residential property it is a criminal offence to "squat" in it. The new owner has the protect of this and burglary type laws, plus, as I have already pointed out, the law is very reluctant to prosecute home owners if someone "happened" to get injured while they were breaking into your home. (Killing them with an unregistered firearm is treated a bit differently.)
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by AndyPandy »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:I can't see that you could include such a clause in the purchase contract. However, as a residential property it is a criminal offence to "squat" in it. The new owner has the protect of this and burglary type laws, plus, as I have already pointed out, the law is very reluctant to prosecute home owners if someone "happened" to get injured while they were breaking into your home. (Killing them with an unregistered firearm is treated a bit differently.)
At some point in the criminal proceedings (probable if she's found guilty and prior to sentencing) the probation service will become involved, one of the aspects of what they do is to assess the possibility of reoffending.

So either she'll fail to co-operate with the probation service ( not very clever ) or she'll bombastically insist the property remains hers and will state her intention to continue to attend her property and to harass her poor previous neighbour.

If that's noted or she's a failure to attend any probation interview ordered, then a restraining order will in most likely be put in place by the Judge.
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by Gregg »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:For those playing along in the colonies, it is normal to sell a property with "vacant possession" but that requirement only becomes applicable at the point the seller moves out and the new purchaser gets possession. There is a whole load of law and case law about being late, not emptying the place out, etc. etc. If Rekha doesn't move her stuff out when she gets offered the chance, the next owner can get compensation for her stuff being in the way and having to dispose of it.

Might I suggest a bonfire and perhaps exorcism....?
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Wakeman52
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 302
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Location: North of the Watford Gap, UK

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by Wakeman52 »

There is indeed a 'Security Dog Unit' van parked at the top of Simmondley Village; seen by friends who visited the nearby (& recently reopened) Hare & Hounds pub a few days ago.

On the subject of exclusion orders, didn't Tom C have one imposed which prevented him from going anywhere near his old bungalow? Is that still in force? You'd think that Plexus Law would be aware and so would be seeking a similar restraint on Ms P (& possibly Mr McD).
Our future is like that of the passengers on a small pleasure boat sailing quietly above the Niagara Falls, not knowing that the engines are about to fail. James Lovelock.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

Wakeman52 wrote:There is indeed a 'Security Dog Unit' van parked at the top of Simmondley Village; seen by friends who visited the nearby (& recently reopened) Hare & Hounds pub a few days ago.
Didn't see one when I was up there but I think that was about six weeks back. Might be back over that way soon so will have another look.
Wakeman52 wrote:On the subject of exclusion orders, didn't Tom C have one imposed which prevented him from going anywhere near his old bungalow? Is that still in force?
I think it was for 12 months so it will have expired by now.
Wakeman52 wrote: You'd think that Plexus Law would be aware and so would be seeking a similar restraint on Ms P (& possibly Mr McD).
There isn't a plaintiff yet though which could be the issue. You can't get an order against a specific person to restrain them from doing something to someone who isn't identified I would have thought. Once a buyer has exchanged contracts, that is a completely different matter as the contracted purchaser then has a definite interest.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
rosy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 262
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 12:41 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by rosy »

Getting an order for Ms P to stay away from the neighbour and the neighbour's home would be possible, I think, and would have the same effect.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

rosy wrote:Getting an order for Ms P to stay away from the neighbour and the neighbour's home would be possible, I think, and would have the same effect.
I was think civil court. A Magistrate or higher court could do that as a condition of sentence following conviction but it would have to be time limited and, of course, has to be after conviction, which hasn't happened yet.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by AndyPandy »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:
rosy wrote:Getting an order for Ms P to stay away from the neighbour and the neighbour's home would be possible, I think, and would have the same effect.
I was think civil court. A Magistrate or higher court could do that as a condition of sentence following conviction but it would have to be time limited and, of course, has to be after conviction, which hasn't happened yet.
I thought it was a part of her bail conditions to stay away from the property, 5 miles rings a bell?
pgk70
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:59 am

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by pgk70 »

Wakeman52 wrote:There is indeed a 'Security Dog Unit' van parked at the top of Simmondley Village;
If it's a private security setup, then presumably Patel is paying for this herself (even if she doesn't know it yet), wonder if her landlord will give her a refund to cover it?
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by AndyPandy »

pgk70 wrote:
Wakeman52 wrote:There is indeed a 'Security Dog Unit' van parked at the top of Simmondley Village;
If it's a private security setup, then presumably Patel is paying for this herself (even if she doesn't know it yet), wonder if her landlord will give her a refund to cover it?
More to the point, when the house is sold and they've paid the balance of the equity to this Company is he going to pay it back to her !!??
daltontrumbno
Captain
Captain
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:38 pm

Re: Rekha Patel loses her house

Post by daltontrumbno »

AndyPandy wrote:
pgk70 wrote:
Wakeman52 wrote:There is indeed a 'Security Dog Unit' van parked at the top of Simmondley Village;
If it's a private security setup, then presumably Patel is paying for this herself (even if she doesn't know it yet), wonder if her landlord will give her a refund to cover it?
More to the point, when the house is sold and they've paid the balance of the equity to this Company is he going to pay it back to her !!??
The Chancery court ruled the sales to the shell companies null and void, so presumably the Ballance will return to Rekha, but the way things are going there will be very little if any equity left for Rekha once this is finally over.