Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 9:53 pm
Hey, don't diss pubic lice. As my old Sarge used to say, "scratch 'em if you've got 'em".
Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/
We could follow the example of the Ratbags web site (which seems to be on hiatus) and come up with an annual award. Ratbags has an "Anus Maximus Award" for the worst of the year's web sites, and Highly Commended and Encouragement awards. We could come up with our own, with only those banned from Quatloos barred from eligibility.Hercule Parrot wrote:There's too many of them to keep count. Maybe just track the big-hitters, the selfless heroes who donated the full value of their home to support the welfare of countless bailiffs, lawyers, locksmiths, bankers and shuttering contractors? Such generosity should not go unrecognised. I think we should award some kind of special recognition, The Quatloos Medal of Philanthropy perhaps?TheNewSaint wrote:Quatloos should keep a scoreboard for this. A list of everyone who went the freetard route, and how much it cost them above and beyond the original debt.Gregg wrote:Counting the parents, she now is on my shortlist for the 2017 "Crawford Award for Egregious Equity Evaporation,". Final debt owing after liquidation just north of £100,000!
Fully brevetted members : Gedaljahu Ebert, Guy Taylor, Tom Crawford and Baron VonTrampbeard
Candidate members : Neelu Berry, Wrecker Patel, Helen Gardiner and Robert "Pubic Louse" White
As I recall they had to tear up the original historic flooring to do it and it makes me wonder what corners they cut in doing that and putting it back.Firthy2002 wrote:I believe it was underfloor heating she had installed.
You can see her files and computer that she used for her amazing research. Clearly its been left in a "get out now" state.Siegfried Shrink wrote:http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for ... 13474.html
Must admit that bit made me smirk, oh the irony!!letissier14 wrote:I liked this bit on the website
Please Note - This property is a Grade II listed building within the Conservation Area.
Rowcliffes have not checked if any works undertaken comply to the relevant restrictions.
Any interested party must make their own enquiries with regards to compliance of any Grade II listing restrictions
Usually when a house is taken into possession the previous owner's given the chance to go back, accompanied by the estate agent, to remove their stuff. In this case, given that she's already broken in once before, I expect the property agents will just get a removal van, load everything up and drop it off at an address of Wrecker's choice. Or on her parents' driveway. I can't imagine any circumstances in which she'd be allowed back in to pack her things.TheCoz wrote:
You can see her files and computer that she used for her amazing research. Clearly its been left in a "get out now" state.
I have no doubt the neighbours will be so glad to see the back of Ms Patel they will happily disclose everything they know to any prospective punter.rosy wrote:It's a lovely property underneath the mess and horrendous décor. I smirked at the bit about checking all the works - I have to wonder if a purchaser is letting themselves in for some massive repair bills.
Really very sad to see someone squander a nice home. Her teaching career is probably on thin ice too, and a bit of an awkward atmosphere with family. 44yrs old, and she's sleeping in someone's spare room with a few scraps of personal property.TheCoz wrote:You can see her files and computer that she used for her amazing research. Clearly its been left in a "get out now" state.