"practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

JimUk1
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by JimUk1 »

Isn't Russ a Tommy Crawford supporter also?

Could next weeks "wake up" meeting end in a very one sided brawl?
Just let me get my head around this;

Dave doesn't want people Promoting fmotl tactics (and tries to distance himself from it), but is going to do a presentation at a freeman BS talk?
littleFred
Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
Posts: 1363
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:12 am
Location: England, UK

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by littleFred »

David Robinson is hunting for converts to his way, the Only True Way.
JimUk1
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by JimUk1 »

littleFred wrote:David Robinson is hunting for converts to his way, the Only True Way.

Oh the school playground fights kicking off- (On Russ' page)


https://m.facebook.com/groups/193082005 ... 7104965473
Ted Striker
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 6:00 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Ted Striker »

JimUk1 - another site is accusing you of being a secret FMOTL.
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by AndyPandy »

Crab Bait saying he owns not just £31k in business rates but also a further £11k (which isn't currently a part of the bankruptcy proceedings), which from memory is addressed to him and his wife, is he risking her Liberty (joint and severally liable) as well as his own ?

https://m.facebook.com/groups/388605611 ... _tn__=%2As
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Gregg »

Ted Striker wrote:JimUk1 - another site is accusing you of being a secret FMOTL.
And you were so concerned that you found our site, registered and posted this to warn him?

I was tempted to delete (actually move to super sekrit archive, we delete nothing) and someone else may. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and leaving it.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Ted Striker
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 6:00 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Ted Striker »

Gregg wrote: And you were so concerned that you found our site, registered and posted this to warn him?
No, I follow this site occasionally and was aware what had been said elsewhere. Just giving the heads up. It's someone who posts on here who's saying it.
ArthurWankspittle
Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
Posts: 3755
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
Location: Quatloos Immigration Control

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by ArthurWankspittle »

AndyPandy wrote:Crab Bait saying he owns not just £31k in business rates but also a further £11k (which isn't currently a part of the bankruptcy proceedings), which from memory is addressed to him and his wife, is he risking her Liberty (joint and severally liable) as well as his own ?
I think business rates and the other debt will be purely Civil matters so no loss of liberty at risk.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by AndyPandy »

ArthurWankspittle wrote:
AndyPandy wrote:Crab Bait saying he owns not just £31k in business rates but also a further £11k (which isn't currently a part of the bankruptcy proceedings), which from memory is addressed to him and his wife, is he risking her Liberty (joint and severally liable) as well as his own ?
I think business rates and the other debt will be purely Civil matters so no loss of liberty at risk.
So business rates don't fall under the Council Tax regulations?

So unless the second £11k amount is Council Tax, the only danger of imprisonment may be if they add to or issue a separate, joint bankruptcy petition for the £11k and neither one of them turns up at Court, then they may do a jimmywesq 18 hour stretch ?
Forsyth
Pirate Captain
Pirate Captain
Posts: 235
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 8:36 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Forsyth »

AndyPandy wrote:So business rates don't fall under the Council Tax regulations?
I think that if the business is a company then it's the business that's liable, if the business is a sole trader then the person is liable. If correct, this would mean that a sole trader could be put into prison, but a company could only be put into administration.
AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by AndyPandy »

Forsyth wrote:
AndyPandy wrote:So business rates don't fall under the Council Tax regulations?
I think that if the business is a company then it's the business that's liable, if the business is a sole trader then the person is liable. If correct, this would mean that a sole trader could be put into prison, but a company could only be put into administration.
The business premises in question were a nightclub, most business premises are leased and the majority of landlords require you to sign the lease not in a Company name but in your own name, which has the effect of making the lease holder both personally liable for the rental payments and the business rates.
SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by SteveUK »

The rat king announces the inevitable

Image
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 993
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:53 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Chaos »

littleFred wrote: [quote=""David Robinson"]Ollie was forced under duress to cough up or face 25 days in their stinking prison. We could not allow this and would have raised the monet to get him out.
[/quote]


and that statement makes it seem like all he would have had to do was 25 days and he would have been in the clear but he couldn't even do that. lol

I would bet a monet would have cost more than what is owed in tax. :D
Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 993
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:53 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Chaos »

SteveUK wrote:We've been rumbled !!1!!

Image

liars. the 'rude bits' are all over the site. just ask the cfrauds. :lol:
JimUk1
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1260
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:47 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by JimUk1 »

Ted Striker wrote:JimUk1 - another site is accusing you of being a secret FMOTL.
:snicker:

Quiet the honour! I'm enjoying my holiday in Croatia and Montenegro reading that, so at some stage I've had to legitimately get a passport, and pu chase really currency and also abide by law, so comes as quiet a shock that I've hid it from my conscious self?

But thanks for the heads up! And chance of a link or screen shot?
Ted Striker
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 6:00 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Ted Striker »

PM'd you.
Ted Striker
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 6:00 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Ted Striker »

JimUk1 wrote: But thanks for the heads up! And chance of a link or screen shot?
Image
Image

'Peterbard' posts on here as [redacted by mod], and no doubt a few more.
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7559
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by wserra »

If you want to out someone, do it in a PM.

We are not starting another flame war.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
Location: Brea, CA

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by Arthur Rubin »

wserra wrote:If you want to out someone, do it in a PM.

We are not starting another flame war.
I don't think anyone in his right mind thinks that anyone posting here other than (the former user known as) Tuco is a FMOTL, and Tuco denied being a FMOTL, so outing him as a FMOTL is fair game.

[Edited to add] As far as I know, we don't have a rule against obviously fake outing, or reporting on obviously absurd "outing". (Wikipedia does have such rules....)
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7559
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Post by wserra »

It wasn't that I had a problem with, Arthur. It was pointing a finger at a current Q poster as the culprit. That's what I redacted.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume