Page 119 of 147

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:10 am
by Siegfried Shrink
Ms Jane must be shaking in her thigh high leather boots (I just see her this way, somehow) as she takes a moment from grinding the faces of the poor under said boots to try and grasp the implications of the forthcoming Notice.

Ho Hum.

Back to face grinding.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:44 am
by rumpelstilzchen
That is a very good letter: If you think you are right in law go to court. Bring it on.
Perfect response.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 7:50 pm
by notorial dissent
rumpelstilzchen wrote:That is a very good letter: If you think you are right in law go to court. Bring it on.
Perfect response.
But since they don't recognize the "pretend" courts, that is going to be difficult for this valiant PLD warrior. Then of course, if he did go to court, he'd just get properly hammered by a very bored and really uninterested in his fantasy legal theories judge so no win that way.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:31 pm
by longdog
notorial dissent wrote:
rumpelstilzchen wrote:That is a very good letter: If you think you are right in law go to court. Bring it on.
Perfect response.
But since they don't recognize the "pretend" courts, that is going to be difficult for this valiant PLD warrior. Then of course, if he did go to court, he'd just get properly hammered by a very bored and really uninterested in his fantasy legal theories judge so no win that way.
I'm pretty sure that Bobby White will soon be announcing the establishment of legally lawful common law courts of record after his meeting with that McRebel some weeks ago. Once they have established their own courts Ms Jane will be for it!
Robert White shared a link.
3 September at 16:04

Great to meet all the likeminded people in Glasgow last Wednesday night, the rebellion movement is really starting to move now. There was some excellent information on how the common law courts will work, I’m sure everyone will agree, with the non courts we have at the moment there is no justice. There will be a video coming in the next week or two explaining clearly how it will work, so please be patient and watch the whole video when it is launched. There are some good times ahead before the end of this year, including, The New Chartist Movement’, common law courts and of course the seizure of a public building. Times are changing rebels, justice is not far away now, just keep the faith and let everyone know about

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 10:13 pm
by notorial dissent
Does anyone happen to know or have a clue who the Wawful Webel up north of the border is? I would imagine that idiots of Crabby's caliber are plentiful up there things being what they are.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:41 am
by grixit
Siegfried Shrink wrote:Ms Jane must be shaking in her thigh high leather boots (I just see her this way, somehow)
Lemme guess-- she also has a black leather miniskirt with matching jacket, wears her hair in a tight bun, and carries a riding crop.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:32 am
by Siegfried Shrink
How did you guess?

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:37 pm
by longdog
I see her more as the stern librarian type with horn rimmed glasses and her hair in bun then we can wait until she lets her hair down and takes of her glasses and say "Why my darling.... You're beautiful!"

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:42 pm
by exiledscouser
longdog wrote:I see her more as the stern librarian type with horn rimmed glasses and her hair in bun then we can wait until she lets her hair down and takes of her glasses and say "Why my darling.... You're beautiful!"
Longdog. Why, WHY did you have to bring James Blunt into this? The fantasy was in full swing right up till now....

:cry:

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:59 pm
by longdog
exiledscouser wrote:
longdog wrote:I see her more as the stern librarian type with horn rimmed glasses and her hair in bun then we can wait until she lets her hair down and takes of her glasses and say "Why my darling.... You're beautiful!"
Longdog. Why, WHY did you have to bring James Blunt into this? The fantasy was in full swing right up till now....

:cry:
I apologise but it was purely accidental as I know little of this James Blunt about which you speak. Am I right in thinking he was a singer who once had some gramophone records in the hit parade? :shrug:

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 3:06 pm
by exiledscouser

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:25 pm
by katiHWB
did you have to??
Put me right off my dinner that did :sarcastic:

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:56 pm
by rumpelstilzchen
For a long time I have felt that "a James" should replace "a Sir Anthony" in rhyming slang. It seems more apt.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 6:04 pm
by rosy
I think Jeremy Hunt has the first call on the rhyming slang replacement. At least James Blunt was a soldier and does great banter on Twitter!

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 6:07 am
by Gregg
longdog wrote:I see her more as the stern librarian type with horn rimmed glasses and her hair in bun then we can wait until she lets her hair down and takes of her glasses and say "Why my darling.... You're beautiful!"

I'm hoping to get Elizabeth Hurley to role play that scene while I'm in England next year.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:10 am
by SteveUK
1bn REs says it'll never happen
My fellow patriots.
The following was posted on a ukip page.
They want to make their choice heard for the brexit.

We can hyjack this idea and make it ours if we act quickly enough and get our voice heard first as it's is fast more important.
Here is that post on the ukip page.
*****************
Recived this earlier today. Please join in if you can.

We are currently working on a Facebook page that should go live during next week, we will be looking to find volunteers in every village town hamlet city & county that can coordinate small groups of 10 that can all meet near a sliproad on ALL MAJOR ROADS across the uk on 1 day at 1 time,,,

Then all the thousands of small groups will get in convoy and using hazard lights slowly & safely slow down to 10 mph ,,,those afraid of work repercussions can "conveniently find flags and banners" in their boot while phoning the boss saying " sorry I'm stuck in this huge protest and will be late,,,can't get past them"

This is one protest that CANNOT be policed, cannot be kettled, and the BBC SKY & other news media CANNOT IGNORE,,

A rolling roadblock accessible to all,
No travelling miles,no standing around cold & wet, no being kettled like sheep, and totally cannot be policed,
If you want to be heard,,,the ROLLING ROADBLOCK is coming to your main road soon. Please join us
*********

This is a great idea and we should be doing it within the week.
What do you think my fellow patriots

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:34 am
by notorial dissent
No grasp of reality whatsoever.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:45 am
by ArthurWankspittle
....We are currently working on a Facebook page that should go live during next week, we will be looking to find volunteers in every village town hamlet city & county that can coordinate small groups of 10 that can all meet near a sliproad on ALL MAJOR ROADS across the uk on 1 day at 1 time,,,

Then all the thousands of small groups will get in convoy and using hazard lights slowly & safely slow down to 10 mph....
:haha:
Let's see - M60 say 25 junctions, 3 lanes each way, so that's 300 cars driven by drivers with the skills of stuntmen just to get one car length at each junction. To have any effect you are going to need at least three cars per lane so that means about 1000 drivers.
Now add that minimum speed on a motorway is 25mph and people have been successfully prosecuted for driving without due care for driving too slowly on ordinary roads.
No one is going to notice and no one cares.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:02 am
by JimUk1
ArthurWankspittle wrote:
....We are currently working on a Facebook page that should go live during next week, we will be looking to find volunteers in every village town hamlet city & county that can coordinate small groups of 10 that can all meet near a sliproad on ALL MAJOR ROADS across the uk on 1 day at 1 time,,,

Then all the thousands of small groups will get in convoy and using hazard lights slowly & safely slow down to 10 mph....
:haha:
Let's see - M60 say 25 junctions, 3 lanes each way, so that's 300 cars driven by drivers with the skills of stuntmen just to get one car length at each junction. To have any effect you are going to need at least three cars per lane so that means about 1000 drivers.
Now add that minimum speed on a motorway is 25mph and people have been successfully prosecuted for driving without due care for driving too slowly on ordinary roads.
No one is going to notice and no one cares.
And not forgetting motorway driving is incredibly infuriating at the best of times.

I can see them p***ing people off more than raising awareness......not that they will go through with it anyway.

Re: "practical lawful dissent" fmotl advisory group

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:44 am
by aesmith
Let's say they did manage the impossible and so something like this. What response are they hoping for from the government? Even in their deluded world do they imagine it would be possible for any government to agree to their demands which seems to consist mainly of stopping tax collection and law enforcement?