Sovrun Paraleguls

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

King Lud
Swabby
Swabby
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:18 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby King Lud » Mon Jul 10, 2017 4:33 pm

SteveUK wrote:How odd - I still see all the original content on his site. Doesn't look like anything has been removed ?


I can see the documents too.

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby longdog » Mon Jul 10, 2017 4:48 pm

The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby AndyPandy » Mon Jul 10, 2017 4:51 pm

longdog wrote:The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.


Apologies, two separate pages, one headed possession orders with the Court docs, the other mortgage fraud without !

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby SteveUK » Mon Jul 10, 2017 5:01 pm

AndyPandy wrote:
longdog wrote:The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.


Apologies, two separate pages, one headed possession orders with the Court docs, the other mortgage fraud without !


Either way, it all adds up to one amazing loss for our heroes!
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby longdog » Mon Jul 10, 2017 5:11 pm

SteveUK wrote:
AndyPandy wrote:
longdog wrote:The court documents were never on the 'mortgage fraud' page. The page in question is here... http://www.expertinalllegalmatters.com/possession-order and has neither been deleted nor updated since the huge victory.


Apologies, two separate pages, one headed possession orders with the Court docs, the other mortgage fraud without !


Either way, it all adds up to one amazing loss for our heroes!


What amuses me most is that the 'expert' has left the 'mortgage fraud' page up even though it's a public admission that the 'possession order' case was at best vexatious and at worst criminally actionable. Given the documents and 'legal advice' on the 'fraud' page there's no way Ms Gardiner or the 'expert' could possibly have a good faith belief that they were entitled to possession of No 17.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

AndyPandy
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 996
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby AndyPandy » Mon Jul 10, 2017 10:10 pm

longdog wrote:What amuses me most is that the 'expert' has left the 'mortgage fraud' page up even though it's a public admission that the 'possession order' case was at best vexatious and at worst criminally actionable. Given the documents and 'legal advice' on the 'fraud' page there's no way Ms Gardiner or the 'expert' could possibly have a good faith belief that they were entitled to possession of No 17.


He thought he was being clever and she doesn't look or sound like the sharpest tool in the box, so would be easily convinced.

I suspect the Judge threw them out of Court with a hefty costs order, hence the silence. He had his arse kicked and has slunk away to lick his wounds and wait for his next vulnerable victim to fall into his clutches.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1333
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby Hercule Parrot » Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:02 am

AndyPandy wrote:I suspect the Judge threw them out of Court with a hefty costs order, hence the silence. He had his arse kicked and has slunk away to lick his wounds and wait for his next vulnerable victim to fall into his clutches.


Yep, another victory for the ExpertInFuckAll. What's remarkable is the conspiracy of silence - all the usual FB pages are completely silent. All the people who cheered him on, none of them are asking what happened.

On the bright side, it was a fun trip for EIFA - didn't cost him anything more than the train ticket, and Hackney Helen can pick up the pieces...
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Binch, noted legal expert.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1333
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby Hercule Parrot » Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:08 am

Pottapaug1938 wrote:"Since 2012, Helen has been fighting to get her original contract from the company she took out her mortgage with. Since then, another mortgage company has taken over her account i.e. brought the account from the previous company, so, she has been trying for the last four years to get her original agreement. This is a clear breach of contract law, as one contract cannot roll over when a new lender has taken over. A new contract must be issued by the new provider and must set out new terms and conditions under contract law, and most importantly, must be signed by the debtor and creditor and witnessed."

I don't know how things work in the UK; but every mortgage I've ever seen, in the past 30 years, on this side of the pond, contains a provision permitting the assignment of the mortgage elsewhere...


Same here. The EIFA is talking nonsense. A contract which contains provision for assignation or sale does not have to be replaced when assignation or sale occurs. And E&W residential mortgages always contain provision for assignation or sale. So there is no need for a new contract, as the current contract remains valid.

He is either very stupid, or he knows that his target audience are very stupid.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Binch, noted legal expert.

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby SteveUK » Tue Jul 11, 2017 6:14 am

Ultimately, a minor typo will not be allowed to frustrate the deal.

Did you take the banks money? Yes. Do you live in the house you have registered at the LR? yes.

Are you stark raving lunatic chancing it? Yes.

As o'bernica found out the hard way,these admin errors are no "remedy".
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby SteveUK » Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:15 pm

Another Hollywood blockbuster in the makfailing.

Image
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

MaritalArtist
Gunners Mate
Gunners Mate
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 2:38 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby MaritalArtist » Tue Jul 11, 2017 12:59 pm

Well Ya I No TV Productions do have some quality content on their site-

The famous "Meet Your Strawman"
http://www.yainoproductions.com/your-strawman/

And an appearance by our old friend Ceylon
http://www.yainoproductions.com/yorkshire-water/

Though why YouTube videos are on a TV production company site is beyond me.

John Uskglass
Gunners Mate
Gunners Mate
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 2:21 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby John Uskglass » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:22 pm

Strangely, YA I NO was dissolved on 17 June this year.

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/search?q=08886594

IANAL, but isn't trading once dissolved a bit iffy?

Siegfried Shrink
First Mate
First Mate
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: West Midlands, England
Contact:

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby Siegfried Shrink » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:24 pm

Does claiming your page is copywrite invalidate your copyright?

JimUk1
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:47 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby JimUk1 » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:36 pm

Siegfried Shrink wrote:Does claiming your page is copywrite invalidate your copyright?


Copyright is unlawful you see!

But 'copywriting'- is not because you're just waking up the sheeple :haha:

Siegfried Shrink
First Mate
First Mate
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: West Midlands, England
Contact:

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby Siegfried Shrink » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:43 pm

Thank you for that explanation which will help keep my feet on the True Path.

Surely Satan must have prompted me to mock!!!!

Off for some more scourging.

SteveUK
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 8:30 pm
Location: Nottingham

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby SteveUK » Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:56 pm

John Uskglass wrote:Strangely, YA I NO was dissolved on 17 June this year.

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/search?q=08886594

IANAL, but isn't trading once dissolved a bit iffy?


They shouldn't be allowed to trade on the basis of still using CorelDraw v1 to produce their graphics!
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????

Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1403
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Brea, CA

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby Arthur Rubin » Tue Jul 11, 2017 3:54 pm

Siegfried Shrink wrote:Does claiming your page is copywrite invalidate your copyright?
(A serious note....perhaps). It doesn't explicitly disclaim or release copyright, so no. However, they do not recognize the validity of the courts where they would have to file an infringement claim....
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10081
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby notorial dissent » Tue Jul 11, 2017 4:22 pm

Really hard to enforce a legal claim if you don't acknowledge the authority oif the only entity that can legall enforce it. Quite a Image except for the hypocrisy factor, then again, that is this bunch's stock in trade.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

User avatar
Philistine
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:43 am
Location: Turtle Island

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby Philistine » Tue Jul 11, 2017 5:35 pm

SteveUK wrote:
John Uskglass wrote:Strangely, YA I NO was dissolved on 17 June this year.

[url][/url]

IANAL, but isn't trading once dissolved a bit iffy?


They shouldn't be allowed to trade on the basis of still using CorelDraw v1 to produce their graphics!


This. :lol:
I was going to say that their flyer looked like a clown threw up on paper.

exiledscouser
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 502
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:01 pm

Re: Sovrun Paraleguls

Postby exiledscouser » Tue Jul 11, 2017 5:58 pm

Siegfried Shrink wrote:
Surely Satan must have prompted me to mock!!!!

Off for some more scourging.


Reminds me of the apocryphal story of the man on his deathbed asked by the priest to renounce Satan.

"Now is not the time" he reportedly said "to start making enemies".


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests