Page 1 of 1

Jay Bradley

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:41 am
by letissier14
I thought it was time Jay Bardley had his own post.

Jay is one of the infamous rooftop 6+1 in the Tom Crawford case. He also claimed to have bought a car from a garage using a WeRe Cheque and also cleared his council tax using a WeRe Cheque, both of which proved bogus.

Here is in his own video trying to goad the apparent troll from their court case, into hitting him.

Quatloos or Quatlosers get a mention lol

https://www.facebook.com/10000465916946 ... 184896246/

Re: Jay Bradley

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:00 am
by Burnaby49
Time to clear up a backstory on that troll. The Crawfords kept claiming that he was a Quatloos contributor but chose not to give his member's name to confirm this so it was discounted as just more Crawford bullshit. However they were correct.

The troll, who seemed to have a pathological hatred of the Crawfords, posted on Quatloos as Crawfrauds. He has the distinction of being one of the few individuals permanently banned from Quatloos because of his offensive postings and behaviour. You can check out his Quatloos postings here;

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29035

You'll note that some of his posts are essentially blanks. That was because we mods deleted the portions that were grossly offensive which, in some instances, constituted the entire post.

Re: Jay Bradley

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:25 am
by SteveUK
Burnaby49 wrote:Time to clear up a backstory on that troll. The Crawfords kept claiming that he was a Quatloos contributor but chose not to give his member's name to confirm this so it was discounted as just more Crawford bullshit. However they were correct.

The troll, who seemed to have a pathological hatred of the Crawfords, posted on Quatloos as Crawfrauds. He has the distinction of being one of the few individuals permanently banned from Quatloos because of his offensive postings and behaviour. You can check out his Quatloos postings here;

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29035

You'll note that some of his posts are essentially blanks. That was because we mods deleted the portions that were grossly offensive which, in some instances, constituted the entire post.

One of the only honest claims to come from a Crawford....

Re: Jay Bradley

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:25 am
by notorial dissent
Quite true, he was a vile little troll during the brief spell he was here, and is missed not at all. I will give credit where credit is due, he seemed to be an equal opportunity troll, vile to all. I still have to admit to a certain prurient curiosity as to what they could possibly have done to personally piss hm off so seriously. He had a real hate on for them. I mean he may be just one of those people who hates the entire world and just happened to be momentarily fixated on the Crawfords, but no way to really tell. At any rate, he is their problem, not ours.

Re: Jay Bradley

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:03 pm
by Penny Wise
Looking at the dates, it would appear (not that in the grand scheme of things) that it matters but he only started posting here after he was accused of being a member here when he bumped into Craig Crawford and Jay Bradley. Could be argued that he only became a poster here after he was pointed in this direction by the Crawfords themselves

Joined:
Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:35 pm

Re: Jay Bradley

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:04 am
by rumpelstilzchen
letissier14 wrote:He also claimed to have bought a car from a garage using a WeRe Cheque
We should not forget that Jay also claimed to have received a substantial interim payment from HMCTS and had used the money to buy himself a car.
He made a nice little film with him posing in front of the Mercedes.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4DmCkoBQt0E

Sadly for him he eventually had to eat humble pie and apologise to his fans for lying about owning a vehicle which was in fact a car he had hired.