Re: Robert 'Crab Bait' White consents to lose his house
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 9:30 pm
It would probably sound better and more erudite if it was rendered in Latin.
Quatloos! The views herein are not those of Quatloosia Publishing LLC -- Legal Issues Fax to 877-698-0678 and admin issues to sooltauq [at] gmail.com
https://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/
Stultus omnia incipit.Dr. Caligari wrote:That should be the motto of Quatloos.longdog wrote:What all of these idiots fail to grasp is that they don't have a fucking clue what they are talking about. From that all else follows.The Observer wrote:It would probably sound better and more erudite if it was rendered in Latin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E ... ger_effectlongdog wrote:What all of these idiots fail to grasp is that they don't have a fucking clue what they are talking about. From that all else follows.
Gregg wrote:Didn't she just recently upsticks and make her own, separate, housing arrangements? She might be having a laugh at all this herself and even welcome getting the cheque for her half.
There was a post saying his wife had cleared off & another saying he was going to pay the OR in cash. All a wind up for the Q members. I can't be arsed to scroll through PLD to find the post. Shortly after someone posted the links to the PLD & Crab threads on Q. Remember? Seditious & peeeeedafiles.notorial dissent wrote:I thought it looked like she was supporting him, literally and figuratively, at one point, but then I do remember something about her going elsewhere.
We shouldn't speculate without facts, but I suspect he has cash rich business interests.notorial dissent wrote:Of course I'm still trying to figure out how he/they are supporting themselves, I got the impression she was working, since he doesn't seem to be employed at all. I can't quite imagine that he just happens to have £40,000 lying around, so I expect he's for it one way or another.
Judge Carey said White had a business which he ran from home.
His wife, who suffers from arthritis, feared the business would collapse if he were sent to prison.
Now, for me, that is a damn good reason to not do things like refuse to pay my taxes or other footle foolishness that might get me sent to prison.His wife, who suffers from arthritis, feared the business would collapse if he were sent to prison.
Footlishness?Gregg wrote:footle foolishness
TheNewSaint wrote:Footlishness?Gregg wrote:footle foolishness
Prepare to be foreclosed?Chaos wrote:TheNewSaint wrote:Footlishness?Gregg wrote:footle foolishness
resistance is footle!
There is a Dunning-Kruger poster around somewhere. The text is something like:Siegfried Shrink wrote:Very interesting.
Right rebels I think we're on to something here. You may remember last week I questioned the validity of a summons I received for council tax. Well I emailed the non court and the council to prove it was a valid summons, I got a reply from the (poor) council representative today (nothing from the non court yet) and I believe I have a good case for fraud. I will peruse and sleep on the documents received and post them here tomorrow. I have replied to Zoe asking if she will be available tomorrow before I go to the police station. To be continued.
I'm fully confident that the police will tell him to get lost but will have a change of heart when Crabbie bombards them with the notices of treason that have worked so infallibly for him in the past.aesmith wrote:So he plans to ask the Police to prosecute the council for fraud? Or prosecute the court maybe. The "fraud" being their Council Tax enforcement process. Can't see it as a winner myself.
A DVLA clamp? Hmmmm... I wonder why that might be... I wonder if the dark, treasonous hand of the Official Receiver is behind this further act of dark and traitorous treason...Robert White
Made another visit to the non court this morning to see if I was on their system yet. The usher said I was not on their computer, (different usher to last week), when I said it was for CT she said, the council rent out a room for their summonses, I’m pretty sure they didn’t even bother doing that.
After that I went to the police station to report a fraud. I showed them the summons, the emails and the documents received so far, she admitted it didn’t seem right but they cannot do anything without the council or court admitting it’s a fraudulent summons. No surprise really and she said I should get advice from a solicitor or citizens advice, I told her they are all part of the same system and I would not do that. I was very polite and told her I will not be attending the non court on 25th September and may see you again soon. Meanwhile I’ll keep plugging away with the council and non court emails. Oh yeah, my car got a DVLA clamp on it this morning I'll be cutting it off tomorrow.
All sarcasm aside, he must be out of tax and on a road if it is DVLA. He also has 24hours to put it right, so cutting it off "tomorrow" would mean he'd better do it early rather than later or the car won't be there for the clamp to be cut off from. Of course cutting a clamp off is criminal damage but no doubt he has some excuse as to why the "do no harm" bit doesn't apply in this situation.longdog wrote:A DVLA clamp? Hmmmm... I wonder why that might be... I wonder if the dark, treasonous hand of the Official Receiver is behind this further act of dark and traitorous treason...Robert White
Oh yeah, my car got a DVLA clamp on it this morning I'll be cutting it off tomorrow.
Can't see the OR bothering when they have the house to go for. Plus it might be on finance.JimUk1 wrote:Didn't a google street view of his house show a nice Land Rover sat on the drive?
I'd be expecting that to be gone soon, Crabby.
No, it will certainly fail. Having said that, I do dislike the cozy CT enforcement arrangements between some councils and courts. Summons are approved very casually in bulk, and councils permitted to send them out. Claims for costs and court fees sometimes seem to be nodded through. I think it would be a good thing to restore some distance.aesmith wrote:So he plans to ask the Police to prosecute the council for fraud? Or prosecute the court maybe. The "fraud" being their Council Tax enforcement process. Can't see it as a winner myself.