Meet the Dragons

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

User avatar
morrand
Pirate Captain
Pirate Captain
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:42 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby morrand » Sat Sep 09, 2017 12:41 am

Philistine wrote:
NYGman wrote:Just curious, what are the chances the logo they are using was actually made, and copyrighted by someone else.

While a simple white Dragon on a black flag is not unique, that dragon has a lot of detail, someone must have spent time on it. Granted, my knowledge of historical flags is lacking, and this could be public domain.


No, like this:

https://www.metal-archives.com/albums/B ... areer/2021

Image

They shopped it to white though.


Not quite. Darn close, though. Google Images sure thinks it's the same. (The tongue/flames are different, and the curve of the tail is a bit different, too, among a couple of other subtle differences.)

There is an even closer match on Wikipedia, of all places:

Image

Again, though, the tongue is different, and again there are a couple of other minor differences, so I don't think it's a direct copy-and-paste job. It'd be a tough call to say they've cribbed from Brimstone; they probably both copied from the same source, which could be the Wikipedia image, or all three could come from some other common source.

All I know is that all those Sunday mornings playing the Hocus-Focus did not entirely go to waste.
---
Morrand

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1036
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:35 am

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby TheNewSaint » Sat Sep 09, 2017 4:15 pm

NYGman wrote: Would love for the owner (if there is one) to sue them for its unapproved use without compensation... Maybe just wishful thinking


More realistically, the copyright owner would try to get them to stop using it. I doubt they want their artwork associated with such a shitty, hateful organization.

letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 4:02 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby letissier14 » Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:34 am

Image

Image
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions

Wakeman52
Cannoneer
Cannoneer
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:50 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Wakeman52 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:29 pm

I doubt that, even if they get the party approved by the Electoral Commission, they'll be able to raise the funds required for standing in one constituency at a General Election.
The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they’ve found it - Terry Pratchett.

Firthy2002
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:24 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Firthy2002 » Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:51 pm

It's hard work and costly to stand in a General Election if you want to run even a half decent campaign.

Since they're a new party, just standing a paper candidate won't cut it if they want to get that £500 deposit back.
They'll need to put out at least one leaflet and canvassing would be absolutely essential.

Somehow I can't see them mustering enough supporters.
-=Firthy2002=-

Watching idiots dig themselves into holes since 2016.

Chaos
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 563
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Chaos » Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:29 am

Firthy2002 wrote:It's hard work and costly to stand in a General Election if you want to run even a half decent campaign.

Since they're a new party, just standing a paper candidate won't cut it if they want to get that £500 deposit back.
They'll need to put out at least one leaflet and canvassing would be absolutely essential.

Somehow I can't see them mustering enough supporters.



are you trying to say it will just.................drag-on?

Siegfried Shrink
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 518
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 10:29 pm
Location: West Midlands, England
Contact:

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Siegfried Shrink » Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:46 am

They need to get a certain percentage of the vote to get the deposit back. Some mainstream UK parties lose their deposits despite putting on a reasonable campaign.

User avatar
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 10646
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:17 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby notorial dissent » Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:58 pm

So, if I'm reading this right, they are going to form a crackpot political party of maybe 5-10 crackpots? Assuming that any of them are or will be registered to vote, that means maybe 10 votes come the tally. And they expect to actually accomplish anything other than waste money they don't have?
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Hercule Parrot » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:21 pm

notorial dissent wrote:So, if I'm reading this right, they are going to form a crackpot political party of maybe 5-10 crackpots?


Yup. Their supposed Judicial Reviews are just as fanciful. I'll wager they are thrown out without any substantial hearing, because they are based upon imaginary concepts of law (eg A61).
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.

Wakeman52
Cannoneer
Cannoneer
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 8:50 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Wakeman52 » Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:44 pm

Image

This looks like the front cover of a document in the public domain. Waste of time copying it, then. Let's see.

Ah yes, quoted here....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... s-ago.html

Why on earth is he attempting to resurrect this old chestnut & calling it treason? After all, the related Parliamentary petition (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/162714) raised such a great deal of interest. Image

Hercule Parrot wrote:Yup. Their supposed Judicial Reviews are just as fanciful. I'll wager they are thrown out without any substantial hearing, because they are based upon imaginary concepts of law (eg A61).


Agreed - especially as it's irrelevant. Events and history have apparently passed by (or over) Mr Moore without leaving a lasting impression, surely a result of his incredibly thick skin.
The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they’ve found it - Terry Pratchett.

letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 4:02 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby letissier14 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:00 am

More begging

Image

And the Dragons 3rd in command showing what a racist party they actually are

Image
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions

letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 4:02 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby letissier14 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 11:49 am

:shrug: :shrug: :shrug:

Image
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions

longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1735
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:53 am

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby longdog » Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:09 pm

Gibberish.
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?

JimUk1
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:47 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby JimUk1 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:11 pm

Is that moron suggesting the government must pay compensation at 1% to the people of the UK?

That is the most incomprehensible gibberish imaginable.

letissier14
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 4:02 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby letissier14 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:44 pm

Have you noticed the date on the letter?

11/9/2107 :haha:
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4356
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Contact:

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Gregg » Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:31 pm

JimUk1 wrote:Is that moron suggesting the government must pay compensation at 1% to the people of the UK?

That is the most incomprehensible gibberish imaginable.


I think he is suggesting that the government must pay compensation of 1% to him. Failing that, I'm sure he envisions some sort of finder's fee at least.

Calling it gibberish is an insult to word salad generators everywhere.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.

exiledscouser
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 601
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:01 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby exiledscouser » Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:14 pm

Gregg wrote:
JimUk1 wrote:Is that moron suggesting the government must pay compensation at 1% to the people of the UK?

That is the most incomprehensible gibberish imaginable.


I think he is suggesting that the government must pay compensation of 1% to him. Failing that, I'm sure he envisions some sort of finder's fee at least.

Calling it gibberish is an insult to word salad generators everywhere.


I think you are entirely right, the 1% is intended for the currently impecunious Mr Moore, particularly as he has his PayPal begging bowl out and hasn't two pennies with which to scratch his arse.

User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 4356
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 6:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Contact:

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Gregg » Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:23 pm

As for it being "gibberish", he's really just a second drawer piker. This, my friends, is lifted from a HATJ associated forum on the I U-V blog.

Someone who gets better drugs than I ever had wrote:Robert Sweetman says : REPLY
July 24, 2017 at 10:49 pm
Do you know how to live in harmony and balance without money? Before there was Money,there were the highly magnetic ley lines, that the 12 Human Tribes and 12 Klans that were the last group in the harmonic history of earth tells us, that we as Human Tribal members had 3 Pole DNA I have an original copy smuggled out of a Vatican Draco lab, the original 3 Pole Trinary Base 9/DNA energetic configuration that allowed us to manifest With thought alone using the ley lines of magnetic energy,before the Draco altered both the poles to put ice there where electric current can’t conduct in fresh water versus salt water that GAIA is changing it all back to original 3 pole ley line configuration She is sending g out currently our 3 pole repair signal and why they worked overtime, to setup thrir Gwenn Towers,microwave cel phone towers to drown out with electronic smog,GAIAs signal. You also need Salmiak a trade name for God salt in Scandinavia that allows for lght transfer between phosphorus pole in the First two poles to light up with the 3rd and now you HAVE 3 poles lit and it repairs the pole 1 and 2


Now, that's some extra strength,must have a special permit to use, gibberish.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.

JimUk1
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:47 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby JimUk1 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 4:22 pm

1% of the fiscal loss?
More word salad from some idiot trying to appease to other idiots.

What fiscal loss is he referring to? Does he mean British membership in the EU? (Britians contributions, minus what Britian takes back from the EU?)

It's as if he learnt the word 'fiscal' last week.

I presume he means economic loss, which is a far more complex subject that even professional economic professors struggled with during the Brexit debate.....

And yet this simpleton seems to think he knows everything about it.

Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:58 pm

Re: Meet the Dragons

Postby Hercule Parrot » Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:59 pm

Image

Good grief, this is nonsense. If it is the required letter before action (as titled), then why does the text say that the application for JR has been made? And what government decision are they asking the court to review? JR can only be used to challenge a specified state action (or inaction) occuring no more than 3 months previously. This imaginary JR seeks to overturn decisions made 40 years ago, it is absolutely going to be struck out at sift.

In a further twist, the letter goes on claim that the government cannot carry out the demanded actions, thus providing a further ground for strike out. A JR which seeks to compel an impossible action by a public body is inherently an abuse of process.

What an extraordinary waste of time and paper.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.


Return to “United Kingdom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest